“Neoprivatisation” in Public Schools in Nepal

Shurendra Ghimire, K. Koirala
{"title":"“Neoprivatisation” in Public Schools in Nepal","authors":"Shurendra Ghimire, K. Koirala","doi":"10.3126/jer.v9i1.28824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces the term “neoprivatisation” in the literature of economics of education.  It exposes the consequence of privatisation in education to public school by taking a community as a case and studying in a mixed-method paradigm.  The study uncovers that public schools suffer from lesser preference by parents, and underuse or misuse of public expenditure, so that, like private schools, have added the facilities of English medium, extra-class, preparing students for test by charging fees, as well as advertising to attract more students. As a result, the narrow focus to achievement score rather than developing qualities in students as expected by curriculum has threatened the presumption of ‘quality education’; and the commodification and commercialisation of education along with diminishing professional accountability of teacher victimise students with the undue burden of irrational extra-classes and fees.  Therefore, the added facilities rouse for discriminating students in access to education and larceny of ‘right to free education’.  These undesirable phenomena are the consequences of privatisation in education, which has been thus conceptualized as “neoprivatisation”.","PeriodicalId":32077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Research","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v9i1.28824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article introduces the term “neoprivatisation” in the literature of economics of education.  It exposes the consequence of privatisation in education to public school by taking a community as a case and studying in a mixed-method paradigm.  The study uncovers that public schools suffer from lesser preference by parents, and underuse or misuse of public expenditure, so that, like private schools, have added the facilities of English medium, extra-class, preparing students for test by charging fees, as well as advertising to attract more students. As a result, the narrow focus to achievement score rather than developing qualities in students as expected by curriculum has threatened the presumption of ‘quality education’; and the commodification and commercialisation of education along with diminishing professional accountability of teacher victimise students with the undue burden of irrational extra-classes and fees.  Therefore, the added facilities rouse for discriminating students in access to education and larceny of ‘right to free education’.  These undesirable phenomena are the consequences of privatisation in education, which has been thus conceptualized as “neoprivatisation”.
尼泊尔公立学校的“新私有化”
本文介绍了教育经济学文献中的“新私有化”一词。本文以一个社区为例,采用混合方法的研究范式,向公立学校揭示了教育私有化的后果。该研究发现,公立学校受到家长不太喜欢,公共支出使用不足或滥用的影响,因此像私立学校一样,增加了英语教学、课外辅导、收费备考设施,以及广告来吸引更多的学生。因此,狭隘地关注成绩,而不是课程所期望的培养学生的素质,已经威胁到“素质教育”的假设;教育的商品化和商业化,以及教师职业责任的削弱,使学生承受了不合理的课外课程和费用带来的不应有的负担。因此,增加的设施引发了学生在接受教育方面的歧视和“免费教育权”的盗窃。这些不良现象是教育私有化的后果,因此被概念化为“新私有化”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信