Product performance - a review of construction product conformity assessment

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL

Australian Journal of Structural Engineering Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/13287982.2021.1909814

E. Gad, L. Pham, Jessey Lee, A. Amirsardari

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a need to improve the Australian conformance practice for construction products. This paper presents an overview of the current operating environment of Australia and discusses the different ways in which a product may not be fit for its intended use. Issues discussed in this paper include methods for identifying problematic products, multi-level conformity assessment system and how to make the Australian system perform better. Various institutions have made independent proposals to improve different aspects of the system. These efforts will be much more effective if coordinated into a national system.

查看原文本刊更多论文

产品性能——建筑产品合格评定的评审

有必要改进澳大利亚建筑产品的一致性实践。本文概述了澳大利亚目前的经营环境，并讨论了产品可能不适合其预期用途的不同方式。本文讨论的问题包括识别问题产品的方法，多层次合格评定体系以及如何使澳大利亚的体系更好地发挥作用。各机构提出了各自的建议，以改善该制度的不同方面。如果将这些努力协调成一个国家系统，将会有效得多。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Australian Journal of Structural Engineering ENGINEERING, CIVIL-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.