Evaluation of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid FNAC in Rural Setup

Sanjay Khandekar
{"title":"Evaluation of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid FNAC in Rural Setup","authors":"Sanjay Khandekar","doi":"10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and Objectives: The present research was undertaken to study the diagnostic utility of TBSRTC at our institution and correlate the cytological diagnosis with the histological diagnosis wherever available. \nMethods: A total of 108 patients with thyroid swellings were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) during a period of 10 months i.e. from January 2016 to October 2016 were included in the study. Out of these 31 patients (28.70%) underwent surgery subsequently and histopathological examination was done. Cytological diagnosis was compared with histopathology diagnosis wherever it was available. \nResults: Out of 108 patients, majority were females (87.03%) and in younger age group (n = 66 [61.11%], 21–40 years). The FNAC diagnosis was categorized as unsatisfactory (2.77%), benign (87.03%), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (0.92%), Follicular/ Hurthle cell neoplasm (4.62%), suspicious for malignancy (0.92%) and malignant (3.70%). The malignancy rate for benign category was 4.5%, 20% for follicular neoplasm, 100% for each suspicious for malignancy and malignant category. 29 cases (93.54%) out of 31 had a consistent cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis while 2 cases (6.45%) showed discordance. There was a good correlation between cytological and histopathological diagnosis. \nConclusion: The Bethesda system is very useful standardized system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. It improves communication between cytopathologist's and clinicians, leading to more consistent management approaches.","PeriodicalId":13848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","volume":"94 1","pages":"229-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: The present research was undertaken to study the diagnostic utility of TBSRTC at our institution and correlate the cytological diagnosis with the histological diagnosis wherever available. Methods: A total of 108 patients with thyroid swellings were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) during a period of 10 months i.e. from January 2016 to October 2016 were included in the study. Out of these 31 patients (28.70%) underwent surgery subsequently and histopathological examination was done. Cytological diagnosis was compared with histopathology diagnosis wherever it was available. Results: Out of 108 patients, majority were females (87.03%) and in younger age group (n = 66 [61.11%], 21–40 years). The FNAC diagnosis was categorized as unsatisfactory (2.77%), benign (87.03%), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (0.92%), Follicular/ Hurthle cell neoplasm (4.62%), suspicious for malignancy (0.92%) and malignant (3.70%). The malignancy rate for benign category was 4.5%, 20% for follicular neoplasm, 100% for each suspicious for malignancy and malignant category. 29 cases (93.54%) out of 31 had a consistent cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis while 2 cases (6.45%) showed discordance. There was a good correlation between cytological and histopathological diagnosis. Conclusion: The Bethesda system is very useful standardized system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. It improves communication between cytopathologist's and clinicians, leading to more consistent management approaches.
农村地区甲状腺FNAC报告Bethesda系统的评价
目的和目的:本研究旨在研究TBSRTC在我院的诊断效用,并将细胞学诊断与组织学诊断联系起来。方法:选取2016年1月至2016年10月10个月期间,对108例甲状腺肿大患者行细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)。31例(28.70%)患者均行手术治疗并行组织病理学检查。将细胞学诊断与组织病理学诊断进行比较。结果:108例患者中,以女性(87.03%)居多,年龄较小(n = 66[61.11%], 21 ~ 40岁)。FNAC诊断为不满意(2.77%)、良性(87.03%)、非典型性(0.92%)、滤泡/ Hurthle细胞肿瘤(4.62%)、可疑恶性(0.92%)和恶性(3.70%)。良性分类为4.5%,滤泡性肿瘤为20%,可疑恶性及恶性分类均为100%。31例细胞学诊断与组织学诊断一致29例(93.54%),不一致2例(6.45%)。细胞学和组织病理学诊断有很好的相关性。结论:Bethesda系统是一种实用的甲状腺细胞病理报告标准化系统。它改善了细胞病理学家和临床医生之间的沟通,导致更一致的管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信