Auto-Segmentation on Liver with U-Net and Pixel De-Convolutional Network

Huan-Chung Yao, Jenghwa Chang
{"title":"Auto-Segmentation on Liver with U-Net and Pixel De-Convolutional Network","authors":"Huan-Chung Yao, Jenghwa Chang","doi":"10.4236/IJMPCERO.2021.102008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To improve the liver \nauto-segmentation performance of three-dimensional (3D) U-net by replacing \nthe conventional up-sampling convolution layers with the Pixel De-convolutional \nNetwork (PDN) that considers spatial features. Methods: The U-net was \noriginally developed to segment neuronal structure with outstanding performance \nbut suffered serious artifacts from indirectly unrelated adjacent pixels in its \nup-sampling layers. The hypothesis of this study was that the segmentation \nquality of the liver could be \nimproved with PDN in which the up-sampling layer was replaced by a pixel \nde-convolution layer (PDL). Seventy-eight plans of abdominal cancer patients were \nanonymized and exported. Sixty-two were chosen for training two networks: 1) 3D \nU-Net, and 2) 3D PDN, by minimizing the Dice loss function. The other sixteen \nplans were used to test the performance. The similarity Dice and Average \nHausdorff Distance (AHD) were calculated and compared between these two \nnetworks. Results: The computation time for 62 training cases and 200 \ntraining epochs was about 30 minutes for both networks. The segmentation \nperformance was evaluated using the remaining 16 cases. For the Dice score, the \nmean ± standard deviation were 0.857 ± 0.011 and 0.858 ± 0.015 for the PDN and \nU-Net, respectively. For the AHD, the mean ± standard deviation were 1.575 ± \n0.373 and 1.675 ± 0.769, respectively, corresponding to an improvement of 6.0% \nand 51.5% of mean and standard deviation for the PDN. Conclusion: The \nPDN has outperformed the U-Net on liver auto-segmentation. The predicted \ncontours of PDN are more conformal and smoother when compared with the U-Net.","PeriodicalId":14028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/IJMPCERO.2021.102008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To improve the liver auto-segmentation performance of three-dimensional (3D) U-net by replacing the conventional up-sampling convolution layers with the Pixel De-convolutional Network (PDN) that considers spatial features. Methods: The U-net was originally developed to segment neuronal structure with outstanding performance but suffered serious artifacts from indirectly unrelated adjacent pixels in its up-sampling layers. The hypothesis of this study was that the segmentation quality of the liver could be improved with PDN in which the up-sampling layer was replaced by a pixel de-convolution layer (PDL). Seventy-eight plans of abdominal cancer patients were anonymized and exported. Sixty-two were chosen for training two networks: 1) 3D U-Net, and 2) 3D PDN, by minimizing the Dice loss function. The other sixteen plans were used to test the performance. The similarity Dice and Average Hausdorff Distance (AHD) were calculated and compared between these two networks. Results: The computation time for 62 training cases and 200 training epochs was about 30 minutes for both networks. The segmentation performance was evaluated using the remaining 16 cases. For the Dice score, the mean ± standard deviation were 0.857 ± 0.011 and 0.858 ± 0.015 for the PDN and U-Net, respectively. For the AHD, the mean ± standard deviation were 1.575 ± 0.373 and 1.675 ± 0.769, respectively, corresponding to an improvement of 6.0% and 51.5% of mean and standard deviation for the PDN. Conclusion: The PDN has outperformed the U-Net on liver auto-segmentation. The predicted contours of PDN are more conformal and smoother when compared with the U-Net.
基于U-Net和像素去卷积网络的肝脏自动分割
目的:用考虑空间特征的像素去卷积网络(Pixel De-convolutional Network, PDN)取代传统的上采样卷积层,提高三维U-net的肝脏自动分割性能。方法:U-net最初用于分割神经元结构,具有出色的性能,但其上采样层中间接不相关的相邻像素存在严重的伪影。本研究的假设是PDN可以提高肝脏的分割质量,其中上采样层被像素去卷积层(PDL)取代。78例腹部肿瘤患者的方案匿名输出。通过最小化Dice损失函数,选择62个网络用于训练两个网络:1)3D U-Net和2)3D PDN。另外16个计划用于测试性能。计算并比较了两种网络的相似度Dice和平均Hausdorff距离(AHD)。结果:两种网络的62个训练案例和200个训练epoch的计算时间均在30分钟左右。使用剩余的16个案例对分割性能进行评估。PDN和U-Net的Dice评分均值±标准差分别为0.857±0.011和0.858±0.015。AHD的平均值±标准差分别为1.575±0.373和1.675±0.769,分别比PDN的平均值和标准差提高了6.0%和51.5%。结论:PDN在肝脏自动分割方面优于U-Net。与U-Net相比,PDN的预测轮廓更加保形和平滑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信