Adopting participatory planning paradigm in rivers state: a catalyst or an impedance to effective community planning

Brown Ibama, Boyle Sodieari Henderson
{"title":"Adopting participatory planning paradigm in rivers state: a catalyst or an impedance to effective community planning","authors":"Brown Ibama, Boyle Sodieari Henderson","doi":"10.15406/ijh.2022.06.00307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory planning is a holistic paradigm entrenched in most advanced democracies to manage community planning where communities are critical stakeholders, co-owners and net beneficiaries of the planning scheme. However, the narrative is different in Rivers State and, by extension Nigeria due to the existing social disconnect and trust deficit between the proponents and beneficiaries of the planning scheme. Most times, the proponents are the government, MDAs, oil and gas multinationals, private investors, and the beneficiaries (host communities). This paper reviews the extant Urban and Regional Planning Laws- Nigerian Urban and Regional Planning Law NURPL Decree 88 of 1992 now CAP N138 LFN 2004 and the Rivers State Physical Planning and Development Law No. 6 of 2003 are operational in Nigeria and Rivers State. However, findings from the review indicate no section or provision in these planning laws and regulations where participatory planning is considered part of the laws. Thus, making participatory planning very difficult to achieve in Rivers State and Nigeria. Therefore, the review recommends that all extant Planning laws be amended with Arnstein’s Ladder of Citizen Participation added as sections of these planning laws. The review further generated a new framework to achieve effective participatory planning such that when included in the extant laws. This framework, if adopted, would enhance holistic, participatory planning in most communities because the community members are co-owners and critical stakeholders in the entire planning project.","PeriodicalId":14063,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hydrology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/ijh.2022.06.00307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participatory planning is a holistic paradigm entrenched in most advanced democracies to manage community planning where communities are critical stakeholders, co-owners and net beneficiaries of the planning scheme. However, the narrative is different in Rivers State and, by extension Nigeria due to the existing social disconnect and trust deficit between the proponents and beneficiaries of the planning scheme. Most times, the proponents are the government, MDAs, oil and gas multinationals, private investors, and the beneficiaries (host communities). This paper reviews the extant Urban and Regional Planning Laws- Nigerian Urban and Regional Planning Law NURPL Decree 88 of 1992 now CAP N138 LFN 2004 and the Rivers State Physical Planning and Development Law No. 6 of 2003 are operational in Nigeria and Rivers State. However, findings from the review indicate no section or provision in these planning laws and regulations where participatory planning is considered part of the laws. Thus, making participatory planning very difficult to achieve in Rivers State and Nigeria. Therefore, the review recommends that all extant Planning laws be amended with Arnstein’s Ladder of Citizen Participation added as sections of these planning laws. The review further generated a new framework to achieve effective participatory planning such that when included in the extant laws. This framework, if adopted, would enhance holistic, participatory planning in most communities because the community members are co-owners and critical stakeholders in the entire planning project.
河州采用参与式规划范式:促进或阻碍有效的社区规划
参与式规划是大多数先进民主国家管理社区规划的一种整体模式,社区是规划方案的关键利益相关者、共同所有者和净受益者。然而,由于规划方案的支持者和受益者之间存在社会脱节和信任缺失,河流州以及尼日利亚的情况有所不同。大多数时候,支持者是政府、MDAs、石油和天然气跨国公司、私人投资者和受益者(东道国社区)。本文回顾了现有的城市和区域规划法——1992年尼日利亚城市和区域规划法NURPL法令88(现为2004年第N138章)和2003年在尼日利亚和河流州实施的《河流州自然规划和发展法》第6号。但是,审查的结果表明,这些规划法律和条例中没有任何章节或规定将参与性规划视为法律的一部分。因此,参与性规划很难在河流州和尼日利亚实现。因此,审查建议修改所有现存的规划法,将阿恩斯坦的公民参与阶梯作为这些规划法的一部分。审查进一步产生了一个新的框架,以实现有效的参与性规划,并将其纳入现行法律。如果采用这一框架,将加强大多数社区的整体参与性规划,因为社区成员是整个规划项目的共同所有者和关键利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信