Sustainability transitions in Los Angeles’ water system: the ambivalent role of incumbents in urban experimentation

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Tessa Mauw, Shaun Smith, Jonas Torrens
{"title":"Sustainability transitions in Los Angeles’ water system: the ambivalent role of incumbents in urban experimentation","authors":"Tessa Mauw, Shaun Smith, Jonas Torrens","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2156487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Growing urban populations, climate change, drought, and ageing infrastructures increase pressure on water delivery. This prompts the search for innovations, with incumbents increasingly attempting to enable and steer ‘experimental’ approaches. Historically, incumbents were assumed to be largely resistant to potentially disruptive innovations. However, their strategic orientations may be changing due to the urgency of sustainability challenges leading to increased experimentation. This change raises a question about how incumbents influence experiments in particular directions while neglecting or discouraging others. This research centers on the ‘La Kretz Innovation Campus’, and three experiments therein, partly established by the incumbent water utility in Los Angeles. It explores how creating an internal ‘protective space’ for experimentation generates struggles over institutional changes necessary for such experiments to thrive. Conceptualizing ‘incumbent-enabled experimentation’ as a set of practices nested within novel institutional, organizational, and political arrangements reveals the internal tensions incumbents face when seeking more sustainable directions.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"298 1","pages":"368 - 385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2156487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Growing urban populations, climate change, drought, and ageing infrastructures increase pressure on water delivery. This prompts the search for innovations, with incumbents increasingly attempting to enable and steer ‘experimental’ approaches. Historically, incumbents were assumed to be largely resistant to potentially disruptive innovations. However, their strategic orientations may be changing due to the urgency of sustainability challenges leading to increased experimentation. This change raises a question about how incumbents influence experiments in particular directions while neglecting or discouraging others. This research centers on the ‘La Kretz Innovation Campus’, and three experiments therein, partly established by the incumbent water utility in Los Angeles. It explores how creating an internal ‘protective space’ for experimentation generates struggles over institutional changes necessary for such experiments to thrive. Conceptualizing ‘incumbent-enabled experimentation’ as a set of practices nested within novel institutional, organizational, and political arrangements reveals the internal tensions incumbents face when seeking more sustainable directions.
洛杉矶水系统的可持续转型:城市实验中现任者的矛盾角色
不断增长的城市人口、气候变化、干旱和老化的基础设施增加了供水的压力。这促使企业寻求创新,现有企业越来越多地尝试启用和引导“实验性”方法。从历史上看,现有企业被认为在很大程度上抵制潜在的破坏性创新。然而,由于可持续性挑战的紧迫性导致实验的增加,它们的战略方向可能正在改变。这种变化提出了一个问题,即在位者如何影响特定方向的实验,同时忽视或阻碍其他方向的实验。这项研究以“La Kretz创新园区”为中心,其中有三个实验,部分由洛杉矶现有的水务公司建立。它探讨了如何为实验创造一个内部的“保护空间”,从而产生对这种实验蓬勃发展所必需的制度变革的斗争。将“在位者支持的实验”概念化为一组嵌套在新的制度、组织和政治安排中的实践,揭示了在位者在寻求更可持续发展方向时面临的内部紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信