The effect of temperature on linear dimensional stability of elastomers

Geerts Greta Maria, Muller Susanne Sanette
{"title":"The effect of temperature on linear dimensional stability of elastomers","authors":"Geerts Greta Maria, Muller Susanne Sanette","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.129005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of temperature on dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials. Materials and Methods: Polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impressions of an International Organization for Standardization-specified test-block were photographed at two temperatures and 3 time intervals. This resulted in 12 groups (n = 10). Images were digitally calibrated and measured. Mean percentage dimensional change (%DC) was analyzed using the Variance Estimation and Precision module of Statistica 10 (Statsoft®, Southern Africa) (95% confidence), with Fisher least significant difference correction for multiple pairwise comparisons. Results: For silicone, dimensional accuracy was highest when stored at 21°C for 14 days (%DC = 0.006). This was significantly better than all other silicone groups (P < 0.05). Dimensional accuracy was worst when stored at 21°C for 8 h (%DC = 0.237) and after cooling-off from 66°C (%DC = 0.300), with no difference between latter groups (P = 0.187). For polyether, dimensional accuracy was highest when stored at 21°C for 14 days (%DC = −0.272). This was significantly better than all other polyether groups (P < 0.05). Dimensional accuracy was worst when stored at 21°C for 8 h (%DC = 0.364) and after cooling-off from 66°C (%DC = 0.306), with no difference between latter groups (P = 0.199). Comparing polyether with silicone, %DC did not differ between the two materials when kept at 21°C for 14 days and when cooled-off after heat exposure for 8 h. At all other instances, the %DC between the two materials differed, with silicone always closest to zero %DC. Conclusions: Exposing silicone and polyether to high temperature doesn′t lead to higher dimensional inaccuracy on the short-term compared to keeping them at 21°C. However, heat has an effect on shelf-life (14 days) of impressions, decreasing accuracy. This effect is worse for polyether.","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":"6 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.129005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of temperature on dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials. Materials and Methods: Polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impressions of an International Organization for Standardization-specified test-block were photographed at two temperatures and 3 time intervals. This resulted in 12 groups (n = 10). Images were digitally calibrated and measured. Mean percentage dimensional change (%DC) was analyzed using the Variance Estimation and Precision module of Statistica 10 (Statsoft®, Southern Africa) (95% confidence), with Fisher least significant difference correction for multiple pairwise comparisons. Results: For silicone, dimensional accuracy was highest when stored at 21°C for 14 days (%DC = 0.006). This was significantly better than all other silicone groups (P < 0.05). Dimensional accuracy was worst when stored at 21°C for 8 h (%DC = 0.237) and after cooling-off from 66°C (%DC = 0.300), with no difference between latter groups (P = 0.187). For polyether, dimensional accuracy was highest when stored at 21°C for 14 days (%DC = −0.272). This was significantly better than all other polyether groups (P < 0.05). Dimensional accuracy was worst when stored at 21°C for 8 h (%DC = 0.364) and after cooling-off from 66°C (%DC = 0.306), with no difference between latter groups (P = 0.199). Comparing polyether with silicone, %DC did not differ between the two materials when kept at 21°C for 14 days and when cooled-off after heat exposure for 8 h. At all other instances, the %DC between the two materials differed, with silicone always closest to zero %DC. Conclusions: Exposing silicone and polyether to high temperature doesn′t lead to higher dimensional inaccuracy on the short-term compared to keeping them at 21°C. However, heat has an effect on shelf-life (14 days) of impressions, decreasing accuracy. This effect is worse for polyether.
温度对弹性体线性尺寸稳定性的影响
目的:研究温度对弹性体印模材料尺寸稳定性的影响。材料和方法:在两种温度和3个时间间隔下拍摄国际标准化组织指定的测试块的聚醚和聚乙烯烃印模。结果有12组(n = 10)。图像经过数字校准和测量。使用Statistica 10 (Statsoft®,南部非洲)的方差估计和精度模块(95%置信度)分析平均百分比维度变化(%DC),对多个两两比较采用Fisher最小显著差异校正。结果:硅胶在21℃保存14 d时尺寸精度最高(%DC = 0.006)。显著优于其他硅胶组(P < 0.05)。尺寸精度在21°C保存8小时(%DC = 0.237)和66°C冷却后(%DC = 0.300)最差,后两组之间无差异(P = 0.187)。对于聚醚,在21°C保存14天时尺寸精度最高(%DC = - 0.272)。这明显优于其他聚醚组(P < 0.05)。尺寸精度在21°C保存8 h (%DC = 0.364)和66°C冷却后(%DC = 0.306)最差,后两组之间无差异(P = 0.199)。将聚醚和硅酮进行比较,两种材料在21°C下保存14天和在热暴露8小时后冷却时的%DC没有差异。在所有其他情况下,两种材料之间的%DC不同,硅酮总是接近零%DC。结论:硅胶和聚醚在高温下短期内的尺寸误差并不比在21℃下高。然而,热量会影响印模的保质期(14天),降低精度。聚醚的这种效果更糟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信