Profile of the cardiac repolarization in cervical spinal cord injury subjects performing physical exercise

R. Magalhães, Edgar William Martins, A. Maior, M. Marocolo
{"title":"Profile of the cardiac repolarization in cervical spinal cord injury subjects performing physical exercise","authors":"R. Magalhães, Edgar William Martins, A. Maior, M. Marocolo","doi":"10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V39I2.33468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to compare rest QT interval and QTcorrected intervals of electrocardiogram in trained men with and without cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) and investigate cardiac electrocardiogram parameters in trained men with CSCI submitted to maximal effort test. Thirty men were separated into three groups: Control without CSCI (CON, 25.3 ± 4.1 yrs, strength training: 3 days week -1 ; aerobic training 1day week -1 ; n = 10), high volume exercise (30.5 ± 4.3 yrs, 3 day week -1 rugby specific exercises, 60min. day -1 ; n = 12) and moderate volume of exercise (33.7 ± 5.9 yrs, 2 days week -1 specific rugby exercises, 60 min. day -1 ; n = 8) with incomplete CSCI (C5-C7 cervical vertrebae) more than 12 months. Electrocardiogram was recorded in rest, during and after effort test. QT interval was significantly reduced (p = 0.001) in the high volume exercise group compared to control. Corrected QT interval showed no difference between moderate vs. high volume exercise group (p > 0.05). No changes were observed in QT, corrected QT, PR and QRS intervals of electrocardiogram between rest and post effort (p > 0.05). Thus, effort test does not change electrocardiogram parameters in CSCI subjects. High volume of week exercise promotes abnormalities in cardiac repolarization compared to a moderate training program.","PeriodicalId":7185,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Health Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"141-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V39I2.33468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare rest QT interval and QTcorrected intervals of electrocardiogram in trained men with and without cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) and investigate cardiac electrocardiogram parameters in trained men with CSCI submitted to maximal effort test. Thirty men were separated into three groups: Control without CSCI (CON, 25.3 ± 4.1 yrs, strength training: 3 days week -1 ; aerobic training 1day week -1 ; n = 10), high volume exercise (30.5 ± 4.3 yrs, 3 day week -1 rugby specific exercises, 60min. day -1 ; n = 12) and moderate volume of exercise (33.7 ± 5.9 yrs, 2 days week -1 specific rugby exercises, 60 min. day -1 ; n = 8) with incomplete CSCI (C5-C7 cervical vertrebae) more than 12 months. Electrocardiogram was recorded in rest, during and after effort test. QT interval was significantly reduced (p = 0.001) in the high volume exercise group compared to control. Corrected QT interval showed no difference between moderate vs. high volume exercise group (p > 0.05). No changes were observed in QT, corrected QT, PR and QRS intervals of electrocardiogram between rest and post effort (p > 0.05). Thus, effort test does not change electrocardiogram parameters in CSCI subjects. High volume of week exercise promotes abnormalities in cardiac repolarization compared to a moderate training program.
运动后颈脊髓损伤患者心脏复极的变化
本研究的目的是比较有和无颈脊髓损伤(CSCI)的训练男性的静息QT间期和QTcorrected心电图间期,并研究接受最大努力试验的CSCI训练男性的心电图参数。30名男性分为三组:无CSCI的对照组(CON, 25.3±4.1年,力量训练:每周3天-1;有氧训练每周1天-1;N = 10),大运动量运动(30.5±4.3年,每周3天-1橄榄球专项运动,60min。第1天;N = 12)和中等运动量(33.7±5.9年,每周2天-1特定橄榄球运动,每天60分钟-1;n = 8)不完全性CSCI (C5-C7颈椎)超过12个月。分别记录静息、用力试验时和用力试验后的心电图。与对照组相比,大运动量运动组QT间期显著缩短(p = 0.001)。校正后QT间期在中度运动组与高量运动组间无差异(p > 0.05)。两组心电图QT间期、校正QT间期、PR间期、QRS间期在休息与努力后无明显变化(p > 0.05)。因此,用力试验并没有改变CSCI受试者的心电图参数。与适度的训练计划相比,每周高强度的运动可促进心脏复极异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信