Pre-Understanding—A Threat to Validity in Qualitative Caring Science Research?

Lina Palmér, M. Nyström, Margaretha Ekeberg, Elisabeth Lindberg, K. Karlsson
{"title":"Pre-Understanding—A Threat to Validity in Qualitative Caring Science Research?","authors":"Lina Palmér, M. Nyström, Margaretha Ekeberg, Elisabeth Lindberg, K. Karlsson","doi":"10.20467/IJHC-2021-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to reflections on how to prevent pre-understanding from influencing the research process and jeopardizing the validity of a study. Influences from preunderstanding are exemplified from empirical lifeworld-led caring science research. Finally, there is a discussion of preunderstanding as a natural attitude and therefore also an important part of the lifeworld. It is concluded that validity requires a self-critical approach. It is suggested that a descriptive analysis, where the findings are fairly close to the data, involves a less problematic approach than research, which requires special attention to pre-understanding in connection with different levels of interpretation.","PeriodicalId":92527,"journal":{"name":"International journal for human caring","volume":"12 1","pages":"254 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for human caring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20467/IJHC-2021-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article is devoted to reflections on how to prevent pre-understanding from influencing the research process and jeopardizing the validity of a study. Influences from preunderstanding are exemplified from empirical lifeworld-led caring science research. Finally, there is a discussion of preunderstanding as a natural attitude and therefore also an important part of the lifeworld. It is concluded that validity requires a self-critical approach. It is suggested that a descriptive analysis, where the findings are fairly close to the data, involves a less problematic approach than research, which requires special attention to pre-understanding in connection with different levels of interpretation.
预理解——对质性关怀科学研究有效性的威胁?
本文致力于思考如何防止预理解影响研究过程和危害研究的有效性。以实证生活世界为主导的关爱科学研究例证了预理解的影响。最后,讨论了预理解是一种自然的态度,因此也是生活世界的重要组成部分。结论是,有效性需要一种自我批判的方法。有人建议,描述性分析的结果与数据相当接近,涉及的问题比研究少,因为研究需要特别注意与不同层次的解释有关的预理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信