Multi-criteria Assessment of Inter-company Comparison using WASPAS Method

{"title":"Multi-criteria Assessment of Inter-company Comparison using WASPAS Method","authors":"","doi":"10.46632/rmc/2/4/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adequate comparative performance of competing firms for quantitative evaluation and ranking several financial ratios must be considered simultaneously. This article is inter-institutional Examines the comparative process, A multi-criteria analysis model creates; The WASPAS approach identifies \"For assessment purposes\" Relevance of financial ratios in every financial ratio Inter-organizational Performance differences can be addressed. Through the interdependence of this assessment result is not conclusive ensures that Ratios, objective weights are used; consequently, the comparative process Conducted on a generally accepted basis and does not depend on the subjective preferences of various stakeholders. Inter-organizational In the comparative problem approach, Funding rates used the results reflect the information result shows that Comparison of objective weighting methods to other methods compares favorably with the WASPAS approach. Compare five firms (A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5) in the textile industry. A case study took this alternative approach and evaluated profitability, productivity, market position and debt ratio. A1 in 1st rank, A4 in 2nd rank, A5 in 3rd rank, A2 is at 4th rank and A3 is at 5th rank.","PeriodicalId":76806,"journal":{"name":"Vital and health statistics. Ser. 4, Documents and committee reports","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vital and health statistics. Ser. 4, Documents and committee reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46632/rmc/2/4/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adequate comparative performance of competing firms for quantitative evaluation and ranking several financial ratios must be considered simultaneously. This article is inter-institutional Examines the comparative process, A multi-criteria analysis model creates; The WASPAS approach identifies "For assessment purposes" Relevance of financial ratios in every financial ratio Inter-organizational Performance differences can be addressed. Through the interdependence of this assessment result is not conclusive ensures that Ratios, objective weights are used; consequently, the comparative process Conducted on a generally accepted basis and does not depend on the subjective preferences of various stakeholders. Inter-organizational In the comparative problem approach, Funding rates used the results reflect the information result shows that Comparison of objective weighting methods to other methods compares favorably with the WASPAS approach. Compare five firms (A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5) in the textile industry. A case study took this alternative approach and evaluated profitability, productivity, market position and debt ratio. A1 in 1st rank, A4 in 2nd rank, A5 in 3rd rank, A2 is at 4th rank and A3 is at 5th rank.
使用WASPAS方法进行公司间比较的多标准评估
为了定量评价和对几个财务比率进行排名,必须同时考虑竞争公司的适当比较业绩。本文是跨机构检验比较过程,一个多标准分析模型的创建;WASPAS方法确定了“出于评估目的”的财务比率在每个财务比率中的相关性,可以解决组织间绩效差异。通过这种相互依赖的评估结果不具有结论性,确保比率、权重均采用客观;因此,比较过程在普遍接受的基础上进行,而不依赖于各种利益相关者的主观偏好。在组织间比较问题方法中,利用结果反映的信息表明,客观加权方法与其他方法的比较优于WASPAS方法。比较纺织行业的五家公司(A1, A2, A3, A4和A5)。一个案例研究采用了这种替代方法,并评估了盈利能力、生产率、市场地位和负债率。A1是第一名,A4是第二名,A5是第三名,A2是第四名,A3是第五名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信