Evaluation of the G8 Screening Tool in Older Patients with Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

M. Schlögl, D. Blum, E. Schmidt, -. FranziscaDomeisen, Benedetti, F. Strasser
{"title":"Evaluation of the G8 Screening Tool in Older Patients with Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"M. Schlögl, D. Blum, E. Schmidt, -. FranziscaDomeisen, Benedetti, F. Strasser","doi":"10.29011/2574-710x.10124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aims of this study were to evaluate the results of the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening in patients aged 75 years and over. Findings: Of 2,294 patients screened, 177 were ≥ 75 years. 120 patients (68%) were vulnerable as defined by a G8 score ≤ 14. Vulnerable patients showed worse outcomes than fit patients did. In binary logistic regression modeling, the G8 domains of nutritional intake and health status were predictive of hospitalization and of death, when controlling for all other variables. Message: The G8 screening is applicable and can discriminate between fit and vulnerable patients in oncology. Prospective use in treatment decisions might improve care for geriatric cancer patients. Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the results of the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening in patients aged 75 years and over. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we screened the medical records of 2294 patients referred to the Department for Medical Oncology in St. Gallen, a tertiary hospital in Switzerland, over a period of 29 days. For each patient aged 75 and older, the responsible oncologist completed the G8 questionnaire. The cohort was followed to obtain data on patient outcomes for the 4 months following the completion of the G8 assessment. Patients’ charts were reviewed following a standardized approach. Information regarding given anticancer treatment, anticancer toxicity, date and reason for inpatient admission, date of inpatient discharge, and date of death was documented. Data were analyzed using the Χ 2 test and binary logistic regression. Results: Of 2,294 patients screened, 177 were ≥75 years. 176 G8 assessments were completed on patients with various tumor types. 152 (86%) were outpatients and 112 (64%) males. Mean age was 79.9 years (SD 4.3). 120 patients (68%) were vulnerable as defined by a G8 score ≤ 14. Vulnerable patients showed worse outcomes than fit patients did. In binary logistic regression modeling, the G8 domains of nutritional intake and health status were predictive of hospitalization and of death, when controlling for all other variables. Conclusion: The G8 screening is applicable and can discriminate between fit and vulnerable patients in oncology. Prospective use in treatment decisions might improve care for geriatric cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":73876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oncology research and therapy","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oncology research and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2574-710x.10124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: The aims of this study were to evaluate the results of the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening in patients aged 75 years and over. Findings: Of 2,294 patients screened, 177 were ≥ 75 years. 120 patients (68%) were vulnerable as defined by a G8 score ≤ 14. Vulnerable patients showed worse outcomes than fit patients did. In binary logistic regression modeling, the G8 domains of nutritional intake and health status were predictive of hospitalization and of death, when controlling for all other variables. Message: The G8 screening is applicable and can discriminate between fit and vulnerable patients in oncology. Prospective use in treatment decisions might improve care for geriatric cancer patients. Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the results of the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening in patients aged 75 years and over. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we screened the medical records of 2294 patients referred to the Department for Medical Oncology in St. Gallen, a tertiary hospital in Switzerland, over a period of 29 days. For each patient aged 75 and older, the responsible oncologist completed the G8 questionnaire. The cohort was followed to obtain data on patient outcomes for the 4 months following the completion of the G8 assessment. Patients’ charts were reviewed following a standardized approach. Information regarding given anticancer treatment, anticancer toxicity, date and reason for inpatient admission, date of inpatient discharge, and date of death was documented. Data were analyzed using the Χ 2 test and binary logistic regression. Results: Of 2,294 patients screened, 177 were ≥75 years. 176 G8 assessments were completed on patients with various tumor types. 152 (86%) were outpatients and 112 (64%) males. Mean age was 79.9 years (SD 4.3). 120 patients (68%) were vulnerable as defined by a G8 score ≤ 14. Vulnerable patients showed worse outcomes than fit patients did. In binary logistic regression modeling, the G8 domains of nutritional intake and health status were predictive of hospitalization and of death, when controlling for all other variables. Conclusion: The G8 screening is applicable and can discriminate between fit and vulnerable patients in oncology. Prospective use in treatment decisions might improve care for geriatric cancer patients.
老年癌症患者G8筛查工具的评价:回顾性分析
目的:本研究的目的是评估75岁及以上患者的老年8 (G8)筛查结果。结果:在2294例筛查患者中,177例年龄≥75岁。120例(68%)患者的G8评分≤14。脆弱的病人比健康的病人表现出更差的结果。在二元逻辑回归模型中,当控制所有其他变量时,营养摄入和健康状况的G8域可预测住院和死亡。信息:G8筛查是适用的,可以区分适合和脆弱的肿瘤患者。在治疗决策中的前瞻性应用可能会改善对老年癌症患者的护理。目的:评价75岁及以上患者的老年8 (Geriatric 8, G8)筛查结果。方法:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们筛选了2294例转诊至瑞士圣加伦三级医院肿瘤内科的患者,时间为29天。对于每位75岁及以上的患者,负责的肿瘤学家完成G8问卷。对该队列进行随访,以获得完成G8评估后4个月的患者预后数据。按照标准化的方法对患者的病历进行审查。有关给予的抗癌治疗、抗癌毒性、住院日期和住院原因、出院日期和死亡日期的信息被记录下来。数据分析采用Χ 2检验和二元逻辑回归。结果:在筛选的2294例患者中,177例年龄≥75岁。对不同肿瘤类型患者共完成176例G8评估。门诊152例(86%),男性112例(64%)。平均年龄79.9岁(SD 4.3)。120例(68%)患者的G8评分≤14。脆弱的病人比健康的病人表现出更差的结果。在二元逻辑回归模型中,当控制所有其他变量时,营养摄入和健康状况的G8域可预测住院和死亡。结论:G8筛查是一种适用于肿瘤健康患者和弱势患者的筛查方法。在治疗决策中的前瞻性应用可能会改善对老年癌症患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信