Pause and Rewind: Memories of Age-Inappropriate Film Viewings in the 1980s

Q4 Arts and Humanities
P. Turner
{"title":"Pause and Rewind: Memories of Age-Inappropriate Film Viewings in the 1980s","authors":"P. Turner","doi":"10.14746/i.2022.41.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThis article explores some of the findings from a work-in-progress project that I began working on in 2020 to investigate the retrospective memories of 1980s British audiences surrounding viewing films classified either 15 or 18 by the BBFC, while the participants were underage. I question the so-called victims of censorship that have matured into their 40s and are no longer at the mercy of parents or the classifications of the BBFC in order to investigate the retrospective memories of these adults who were once participating in forbidden viewings as children in the 1980s. This article explores Annette Kuhn’s idea that for audiences, the movie fades from memory to make way for more movies, but it is the life experiences that stay with the viewer. By focusing on underage viewers and films that had been deemed unsuitable for their age, I hope to review Kuhn’s claim, by resituating the film itself as the prominent memory – a memory not replaced by many decades of movie watching since. This article outlines the methodology for the project, before turning to a discussion of participants’ memories of interrupted film viewings. In exploring the dichotomy between memories of viewing conditions and memories of the film themselves, this article then considers memories of the horror genre (and terrifying scenes in other genres), and also the issues of watching sex in films, and the impact of parental restrictions, or watching while with parents. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":37086,"journal":{"name":"Images (Poland)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Images (Poland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/i.2022.41.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores some of the findings from a work-in-progress project that I began working on in 2020 to investigate the retrospective memories of 1980s British audiences surrounding viewing films classified either 15 or 18 by the BBFC, while the participants were underage. I question the so-called victims of censorship that have matured into their 40s and are no longer at the mercy of parents or the classifications of the BBFC in order to investigate the retrospective memories of these adults who were once participating in forbidden viewings as children in the 1980s. This article explores Annette Kuhn’s idea that for audiences, the movie fades from memory to make way for more movies, but it is the life experiences that stay with the viewer. By focusing on underage viewers and films that had been deemed unsuitable for their age, I hope to review Kuhn’s claim, by resituating the film itself as the prominent memory – a memory not replaced by many decades of movie watching since. This article outlines the methodology for the project, before turning to a discussion of participants’ memories of interrupted film viewings. In exploring the dichotomy between memories of viewing conditions and memories of the film themselves, this article then considers memories of the horror genre (and terrifying scenes in other genres), and also the issues of watching sex in films, and the impact of parental restrictions, or watching while with parents.
暂停和倒带:20世纪80年代不适合年龄的电影观看的记忆
本文探讨了我在2020年开始的一个正在进行的项目的一些发现,该项目旨在调查20世纪80年代英国观众在观看被BBFC评为15或18级的电影时的回顾性记忆,而参与者都是未成年人。我质疑所谓的审查受害者,他们已经成熟到40多岁,不再受父母或BBFC分级的摆布,为了调查这些曾经在20世纪80年代作为儿童参与被禁止观看的成年人的回顾性记忆。本文探讨了安妮特·库恩的观点,即对于观众来说,电影从记忆中消失,为更多的电影让路,但生活经历却与观众相伴。通过关注未成年观众和被认为不适合他们年龄的电影,我希望通过还原电影本身作为突出记忆的方式来回顾库恩的主张——一种几十年来一直没有被电影观看所取代的记忆。这篇文章概述了这个项目的方法,然后开始讨论参与者观看电影时被打断的记忆。在探索观看条件的记忆和电影本身的记忆之间的二分法时,本文接着考虑了恐怖类型的记忆(以及其他类型的恐怖场景),以及在电影中观看性的问题,以及父母限制的影响,或与父母一起观看的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Images (Poland)
Images (Poland) Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信