Postpartum Readmission for Hypertension: The Patient Experience [ID: 1377602]

Radhika Viswanathan, Saba H. Berhie, Sarah Little, Ellen W. Seely, Louise E. Wilkins-Haug
{"title":"Postpartum Readmission for Hypertension: The Patient Experience [ID: 1377602]","authors":"Radhika Viswanathan, Saba H. Berhie, Sarah Little, Ellen W. Seely, Louise E. Wilkins-Haug","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930624.77303.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are the most common cause of postpartum readmission. Prior research has led to the creation of clinical guidelines for postpartum management; however, the patient experience is often missing from this work. The objective of this project is to understand the perspective of patients readmitted for postpartum hypertension. METHODS: Institutional review board committee approval was obtained for the study. This was a qualitative study with data generated through semistructured interviews. Patients readmitted with postpartum HDP at an urban academic medical center were approached and consented for a single interview. The same researcher conducted all interviews and patient recruitment continued until thematic saturation was reached (n=9). Two coders coded all interviews using NVivo software with both deductive and inductive coding processes. Discrepancies were discussed and resolved with consensus. Researchers identified themes through grounded theory and were reflexive in their thematic generation. RESULTS: Five themes were generated through the grounded theory analysis: Every pregnancy is different, symptoms of preeclampsia are easily dismissed or often not taken seriously, miscommunication regarding medical changes can hinder patient care, readmission logistics are not baby-friendly, and patient well-being improved when conversations acknowledged the struggles of readmission. CONCLUSION: A qualitative research process revealed patient-identified gaps in care that may have led to readmission for HDP. The specific recommendations that emerge from these themes include: addressing barriers to blood pressure management prior to discharge, improving postpartum discharge follow-up, providing newborn care coordination, and improving counseling on the risk of postpartum preeclampsia during discharge. Incorporating these patient perspectives in hospital discharge policy can be helpful in creating patient-centered systems of care and may help reduce rates of readmission.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930624.77303.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are the most common cause of postpartum readmission. Prior research has led to the creation of clinical guidelines for postpartum management; however, the patient experience is often missing from this work. The objective of this project is to understand the perspective of patients readmitted for postpartum hypertension. METHODS: Institutional review board committee approval was obtained for the study. This was a qualitative study with data generated through semistructured interviews. Patients readmitted with postpartum HDP at an urban academic medical center were approached and consented for a single interview. The same researcher conducted all interviews and patient recruitment continued until thematic saturation was reached (n=9). Two coders coded all interviews using NVivo software with both deductive and inductive coding processes. Discrepancies were discussed and resolved with consensus. Researchers identified themes through grounded theory and were reflexive in their thematic generation. RESULTS: Five themes were generated through the grounded theory analysis: Every pregnancy is different, symptoms of preeclampsia are easily dismissed or often not taken seriously, miscommunication regarding medical changes can hinder patient care, readmission logistics are not baby-friendly, and patient well-being improved when conversations acknowledged the struggles of readmission. CONCLUSION: A qualitative research process revealed patient-identified gaps in care that may have led to readmission for HDP. The specific recommendations that emerge from these themes include: addressing barriers to blood pressure management prior to discharge, improving postpartum discharge follow-up, providing newborn care coordination, and improving counseling on the risk of postpartum preeclampsia during discharge. Incorporating these patient perspectives in hospital discharge policy can be helpful in creating patient-centered systems of care and may help reduce rates of readmission.
高血压产后再入院:患者体验[ID: 1377602]
妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP)是最常见的产后再入院原因。先前的研究已经导致了产后管理临床指南的创建;然而,在这项工作中,病人的经历常常被忽略。本项目的目的是了解因产后高血压再次入院的患者的观点。方法:本研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。这是一项通过半结构化访谈生成数据的定性研究。在城市学术医疗中心再次入院的产后HDP患者被接触并同意进行一次访谈。同一研究人员进行了所有访谈,并继续招募患者,直到主题饱和(n=9)。两名编码员使用NVivo软件对所有访谈进行演绎和归纳编码。对差异进行了讨论并协商一致解决。研究人员通过扎根理论确定主题,并在主题生成过程中产生反身性。结果:通过理论分析得出五个主题:每次妊娠都不同,子痫前期的症状很容易被忽视或经常不被重视,关于医疗变化的误解会阻碍患者护理,再入院后勤不适合婴儿,当谈话承认再入院的困难时,患者的幸福感得到改善。结论:一项定性研究过程揭示了患者确定的护理差距可能导致HDP再入院。从这些主题中产生的具体建议包括:解决出院前血压管理的障碍,改善产后出院随访,提供新生儿护理协调,以及改善出院时产后先兆子痫风险的咨询。将这些患者观点纳入出院政策有助于建立以患者为中心的护理系统,并可能有助于降低再入院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信