Adjuvant Systemic Treatment for Renal Cancer After Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis

N. Sathianathen, M. Furrer, C. Weight, D. Murphy, Shilpa Gupta, N. Lawrentschuk
{"title":"Adjuvant Systemic Treatment for Renal Cancer After Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"N. Sathianathen, M. Furrer, C. Weight, D. Murphy, Shilpa Gupta, N. Lawrentschuk","doi":"10.48083/wixm2804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Approximately 15% to 20% of patients will experience disease recurrence following surgical removal of renal cell carcinoma. A range of pharmacological agents is prescribed for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but there are trials testing whether these have an earlier role in the adjuvant setting. We aim to assess the efficacy of adjuvant systemic treatment following surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma and to determine the most effective treatment. Methods The protocol for this review was published in PROSPERO (CRD42021281588). We searched multiple databases up to August 2021. We included only randomized trials of patients with renal cell carcinoma that had been completely resected. We included patients with locoregional nodal disease if it was surgically removed, and excluded all cases of metastatic disease. We included all adjuvant systemic therapies that were commenced within 90 days of renal surgery. A network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach. Results A total of 13 studies with 8103 patients were included for analysis. Only pembrolizumab (HR 0.74; 95%CI 0.57 to 0.96) and pazopanib (HR 0.80; 95%CI 0.68 to 0.95) improved disease-free survival compared with observation. These 2 treatments were the 2 highest ranked comparisons with a P-score of 0.87 and 0.80. No agent improved overall survival. All agents increased the risk of severe adverse events compared with observation. Conclusions Pembrolizumab and pazopanib were the only 2 adjuvant agents that improved time to disease recurrence compared with observation, with the former likely being the more efficacious. None of the treatments improved overall survival and almost all increased severe adverse events. Introduction","PeriodicalId":21961,"journal":{"name":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48083/wixm2804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Approximately 15% to 20% of patients will experience disease recurrence following surgical removal of renal cell carcinoma. A range of pharmacological agents is prescribed for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but there are trials testing whether these have an earlier role in the adjuvant setting. We aim to assess the efficacy of adjuvant systemic treatment following surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma and to determine the most effective treatment. Methods The protocol for this review was published in PROSPERO (CRD42021281588). We searched multiple databases up to August 2021. We included only randomized trials of patients with renal cell carcinoma that had been completely resected. We included patients with locoregional nodal disease if it was surgically removed, and excluded all cases of metastatic disease. We included all adjuvant systemic therapies that were commenced within 90 days of renal surgery. A network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach. Results A total of 13 studies with 8103 patients were included for analysis. Only pembrolizumab (HR 0.74; 95%CI 0.57 to 0.96) and pazopanib (HR 0.80; 95%CI 0.68 to 0.95) improved disease-free survival compared with observation. These 2 treatments were the 2 highest ranked comparisons with a P-score of 0.87 and 0.80. No agent improved overall survival. All agents increased the risk of severe adverse events compared with observation. Conclusions Pembrolizumab and pazopanib were the only 2 adjuvant agents that improved time to disease recurrence compared with observation, with the former likely being the more efficacious. None of the treatments improved overall survival and almost all increased severe adverse events. Introduction
肾癌术后辅助全身治疗:网络荟萃分析
背景:大约15% - 20%的患者在肾细胞癌手术切除后会出现疾病复发。转移性肾细胞癌的一系列药物处方,但有试验测试这些是否有早期的辅助设置的作用。我们的目的是评估肾细胞癌患者手术后辅助全身治疗的疗效,并确定最有效的治疗方法。方法本综述的方案发表在PROSPERO杂志(CRD42021281588)。我们检索了截至2021年8月的多个数据库。我们只纳入了完全切除的肾细胞癌患者的随机试验。我们纳入了手术切除的局部区域淋巴结疾病患者,并排除了所有转移性疾病病例。我们纳入了肾手术后90天内开始的所有辅助全身治疗。使用频率分析方法进行网络元分析。结果共纳入13项研究,8103例患者。只有派姆单抗(HR 0.74;95%CI 0.57 ~ 0.96)和帕唑帕尼(HR 0.80;(95%CI 0.68 ~ 0.95)与观察组比较,无病生存率提高。这2个处理是排名最高的2个比较,p值分别为0.87和0.80。没有药物能提高总生存率。与观察结果相比,所有药物均增加了严重不良事件的风险。结论与观察相比,Pembrolizumab和pazopanib是仅有的两种缩短疾病复发时间的佐剂,前者可能更有效。没有一种治疗方法能提高总生存率,而且几乎所有的治疗方法都增加了严重的不良事件。介绍
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信