National identification and control of corruption mediated by socioemotional climate, collective efficacy, and trust in Chilean students: an experimental study

Fuad Hatibovic, Isabel Pinto, D. Páez
{"title":"National identification and control of corruption mediated by socioemotional climate, collective efficacy, and trust in Chilean students: an experimental study","authors":"Fuad Hatibovic, Isabel Pinto, D. Páez","doi":"10.18800/psico.202301.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the relationship between successful dealing with deviant acts (i.e., acts of corruption) and social cohesion. We conducted an experimental research with 148 university students based on the subjective group dynamics theory. We informed the research participants of some corruption cases in Chile (ingroup) and Argentina (outgroup) during the last year, with two modes of efficiency in their legal control: high efficiency (95% of the cases were judged and sanctioned) and low efficiency (5% of the cases were judged and sanctioned). The mediational analysis shows that the induced ingroup effectiveness causes a better emotional climate, greater perceived collective efficiency in dealing with deviance, increases confidence in social control and reinforces national identification. We conducted a comparative analysis with a sample of Portuguese university students, finding that Chilean students have a more critical view of collective effectiveness in dealing with deviance and a moderate level of national identification. The results are related to the assumptions of the subjective group dynamics theory and show the psychosocial effects of uncontrolled and unsanctioned corruption.","PeriodicalId":21224,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica","volume":"223 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202301.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between successful dealing with deviant acts (i.e., acts of corruption) and social cohesion. We conducted an experimental research with 148 university students based on the subjective group dynamics theory. We informed the research participants of some corruption cases in Chile (ingroup) and Argentina (outgroup) during the last year, with two modes of efficiency in their legal control: high efficiency (95% of the cases were judged and sanctioned) and low efficiency (5% of the cases were judged and sanctioned). The mediational analysis shows that the induced ingroup effectiveness causes a better emotional climate, greater perceived collective efficiency in dealing with deviance, increases confidence in social control and reinforces national identification. We conducted a comparative analysis with a sample of Portuguese university students, finding that Chilean students have a more critical view of collective effectiveness in dealing with deviance and a moderate level of national identification. The results are related to the assumptions of the subjective group dynamics theory and show the psychosocial effects of uncontrolled and unsanctioned corruption.
智利学生的社会情绪气候、集体效能和信任对腐败的国家认同和控制:一项实验研究
本文分析了成功处理越轨行为(即腐败行为)与社会凝聚力之间的关系。基于主观群体动力学理论,我们对148名大学生进行了实验研究。我们向研究参与者介绍了去年智利(内组)和阿根廷(外组)的一些腐败案件,它们的法律控制有两种效率模式:高效率(95%的案件被审判和制裁)和低效率(5%的案件被审判和制裁)。中介分析显示,诱导的内群体效能能改善情绪氛围,提高处理越轨行为的集体效率,增加社会控制的信心,强化国家认同。我们与葡萄牙大学生样本进行了比较分析,发现智利学生对处理越轨行为的集体有效性有更批判性的看法,并且具有中等水平的国家认同。结果与主观群体动力学理论的假设有关,并显示了不受控制和未经批准的腐败的社会心理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信