Evolving ECDIS: Concept Development Through Different Manufacturer Models Comparison

IF 0.7 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Srdjan ŽuŁkin, David Brčić, Marin Uroda, Marko Strabic
{"title":"Evolving ECDIS: Concept Development Through Different Manufacturer Models Comparison","authors":"Srdjan ŽuŁkin, David Brčić, Marin Uroda, Marko Strabic","doi":"10.12716/1001.17.01.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS) became inevitable central navigational tool for effective voyage planning and voyage monitoring execution. Furthermore, each model comprises numerous navigational and other display components, each of them with its limitations, reliability and simplicity. This is also supported by the fact that there is a large number of approved manufacturer systems on the market. Apart from fulfilling the performance standards regulated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the system models differ significantly regarding handling, interface, and interpretation of data and information, therefore biasing the required knowledge and the purposefulness of the system. The aim of this study is to determine navigators’ response in ECDIS comparison of different manufacturer models to identify pros and cons of specific tasks, features and other navigational functions. The present work is based on international survey in form of questionnaire conducted among ECDIS stakeholders. Answers are presented and discussed, revealing certain shortcomings of specific manufacturer ECDIS system. On the other hand, the analyses show the significant advantages of each system, potentially leading to creation of the ideal system from the end ‐ user’s perspective. The proper configuration of ECDIS should standardise functions and display considering different types, and undoubtedly resolve a problematic issue as a consequence of numerous ECDIS models and their diversities.","PeriodicalId":46009,"journal":{"name":"TransNav-International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TransNav-International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.17.01.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS) became inevitable central navigational tool for effective voyage planning and voyage monitoring execution. Furthermore, each model comprises numerous navigational and other display components, each of them with its limitations, reliability and simplicity. This is also supported by the fact that there is a large number of approved manufacturer systems on the market. Apart from fulfilling the performance standards regulated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the system models differ significantly regarding handling, interface, and interpretation of data and information, therefore biasing the required knowledge and the purposefulness of the system. The aim of this study is to determine navigators’ response in ECDIS comparison of different manufacturer models to identify pros and cons of specific tasks, features and other navigational functions. The present work is based on international survey in form of questionnaire conducted among ECDIS stakeholders. Answers are presented and discussed, revealing certain shortcomings of specific manufacturer ECDIS system. On the other hand, the analyses show the significant advantages of each system, potentially leading to creation of the ideal system from the end ‐ user’s perspective. The proper configuration of ECDIS should standardise functions and display considering different types, and undoubtedly resolve a problematic issue as a consequence of numerous ECDIS models and their diversities.
不断发展的ECDIS:通过不同制造商模型比较的概念发展
电子海图显示和信息系统(ECDIS)成为有效的航次规划和航次监测执行的不可避免的中央导航工具。此外,每个模型都包含许多导航和其他显示组件,每个组件都有其局限性、可靠性和简单性。市场上有大量经过批准的制造商系统,这一事实也支持了这一点。除了满足国际海事组织(IMO)规定的性能标准外,系统模型在数据和信息的处理、接口和解释方面存在显着差异,因此会影响所需的知识和系统的目的性。本研究的目的是确定导航员在不同制造商模型的ECDIS比较中的反应,以确定特定任务,特征和其他导航功能的优缺点。目前的工作是基于在ECDIS利益相关者中进行的问卷形式的国际调查。给出了答案并进行了讨论,揭示了特定制造商ECDIS系统的某些缺点。另一方面,分析显示了每个系统的显著优势,从最终用户的角度来看,可能会导致理想系统的创建。ECDIS的正确配置应该考虑到不同类型的功能和显示的标准化,并且无疑可以解决由于ECDIS模型众多及其多样性而导致的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信