Modularity of Mind and Second Language Acquisition

Houman Bijani, A. Nahvi
{"title":"Modularity of Mind and Second Language Acquisition","authors":"Houman Bijani, A. Nahvi","doi":"10.4304/TPLS.2.8.1656-1661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of modularity has become significant in philosophy and psychology since the early 1980s, following the publication of Fodor's ground-breaking book The Modularity of Mind (1983). In the twenty-five years since the term ‘module’ and its cognates first entered the lexicon of cognitive science, the conceptual and theoretical landscape in this area has changed thoroughly. A critical issue in this regard has been the development of evolutionary psychology, whose proponents argue that the architecture of the mind is more pervasively modular than the Fodorian perspective allows. Where Fodor (2005) draws the line of modularity at the low-level systems underlying perception and language, post-Fodorian theorists such as Carruthers (2008) contend that the mind is modular through and through, that is, up to and including the high-level systems responsible for thought. The concept of modularity has also played a role in recent debates in epistemology, philosophy of language, and other core areas of philosophy.","PeriodicalId":23004,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice in Language Studies","volume":"206 1","pages":"1656-1661"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice in Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4304/TPLS.2.8.1656-1661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The concept of modularity has become significant in philosophy and psychology since the early 1980s, following the publication of Fodor's ground-breaking book The Modularity of Mind (1983). In the twenty-five years since the term ‘module’ and its cognates first entered the lexicon of cognitive science, the conceptual and theoretical landscape in this area has changed thoroughly. A critical issue in this regard has been the development of evolutionary psychology, whose proponents argue that the architecture of the mind is more pervasively modular than the Fodorian perspective allows. Where Fodor (2005) draws the line of modularity at the low-level systems underlying perception and language, post-Fodorian theorists such as Carruthers (2008) contend that the mind is modular through and through, that is, up to and including the high-level systems responsible for thought. The concept of modularity has also played a role in recent debates in epistemology, philosophy of language, and other core areas of philosophy.
思维模块化与第二语言习得
自20世纪80年代早期以来,随着Fodor开创性的著作《心智的模块化》(1983)的出版,模块化的概念在哲学和心理学中变得重要起来。自“模块”及其同源词首次进入认知科学词汇以来的25年里,这一领域的概念和理论格局发生了彻底的变化。这方面的一个关键问题是进化心理学的发展,其支持者认为,心灵的架构比福多里安观点所允许的更普遍地模块化。Fodor(2005)在底层感知和语言系统中划分了模块化的界限,而后fodorian理论家,如Carruthers(2008),则认为心智是完全模块化的,也就是说,直到并包括负责思考的高级系统。模块化的概念在最近的认识论、语言哲学和其他哲学核心领域的辩论中也发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信