Biochemical Symmetrization/ Desymmetrization of Organic Compounds: Dendrimeric Relationship with Molecular Formulas

D. Iga, D. Popescu, V. Niculescu
{"title":"Biochemical Symmetrization/ Desymmetrization of Organic Compounds: Dendrimeric Relationship with Molecular Formulas","authors":"D. Iga, D. Popescu, V. Niculescu","doi":"10.9734/ajocs/2023/v13i2238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A criterion for systematization of organic compounds is described. Organic compounds (estimated to 16-20 millions) are of three types: (A) symmetric (especially meso and C2 symmetric), (B) possible symmetry generators, i.e. compounds possessing a real or imaginary, but plausible, symmetric correspondent: irrechi (from irregular distribution of chiral carbons) and constitutional), and (C) archaic (or primitive) that are neither symmetric nor possible symmetry generators. Symmetric compounds are a minority in organic chemistry. The three groups are (bio) chemically interchangeable. In preceding papers we have demonstrated that almost all natural micromolecular combinations are either symmetric or possible symmetry generators; archaic (primitive) type is also represented in natural chemistry. On the other hand, it should be stressed that symmetric compounds, both meso and C2 symmetrical (C2 symm.) have been found almost exclusively in plants and microorganisms, and they are usually produced from constitutional (constit.) precursors. A series of symmetrization/desymmetrization reactions are presented, and the proof is evidenced that they can establish a new and coherent concept in biochemistry and organic chemistry. Symmetrization reactions can be followed according to chemical type involved: oxidation, cyclization, esterification, glycosylation, methylation, etc. This approach is valid to all major classes of compounds. A dendrimeric relationship is presented within molecular formulae.","PeriodicalId":8505,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Chemical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Chemical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajocs/2023/v13i2238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A criterion for systematization of organic compounds is described. Organic compounds (estimated to 16-20 millions) are of three types: (A) symmetric (especially meso and C2 symmetric), (B) possible symmetry generators, i.e. compounds possessing a real or imaginary, but plausible, symmetric correspondent: irrechi (from irregular distribution of chiral carbons) and constitutional), and (C) archaic (or primitive) that are neither symmetric nor possible symmetry generators. Symmetric compounds are a minority in organic chemistry. The three groups are (bio) chemically interchangeable. In preceding papers we have demonstrated that almost all natural micromolecular combinations are either symmetric or possible symmetry generators; archaic (primitive) type is also represented in natural chemistry. On the other hand, it should be stressed that symmetric compounds, both meso and C2 symmetrical (C2 symm.) have been found almost exclusively in plants and microorganisms, and they are usually produced from constitutional (constit.) precursors. A series of symmetrization/desymmetrization reactions are presented, and the proof is evidenced that they can establish a new and coherent concept in biochemistry and organic chemistry. Symmetrization reactions can be followed according to chemical type involved: oxidation, cyclization, esterification, glycosylation, methylation, etc. This approach is valid to all major classes of compounds. A dendrimeric relationship is presented within molecular formulae.
有机化合物的生化对称/去对称:与分子式的枝聚体关系
描述了有机化合物的系统化标准。有机化合物(估计有16- 2000万)有三种类型:(A)对称的(特别是中位和C2对称的),(B)可能的对称发生器,即具有真实或想象的,但似乎是对称的对应物的化合物:不对称(来自手性碳的不规则分布)和结构),以及(C)既不对称也不可能对称发生器的古老(或原始)化合物。对称化合物在有机化学中是少数。这三种基团在(生物)化学上是可以互换的。在前面的论文中,我们已经证明了几乎所有的自然微分子组合要么是对称的,要么是可能的对称发生器;古代(原始)类型在自然化学中也有表现。另一方面,应该强调的是,对称化合物,无论是中位化合物还是C2对称化合物(C2对称),几乎只存在于植物和微生物中,它们通常是由构成前体产生的。提出了一系列的对称/不对称反应,并证明了它们可以在生物化学和有机化学中建立一个新的、连贯的概念。根据所涉及的化学类型,可以进行对称反应:氧化、环化、酯化、糖基化、甲基化等。这种方法对所有主要种类的化合物都有效。在分子式中存在树突结构关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信