'Shona (derivational) Morphology: An Observation in Search of a Theory'

Zambezia Pub Date : 2004-02-17 DOI:10.4314/ZJH.V29I2.6728
K. Mkanganwi
{"title":"'Shona (derivational) Morphology: An Observation in Search of a Theory'","authors":"K. Mkanganwi","doi":"10.4314/ZJH.V29I2.6728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article concerns a traditional analysis of Shona morphology, which is based on a (positional) classification of affix morphemes into prefixes and suffixes. It posits the hypothesis that the distinction supports the other traditional (but more controversial) distinction between inflectional and derivational affixes, a distinction which is seen by many scholars in the literature as not being a sharp one. What, however, seems to be the case for Shona, and possibly for Bantu as well, is that the distinction is in fact quite sharp, and is based on the simple positional distinction between prefix and suffix. All Shona affixes fall into three classes, namely inflectional, derivational and clitical. The data seems to support the hypothesis. This study on morphology proceeds on the basis of the following key assumptions. The morpheme as the basic notion of morphology is uncontroversial, theoretically speaking. Bloomfield's theoretical construct has remained basically the same over the years, and Nida's 1949 definition of morphology as 'the study of morphemes and their arrangements in forming words' is widely accepted in Linguistics. The other key assumptions are that the classification of morphemes into roofs and affixes, the positional classification of affixes, in relation to root morphemes, into prefixes and suffixes and the fact that morphemes are either free or bound are no longer controversial issues. Lastly, this article also proceeds on the assumption that root morphemes have either a primary or secondary (i.e. derived) lexical category membership. These assumptions mean that the following general observations about Shon.i can safely be made. Shona has roots and affixes, prefixes and suffixes, free morphemes and bound morphemes. The vast majority of Shona morphemes are bound, in the sense that each must occur with at least one other morpheme. Free morphemes, like ideophones, necessarily constitute monomorphemic 'words'. All Shona affixes are bound morphemes. All free morphemes in Shona are roots, but most Shona root morphemes are also bound. A Shona 'word' has the following typical morphological structure (root morphemes in bold):","PeriodicalId":83564,"journal":{"name":"Zambezia","volume":"201 1","pages":"174-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zambezia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZJH.V29I2.6728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This article concerns a traditional analysis of Shona morphology, which is based on a (positional) classification of affix morphemes into prefixes and suffixes. It posits the hypothesis that the distinction supports the other traditional (but more controversial) distinction between inflectional and derivational affixes, a distinction which is seen by many scholars in the literature as not being a sharp one. What, however, seems to be the case for Shona, and possibly for Bantu as well, is that the distinction is in fact quite sharp, and is based on the simple positional distinction between prefix and suffix. All Shona affixes fall into three classes, namely inflectional, derivational and clitical. The data seems to support the hypothesis. This study on morphology proceeds on the basis of the following key assumptions. The morpheme as the basic notion of morphology is uncontroversial, theoretically speaking. Bloomfield's theoretical construct has remained basically the same over the years, and Nida's 1949 definition of morphology as 'the study of morphemes and their arrangements in forming words' is widely accepted in Linguistics. The other key assumptions are that the classification of morphemes into roofs and affixes, the positional classification of affixes, in relation to root morphemes, into prefixes and suffixes and the fact that morphemes are either free or bound are no longer controversial issues. Lastly, this article also proceeds on the assumption that root morphemes have either a primary or secondary (i.e. derived) lexical category membership. These assumptions mean that the following general observations about Shon.i can safely be made. Shona has roots and affixes, prefixes and suffixes, free morphemes and bound morphemes. The vast majority of Shona morphemes are bound, in the sense that each must occur with at least one other morpheme. Free morphemes, like ideophones, necessarily constitute monomorphemic 'words'. All Shona affixes are bound morphemes. All free morphemes in Shona are roots, but most Shona root morphemes are also bound. A Shona 'word' has the following typical morphological structure (root morphemes in bold):
衍生形态学:寻找理论的观察
本文关注的是一种传统的汉语词法分析,它是基于词缀词素的前缀和后缀(位置)分类。它假设这种区别支持另一种传统的(但更有争议的)屈折词缀和衍生词缀之间的区别,这种区别被许多文献中的学者视为不是一个尖锐的区别。然而,对于修纳语,可能对班图语也是如此,这种区别实际上是非常明显的,它是基于前缀和后缀之间简单的位置区别。所有的粤语词缀都可以分为三类,即屈折词缀、派生词缀和限定词缀。数据似乎支持这一假设。形态学的研究是基于以下几个关键假设进行的。语素作为词法的基本概念在理论上是没有争议的。多年来,布卢姆菲尔德的理论结构基本保持不变,奈达在1949年将形态学定义为“研究语素及其构成单词的排列”,这在语言学中被广泛接受。其他关键的假设是语素分为词根和词缀,词缀的位置分类,相对于词根语素,分为前缀和后缀,语素是自由的或束缚的这一事实不再是有争议的问题。最后,本文还假设词根语素具有主要或次要(即派生)词汇范畴隶属关系。这些假设意味着以下关于肖恩的一般性观察。我可以安全地被制造出来。汉语有词根和词缀、前缀和后缀、自由语素和束缚语素。绝大多数的朔那语素是结合在一起的,也就是说,每个语素必须与至少一个其他语素一起出现。自由语素,就像表意音素一样,必然构成单形态的“词”。所有的汉语词缀都是限定语素。舒纳语中的自由语素都是词根,但大多数舒纳语的词根也有束缚。修纳语“词”具有以下典型的形态结构(词根粗体):
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信