Influence of the Guided Inquiry Learning Model Assisted by a Two-stay Two Stray towards Chemistry Learning Outcomes of High School Students

Dahlia Sofiyatun, M. R. Jura, S. Sabang
{"title":"Influence of the Guided Inquiry Learning Model Assisted by a Two-stay Two Stray towards Chemistry Learning Outcomes of High School Students","authors":"Dahlia Sofiyatun, M. R. Jura, S. Sabang","doi":"10.22487/j24775185.2021.v10.i4.pp208-212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the influence of the guided inquiry learning model assisted by two stay two stray toward learning outcomes of students on chemistry at SMA 7 Palu. The type of study was Pre-experimental with a one-shot case study design. The sample was prepared using the purposive sampling technique with a sample consisting of Class XI Science 4 as the experimental class 1, and Class XI Science 2 as the experimental class 2. Both classes consisted of 28 students. The research instruments were the learning outcomes tests, student worksheets, and observation sheets that have been validated theoretically and empirically. Data of learning outcomes was analyzed using inferential statistical analysis with a prerequisite test: normality, homogeneity, and t-test hypothesis test (right side). The results showed that the average learning outcomes for experimental class 1 was 62.32, and for experimental class 2 was 50.29, with standard deviations of 12.58 and 12.05, respectively. Hypothesis test obtained tcount>ttable or 4.04 > 1.67, so H1 is accepted. The average learning outcomes of students in the experimental class 1 with guided inquiry learning model assisted by two stay two stray is higher than in the experimental class 2 with a guided inquiry learning model. Guided inquiry learning model assisted by two stay two stray influences learning outcomes of students at SMA 7 Palu.","PeriodicalId":17695,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akademika Kimia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akademika Kimia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2021.v10.i4.pp208-212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the influence of the guided inquiry learning model assisted by two stay two stray toward learning outcomes of students on chemistry at SMA 7 Palu. The type of study was Pre-experimental with a one-shot case study design. The sample was prepared using the purposive sampling technique with a sample consisting of Class XI Science 4 as the experimental class 1, and Class XI Science 2 as the experimental class 2. Both classes consisted of 28 students. The research instruments were the learning outcomes tests, student worksheets, and observation sheets that have been validated theoretically and empirically. Data of learning outcomes was analyzed using inferential statistical analysis with a prerequisite test: normality, homogeneity, and t-test hypothesis test (right side). The results showed that the average learning outcomes for experimental class 1 was 62.32, and for experimental class 2 was 50.29, with standard deviations of 12.58 and 12.05, respectively. Hypothesis test obtained tcount>ttable or 4.04 > 1.67, so H1 is accepted. The average learning outcomes of students in the experimental class 1 with guided inquiry learning model assisted by two stay two stray is higher than in the experimental class 2 with a guided inquiry learning model. Guided inquiry learning model assisted by two stay two stray influences learning outcomes of students at SMA 7 Palu.
双停留双偏辅助的引导式探究学习模式对高中生化学学习成果的影响
本研究旨在探讨两停留两偏离引导式探究学习模式对帕卢中学学生化学学习成果的影响。研究类型为预实验,采用一次性案例研究设计。两个班共有28名学生。研究工具是学习成果测试,学生工作表和观察表,已被理论和经验验证。学习结果数据采用推理统计分析,并采用前提检验:正态性、齐性和t检验假设检验(右侧)。结果显示,实验1班学生的平均学习成绩为62.32,实验2班学生的平均学习成绩为50.29,标准差分别为12.58和12.05。假设检验得到tcount> table或4.04 > 1.67,因此接受H1。实验1班学生的平均学习成绩高于实验2班学生的平均学习成绩。两留两散辅助的引导式探究学习模式对帕卢中学学生学习效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信