Some instrumental effects in the determination of stable carbon isotope ratios by gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry

P.A. Eakin, A.E. Fallick, J. Gerc
{"title":"Some instrumental effects in the determination of stable carbon isotope ratios by gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry","authors":"P.A. Eakin,&nbsp;A.E. Fallick,&nbsp;J. Gerc","doi":"10.1016/0009-2541(92)90204-I","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Some sources of instrumental errors in the determination of<sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C in organic compounds by gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) have been investigated. For mass 44 ion beam intensities in the range 1·10<sup>−10</sup> to 1·10<sup>−8</sup> A, mass-spectrometric pressure effects do not significantly affect data accuracy, thus obviating the necessity of matching sample and reference ion beam intensities for each compound in a complex sample. Data quality is influenced by: (a) the quality of the furnace-tube packing; and (b) the performance of the cryogenic trap. On analysis of large (70 ng) samples, precisions (1σ) of⩽ ± 0.23‰ were obtained using 0.35–0.5-mm-grade CuO. However, there was a marked deterioration in precision (1σ⪯ ± 0.62) when coarse CuO (0.35–1 mm grade) was tested. Use of fine CuO also permits analysis of smaller samples. Inefficient trapping, and release of water during overnight defrosting leads to erroneously lowδ<sup>13</sup>C-values, accuracies of −1.1 to −0.25‰ resulting from analysis of 70-ng samples. Accuracy error increases to⩽1.86‰ on analysis of 10-ng samples. Efficient water trapping combined with the improvements in furnace performance results in precisions generally much better than±0.4‰ and accuracies better than±0.65‰ for high-molecular-weight compounds (268–338 amu), and very accurate and precise results (better than±0.2‰) for lower-molecular-weight compounds (142–173 amu).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100231,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section","volume":"101 1","pages":"Pages 71-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0009-2541(92)90204-I","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000925419290204I","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Some sources of instrumental errors in the determination of13C/12C in organic compounds by gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) have been investigated. For mass 44 ion beam intensities in the range 1·10−10 to 1·10−8 A, mass-spectrometric pressure effects do not significantly affect data accuracy, thus obviating the necessity of matching sample and reference ion beam intensities for each compound in a complex sample. Data quality is influenced by: (a) the quality of the furnace-tube packing; and (b) the performance of the cryogenic trap. On analysis of large (70 ng) samples, precisions (1σ) of⩽ ± 0.23‰ were obtained using 0.35–0.5-mm-grade CuO. However, there was a marked deterioration in precision (1σ⪯ ± 0.62) when coarse CuO (0.35–1 mm grade) was tested. Use of fine CuO also permits analysis of smaller samples. Inefficient trapping, and release of water during overnight defrosting leads to erroneously lowδ13C-values, accuracies of −1.1 to −0.25‰ resulting from analysis of 70-ng samples. Accuracy error increases to⩽1.86‰ on analysis of 10-ng samples. Efficient water trapping combined with the improvements in furnace performance results in precisions generally much better than±0.4‰ and accuracies better than±0.65‰ for high-molecular-weight compounds (268–338 amu), and very accurate and precise results (better than±0.2‰) for lower-molecular-weight compounds (142–173 amu).

气相色谱-同位素比质谱法测定稳定碳同位素比中的一些仪器效应
研究了气相色谱-同位素比质谱法测定有机化合物中13c /12C的仪器误差来源。对于质量为44的离子束强度在1·10−10至1·10−8 A范围内,质谱压力效应不会显著影响数据精度,从而避免了对复杂样品中每种化合物的样品和参考离子束强度进行匹配的必要性。影响数据质量的因素有:(a)炉管填料的质量;(b)低温捕集器的性能。对于大样品(70 ng),使用0.35 - 0.5 mm级CuO,精密度(1σ)为≤±0.23‰。然而,当测试粗CuO (0.35-1 mm级)时,精度明显下降(1σ⪯±0.62)。使用细CuO也可以分析较小的样品。在夜间除霜期间,低效率的捕获和水释放导致错误的低δ 13c值,分析70-ng样品的精度为- 1.1至- 0.25‰。在分析10-ng样品时,精度误差增加到≥1.86‰。高效的捕水结合炉体性能的改进,对高分子量化合物(268-338 amu)的精密度通常比±0.4‰好得多,准确度比±0.65‰好得多,对低分子量化合物(142-173 amu)的结果非常准确和精确(优于±0.2‰)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信