Involvement of calmodulin inhibition in analgesia induced with low doses of intrathecal trifluoperazine.

S. Golbidi, H. Moriuchi, T. Irie, T. Ghafghazi, V. Hajhashemi
{"title":"Involvement of calmodulin inhibition in analgesia induced with low doses of intrathecal trifluoperazine.","authors":"S. Golbidi, H. Moriuchi, T. Irie, T. Ghafghazi, V. Hajhashemi","doi":"10.1254/JJP.88.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examined which of the known properties of trifluoperazine, including calmodulin inhibition, are involved in its analgesic effect. Furthermore, we tried to find any possible interaction between opioidergic system and calmodulin inhibition-induced analgesia. Intrathecal trifluoperazine (1, 10, 100 microg) showed a biphasic effect in the formalin test; i.e., analgesia at relatively low doses (1, 10 microg) and hyperalgesia at a high dose (100 microg). No analgesic effects were observed after intrathecal injection of sulpiride (1, 10, 100 microg), atropine (0.1, 1, 10 microg), phentolamine (0.1, 1, 10 microg) and brompheniramine (0.1, 1, 10 microg). Meanwhile, intrathecal calmidazolium (10, 50, 250 microg) induced a dose-dependent analgesia. Histamine (1 microg), physostigmine (1 microg), bromocriptine (1 microg) and norepinephrine (1 microg) did not affect trifluoperazine-induced analgesia. Calcium (20 microg) attenuated the antinociceptive effect of trifluoperazine and inhibited the analgesic effect of calmidazolium. Finally, naloxone (2 mg/kg) decreased trifluoperazine-induced antinociception but did not have any effects on calmidazolium-induced analgesia. We concluded that calmodulin inhibition may be involved in the analgesia produced by trifluoperazine. With increasing doses of trifluoperazine, the algesic effect seems to overcome the analgesic effect. It is also suggested that the opioidergic system does not interact with calmodulin inhibition-induced analgesia even though this system has a possible role in trifluoperazine-induced analgesia.","PeriodicalId":14750,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of pharmacology","volume":"34 1","pages":"151-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1254/JJP.88.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We examined which of the known properties of trifluoperazine, including calmodulin inhibition, are involved in its analgesic effect. Furthermore, we tried to find any possible interaction between opioidergic system and calmodulin inhibition-induced analgesia. Intrathecal trifluoperazine (1, 10, 100 microg) showed a biphasic effect in the formalin test; i.e., analgesia at relatively low doses (1, 10 microg) and hyperalgesia at a high dose (100 microg). No analgesic effects were observed after intrathecal injection of sulpiride (1, 10, 100 microg), atropine (0.1, 1, 10 microg), phentolamine (0.1, 1, 10 microg) and brompheniramine (0.1, 1, 10 microg). Meanwhile, intrathecal calmidazolium (10, 50, 250 microg) induced a dose-dependent analgesia. Histamine (1 microg), physostigmine (1 microg), bromocriptine (1 microg) and norepinephrine (1 microg) did not affect trifluoperazine-induced analgesia. Calcium (20 microg) attenuated the antinociceptive effect of trifluoperazine and inhibited the analgesic effect of calmidazolium. Finally, naloxone (2 mg/kg) decreased trifluoperazine-induced antinociception but did not have any effects on calmidazolium-induced analgesia. We concluded that calmodulin inhibition may be involved in the analgesia produced by trifluoperazine. With increasing doses of trifluoperazine, the algesic effect seems to overcome the analgesic effect. It is also suggested that the opioidergic system does not interact with calmodulin inhibition-induced analgesia even though this system has a possible role in trifluoperazine-induced analgesia.
低剂量鞘内三氟拉嗪诱导的镇痛中钙调素抑制的参与。
我们研究了三氟拉嗪的哪些已知特性,包括钙调素抑制,与它的镇痛作用有关。此外,我们试图发现阿片能系统与钙调素抑制诱导的镇痛之间可能的相互作用。鞘内注射三氟拉嗪(1、10、100 μ g)在福尔马林试验中表现出双相效应;即,相对低剂量(1,10微克)的镇痛和高剂量(100微克)的痛觉过敏。鞘内注射舒必利(1、10、100 μ g)、阿托品(0.1、1、10 μ g)、酚妥拉明(0.1、1、10 μ g)、溴苯那敏(0.1、1、10 μ g)均无镇痛作用。同时,鞘内注射卡咪达唑(10、50、250 μ g)诱导剂量依赖性镇痛。组胺(1 μ g)、毒豆碱(1 μ g)、溴隐亭(1 μ g)和去甲肾上腺素(1 μ g)对三氟拉嗪诱导的镇痛无影响。钙(20 μ g)减弱三氟拉嗪的抗疼痛作用,抑制卡咪唑的镇痛作用。最后,纳洛酮(2mg /kg)降低了三氟拉嗪诱导的抗痛觉,但对卡咪唑诱导的镇痛没有任何影响。我们认为钙调蛋白抑制可能参与了三氟拉嗪的镇痛作用。随着三氟拉嗪剂量的增加,镇痛作用似乎超过了镇痛作用。这也提示阿片能系统不与钙调素抑制诱导的镇痛相互作用,尽管该系统可能在三氟拉嗪诱导的镇痛中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信