Comparison of Approval Status of COVID-19 Vaccines and Treatments in Korea, the US, and Europe

Yeon-Kyeng Lee, Eui-Kyung Lee
{"title":"Comparison of Approval Status of COVID-19 Vaccines and Treatments in Korea, the US, and Europe","authors":"Yeon-Kyeng Lee, Eui-Kyung Lee","doi":"10.17480/psk.2023.67.3.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As demand for COVID-19 vaccines and treatments has soared, each country has applied appropriate approval/authorization system according to circumstances, such as emergency use authorization, conditional marketing approval, or other rapid procedures to introduce COVID-19 related items quickly. This study compared and analyzed the approval/authorization status of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments in Korea, the United States, and Europe. There were differences in the number and types of approved vaccines and treatments and also in the approval procedures used across countries. The United States adopted the emergency use authorization system, and Europe utilized the conditional marketing authorisation system, while Korea mainly applied conditional approval for vaccines and emergency use authorization for treatments. After initial approval in the US, Europe, most vaccines and treatments were introduced with delay in Korea. For instance, the average of Drug lag time for vaccines was about two months(61.5days). In the case of treatments, the difference between Drug lag time among items was relatively large. Considering that Korea's review period for drug approval is similar to that of the United States or Europe, it is necessary to proceed more quickly with approval applications and emergency authorization reviews in the event of other public health emergencies in the future.","PeriodicalId":23923,"journal":{"name":"Yakhak Hoeji","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yakhak Hoeji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17480/psk.2023.67.3.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As demand for COVID-19 vaccines and treatments has soared, each country has applied appropriate approval/authorization system according to circumstances, such as emergency use authorization, conditional marketing approval, or other rapid procedures to introduce COVID-19 related items quickly. This study compared and analyzed the approval/authorization status of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments in Korea, the United States, and Europe. There were differences in the number and types of approved vaccines and treatments and also in the approval procedures used across countries. The United States adopted the emergency use authorization system, and Europe utilized the conditional marketing authorisation system, while Korea mainly applied conditional approval for vaccines and emergency use authorization for treatments. After initial approval in the US, Europe, most vaccines and treatments were introduced with delay in Korea. For instance, the average of Drug lag time for vaccines was about two months(61.5days). In the case of treatments, the difference between Drug lag time among items was relatively large. Considering that Korea's review period for drug approval is similar to that of the United States or Europe, it is necessary to proceed more quickly with approval applications and emergency authorization reviews in the event of other public health emergencies in the future.
韩国、美国、欧洲新冠肺炎疫苗和治疗方法批准情况的比较
随着对COVID-19疫苗和治疗方法的需求激增,各国根据实际情况采用了适当的审批/授权制度,如紧急使用授权、有条件上市批准或其他快速程序,以快速引入COVID-19相关项目。本研究对比分析了韩国、美国和欧洲新冠肺炎疫苗和治疗方法的批准/授权状况。各国在批准的疫苗和治疗方法的数量和类型以及使用的批准程序方面存在差异。美国采用紧急使用许可制度,欧洲采用有条件上市许可制度,韩国主要采用疫苗有条件批准和治疗紧急使用许可制度。在美国和欧洲获得初步批准后,大部分疫苗和治疗方法在韩国被推迟了。例如,疫苗的药物滞后时间平均约为2个月(61.5天)。在治疗的情况下,各项目之间的药物滞后时间差异较大。考虑到韩国的药品审批期限与美国或欧洲相似,今后如果发生其他突发公共卫生事件,有必要加快审批申请和紧急授权审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信