THEORETICAL AND LEGAL PARADIGMS OF BANKRUPTCY REGULATION

A.J. Frantsuz, N.V. Holovata
{"title":"THEORETICAL AND LEGAL PARADIGMS OF BANKRUPTCY REGULATION","authors":"A.J. Frantsuz, N.V. Holovata","doi":"10.31732/2708-339x-2022-06-24-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the legal problems regulation and practical application of legislation that regulate the bankruptcy procedure. National instability economy and declining production predicts a clear the trend of the payment crisis and a significant increase in the number enterprises that are being liquidated in bankruptcy proceedings. The Law of Ukraine \"On Bankruptcy\" was one of the first laws that were adopted in the CIS countries and regulated relations insolvency of economic entities. Unfortunately, the above law is not a model of the normative act in in the field of legal regulation of bankruptcy. A large number of shortcomings were identified by case law. Regulatory framework, which regulates the institution of bankruptcy, needs both expansion and improve. To date, no changes have been made to many legislation governing bankruptcy proceedings, as well as legal relations of the parties and participants in the bankruptcy. In addition, it is missing bylaws that would be properly regulated the mechanism of practical application of this procedures in Ukraine. Formation of national legislation in Ukraine is facing difficulties that are causing it legal problems caused primarily by objective ones (economic, social, political) and subjective factors. One of the main objective causes legal problems are manifested in the fact that the adoption of some legislative acts took place in the conditions of the existence of obsolete pre-reform legislation, which developed during the reign state property as the basis of the economic system and principle democratic centralism in the management of the economy. And though the conducted economic reform nevertheless brought certain democratic principles in the legal regulation of economic relations, however, some inconsistencies with the legislation of the period administrative-command economy has not been eliminated. Contradictions of the law not only lead to legal problems in regulating economic relations, but sometimes is directly the cause of offenses and abuses by business entities. In addition, the lack of clear and unambiguous concept on the way to further market development economy in Ukraine puts the legislator in a difficult position and causes problems in the development and adoption of new, modern bills. It was found that some regulations on at the time of adoption were designed to regulate non-existent or underdeveloped social relations.","PeriodicalId":76144,"journal":{"name":"Medico-legal bulletin","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medico-legal bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31732/2708-339x-2022-06-24-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the legal problems regulation and practical application of legislation that regulate the bankruptcy procedure. National instability economy and declining production predicts a clear the trend of the payment crisis and a significant increase in the number enterprises that are being liquidated in bankruptcy proceedings. The Law of Ukraine "On Bankruptcy" was one of the first laws that were adopted in the CIS countries and regulated relations insolvency of economic entities. Unfortunately, the above law is not a model of the normative act in in the field of legal regulation of bankruptcy. A large number of shortcomings were identified by case law. Regulatory framework, which regulates the institution of bankruptcy, needs both expansion and improve. To date, no changes have been made to many legislation governing bankruptcy proceedings, as well as legal relations of the parties and participants in the bankruptcy. In addition, it is missing bylaws that would be properly regulated the mechanism of practical application of this procedures in Ukraine. Formation of national legislation in Ukraine is facing difficulties that are causing it legal problems caused primarily by objective ones (economic, social, political) and subjective factors. One of the main objective causes legal problems are manifested in the fact that the adoption of some legislative acts took place in the conditions of the existence of obsolete pre-reform legislation, which developed during the reign state property as the basis of the economic system and principle democratic centralism in the management of the economy. And though the conducted economic reform nevertheless brought certain democratic principles in the legal regulation of economic relations, however, some inconsistencies with the legislation of the period administrative-command economy has not been eliminated. Contradictions of the law not only lead to legal problems in regulating economic relations, but sometimes is directly the cause of offenses and abuses by business entities. In addition, the lack of clear and unambiguous concept on the way to further market development economy in Ukraine puts the legislator in a difficult position and causes problems in the development and adoption of new, modern bills. It was found that some regulations on at the time of adoption were designed to regulate non-existent or underdeveloped social relations.
破产规制的理论与法律范式
本文分析了破产程序规制的法律问题、规制和立法的实际应用。国家经济的不稳定和生产的下降预示着支付危机的趋势明显,破产清算的企业数量明显增加。乌克兰“破产法”是独联体国家第一批通过的法律之一,规定了经济实体破产的关系。遗憾的是,在破产法律规制领域,上述法律并不是规范行为的典范。判例法发现了大量的缺陷。监管破产制度的监管框架既需要扩张,也需要完善。迄今为止,许多有关破产程序的立法以及破产当事人和参与人的法律关系都没有改变。此外,还缺少能够适当规范乌克兰实际应用这一程序的机制的章程。乌克兰国家立法的形成正面临困难,这些困难使其产生主要由客观因素(经济、社会、政治)和主观因素引起的法律问题。法律问题的主要客观原因之一,表现在一些立法行为是在改革前立法陈旧的条件下通过的,改革前立法以国有财产为经济制度的基础,以民主集中制为经济管理的原则。经济改革虽然在经济关系的法律规制中带来了一定的民主原则,但与行政命令经济时期立法的不一致仍未消除。法律的矛盾不仅导致经济关系调节中的法律问题,有时还直接导致企业主体的违法和滥用行为。此外,乌克兰在进一步发展市场经济的道路上缺乏明确和明确的概念,使立法者陷入困境,并在制定和通过新的现代法案方面造成问题。研究发现,一些关于收养时的规定旨在规范不存在或不发达的社会关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信