Improved Business Climate and FDI in the Western Balkans

Q3 Social Sciences
R. Osmani
{"title":"Improved Business Climate and FDI in the Western Balkans","authors":"R. Osmani","doi":"10.14706/JECOSS16611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe complex political and economic transition in the countries of the Western Balkans in the past two decades has been accompanied by numerous economic and political asymmetrical strokes.During this complex process the governments of the countries of the Western Balkans (WB) with the assistance of the IMF and World Bank implemented the economic policies that aimed to achieve macroeconomic stabilization, transformation and privatization of state owned enterprises and to reform the economic system and public institutions.After two decades of implementation of intensive economic policies the countries of the Western Balkan have achieved macroeconomic stabilization but the results in reforming the economy, reforming the public sector and the public institutions are in insufficient level and continue to remain challenges for these countries in the future.In fact, the asymmetric development during the previous system and the low levels of economical growth in the first decade of the transition followed by increasing levels of unemployment, poverty, the large informal sector and fiscal evasion were the main obstacles in implementing deep institutional reforms and establishing a functional market economy in the Western Balkan's (Osmani & Mazllami, 2014).The process of economic and political transition in the Western Balkans due to achieved asymmetric results do not solve in approriate level three main problems of economic transition (Commander, 1991).1) Finding a new balance between private sector and public sector,2) Finding the balance between profits and wages in the private sector, and3) Finding the balance between monetary and fiscal policy within the strategy that aim macroeconomic stabilization and economic development.Three balances realized at transition countries of the Western Balkans are in suboptimal levels as a result of numerous deficits and economic and social problems, lack of voluminous local and foreign investment and significant delays in the implementation of economic and institutional reforms as a result of lack of national political consensus.Delays and poor quality of structural reforms still remain as the major obstacles in attracting foreign investment although as serious progress was made in terms of creating a more favorable environment business largely of formal nature.As a consequence, that indicator \"Ease of Doing Business\" does not include areas such as: the level of corruption, independence of the judiciary, the size of the market, political and economic risk and functionality of public institutions, this indicator does not reflect the full attractiveness of business environement as crutial precondition in attracting foreign direct investment.Despite the fact that Macedonia on the basis of the indicator, Doing Business, in the period 2010-2015 is listed as a leader in the West Balkans, country has realized the lowest level of foreign direct investment in volume and quality compared to the West Balkans and EU countries.Due to the low level of foreign direct investment, the lack of national investment, the hesitation of the banking sector in financing new investments as a result of the growth of bad loans and considerable reduction of economic remittances Macedonia remains as the country with the highes level of unemployment and poverty in Europe.The research aims to analyze the correlation between the level of ranking of countries according to the indicator, Doing Business, and the level of foreign direct investments in countries such as Croatia and Bulgaria that are part of the EU and the countries aspiring to join the EU with special emphasis in the case of the Republic of Macedonia.The importance of correlation between the quality of business environment and attraction of foreign direct investment is linked closely with the aspiration of the countries of West Balkans for integration into the EU as a precondition have the fulfillment of the Maastricht and Copenhagen criteria. …","PeriodicalId":52427,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS16611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

IntroductionThe complex political and economic transition in the countries of the Western Balkans in the past two decades has been accompanied by numerous economic and political asymmetrical strokes.During this complex process the governments of the countries of the Western Balkans (WB) with the assistance of the IMF and World Bank implemented the economic policies that aimed to achieve macroeconomic stabilization, transformation and privatization of state owned enterprises and to reform the economic system and public institutions.After two decades of implementation of intensive economic policies the countries of the Western Balkan have achieved macroeconomic stabilization but the results in reforming the economy, reforming the public sector and the public institutions are in insufficient level and continue to remain challenges for these countries in the future.In fact, the asymmetric development during the previous system and the low levels of economical growth in the first decade of the transition followed by increasing levels of unemployment, poverty, the large informal sector and fiscal evasion were the main obstacles in implementing deep institutional reforms and establishing a functional market economy in the Western Balkan's (Osmani & Mazllami, 2014).The process of economic and political transition in the Western Balkans due to achieved asymmetric results do not solve in approriate level three main problems of economic transition (Commander, 1991).1) Finding a new balance between private sector and public sector,2) Finding the balance between profits and wages in the private sector, and3) Finding the balance between monetary and fiscal policy within the strategy that aim macroeconomic stabilization and economic development.Three balances realized at transition countries of the Western Balkans are in suboptimal levels as a result of numerous deficits and economic and social problems, lack of voluminous local and foreign investment and significant delays in the implementation of economic and institutional reforms as a result of lack of national political consensus.Delays and poor quality of structural reforms still remain as the major obstacles in attracting foreign investment although as serious progress was made in terms of creating a more favorable environment business largely of formal nature.As a consequence, that indicator "Ease of Doing Business" does not include areas such as: the level of corruption, independence of the judiciary, the size of the market, political and economic risk and functionality of public institutions, this indicator does not reflect the full attractiveness of business environement as crutial precondition in attracting foreign direct investment.Despite the fact that Macedonia on the basis of the indicator, Doing Business, in the period 2010-2015 is listed as a leader in the West Balkans, country has realized the lowest level of foreign direct investment in volume and quality compared to the West Balkans and EU countries.Due to the low level of foreign direct investment, the lack of national investment, the hesitation of the banking sector in financing new investments as a result of the growth of bad loans and considerable reduction of economic remittances Macedonia remains as the country with the highes level of unemployment and poverty in Europe.The research aims to analyze the correlation between the level of ranking of countries according to the indicator, Doing Business, and the level of foreign direct investments in countries such as Croatia and Bulgaria that are part of the EU and the countries aspiring to join the EU with special emphasis in the case of the Republic of Macedonia.The importance of correlation between the quality of business environment and attraction of foreign direct investment is linked closely with the aspiration of the countries of West Balkans for integration into the EU as a precondition have the fulfillment of the Maastricht and Copenhagen criteria. …
改善西巴尔干地区的商业环境和外国直接投资
在过去的二十年里,西巴尔干国家复杂的政治和经济转型伴随着许多经济和政治的不对称。在这一复杂过程中,西巴尔干各国政府在国际货币基金组织和世界银行的协助下执行了旨在实现宏观经济稳定、国有企业转型和私有化以及改革经济制度和公共机构的经济政策。在实施密集的经济政策二十年后,西巴尔干各国实现了宏观经济的稳定,但改革经济、改革公共部门和公共机构方面的成果还不够充分,今后仍将是这些国家面临的挑战。事实上,前一体系的不对称发展和转型第一个十年的低水平经济增长,随后失业、贫困、大型非正规部门和财政逃税水平不断上升,是西巴尔干实施深度体制改革和建立功能性市场经济的主要障碍(Osmani & Mazllami, 2014)。由于取得了不对称的结果,西巴尔干地区的经济和政治转型过程没有在适当的水平上解决经济转型的三个主要问题(Commander, 1991)。1)在私营部门和公共部门之间找到新的平衡,2)在私营部门中找到利润和工资之间的平衡,以及3)在旨在宏观经济稳定和经济发展的战略中找到货币和财政政策之间的平衡。由于许多赤字和经济及社会问题、缺乏大量的当地和外国投资以及由于缺乏国家政治协商一致意见而在执行经济和体制改革方面严重拖延,西巴尔干过渡国家实现的三项平衡处于次优水平。结构改革的延误和质量差仍然是吸引外国投资的主要障碍,尽管在创造一个更有利的环境方面取得了重大进展,主要是正式性质的商业。因此,“营商便利度”这一指标不包括腐败程度、司法独立、市场规模、政治和经济风险以及公共机构的功能等领域,这一指标没有反映出作为吸引外国直接投资的关键先决条件的商业环境的充分吸引力。尽管马其顿在2010-2015年的营商环境指标中被列为西巴尔干地区的领导者,但与西巴尔干和欧盟国家相比,该国在数量和质量上实现了最低水平的外国直接投资。由于外国直接投资水平低,缺乏国家投资,由于不良贷款的增长和经济汇款的大量减少,银行部门在为新投资融资方面犹豫不决,马其顿仍然是欧洲失业率和贫困率最高的国家。这项研究的目的是分析各国根据“营商环境”指标的排名水平与克罗地亚和保加利亚等欧盟成员国和希望加入欧盟的国家的外国直接投资水平之间的相关性,并特别强调马其顿共和国的情况。商业环境的质量与吸引外国直接投资之间的相互关系的重要性与西巴尔干国家将加入欧盟作为实现马斯特里赫特和哥本哈根标准的先决条件的愿望密切相关。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信