Single-zircon dating by step-wise Pb evaporation: Comparison with other geochronological techniques applied to the Hercynian granites of Corsica, France

A. Cocherie, C. Guerrot, Ph. Rossi
{"title":"Single-zircon dating by step-wise Pb evaporation: Comparison with other geochronological techniques applied to the Hercynian granites of Corsica, France","authors":"A. Cocherie,&nbsp;C. Guerrot,&nbsp;Ph. Rossi","doi":"10.1016/0009-2541(92)90210-V","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Corsican Batholith provides an opportunity to test the single-zircon evaporation technique developed by B. Kober for Hercynian times. In this paper we attempt to clarify the method of calculating<sup>207</sup>Pb<sup>*</sup>/<sup>206</sup>Pb<sup>*</sup> ages and errors. The significance of the<sup>207</sup>Pb<sup>*</sup>/<sup>206</sup>Pb<sup>*</sup> ages are discussed with particular reference to the determination of the crystallization age of plutons. Zircon morphology is clearly an important criterion in selecting grains for analysis. Geological relations in the example that we are using are firmly established, enabling discussion of the<sup>207</sup>Pb<sup>*</sup>/<sup>206</sup>Pb<sup>*</sup> model age in the light of previous age determinations using other methods (Rb<img>Sr,<sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar and conventional U<img>Pb).</p><p>We interpret the well-defined322±12-Ma<sup>207</sup>Pb<sup>*</sup>/<sup>206</sup>Pb<sup>*</sup> age as the time of the crystallization of the U<sub>1</sub>, Mg<img>K rocks. This is in good agreement with Rb<img>Sr ages of the younger units U<sub>2a</sub> and U<sub>2b</sub> (312±9and290±6Ma, respectively).</p><p>Lead model ages on single-zircon crystals can be very precise and can give geologically more meaningful ages than those given by other methods, including the bulk-fraction conventional U<img>Pb method. The problem of episodic loss of radiogenic Pb can be avoided, making the grain concordant, and inherited grains or cores are easily detected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100231,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section","volume":"101 1","pages":"Pages 131-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0009-2541(92)90210-V","citationCount":"125","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000925419290210V","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 125

Abstract

The Corsican Batholith provides an opportunity to test the single-zircon evaporation technique developed by B. Kober for Hercynian times. In this paper we attempt to clarify the method of calculating207Pb*/206Pb* ages and errors. The significance of the207Pb*/206Pb* ages are discussed with particular reference to the determination of the crystallization age of plutons. Zircon morphology is clearly an important criterion in selecting grains for analysis. Geological relations in the example that we are using are firmly established, enabling discussion of the207Pb*/206Pb* model age in the light of previous age determinations using other methods (RbSr,40Ar/39Ar and conventional UPb).

We interpret the well-defined322±12-Ma207Pb*/206Pb* age as the time of the crystallization of the U1, MgK rocks. This is in good agreement with RbSr ages of the younger units U2a and U2b (312±9and290±6Ma, respectively).

Lead model ages on single-zircon crystals can be very precise and can give geologically more meaningful ages than those given by other methods, including the bulk-fraction conventional UPb method. The problem of episodic loss of radiogenic Pb can be avoided, making the grain concordant, and inherited grains or cores are easily detected.

单锆石逐级Pb蒸发测年:与法国科西嘉海西期花岗岩的其他地质年代学方法的比较
科西嘉岩基为测试b.k ober在海西期开发的单锆石蒸发技术提供了机会。本文试图阐明207pb */206Pb*年龄的计算方法及其误差。讨论了207pb */206Pb*年龄的意义,并特别讨论了钚结晶年龄的测定。锆石形态显然是选择分析粒度的重要依据。我们使用的例子中的地质关系是牢固建立的,可以根据之前使用其他方法(RbSr,40Ar/39Ar和常规UPb)确定的年龄来讨论207pb */206Pb*模型年龄。我们将322±12-Ma207Pb*/206Pb*年龄解释为U1, MgK岩石的结晶时间。这与较年轻单元U2a和U2b的RbSr年龄(分别为312±9ma和290±6Ma)很好地吻合。单个锆石晶体上的铅模型年龄可以非常精确,并且可以比其他方法(包括体积分数传统的UPb方法)给出更有地质意义的年龄。避免了放射性成因铅的偶发性损失问题,使籽粒一致,易于检测遗传粒或核。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信