Lewis Robinson, Charles Parsons, Korinne Northwood, Dan Siskind, Peter McArdle
{"title":"Patient and Clinician Experience of Using Telehealth During the <b>'COVID-19</b> Pandemic in a Public Mental Health Service in Australia.","authors":"Lewis Robinson, Charles Parsons, Korinne Northwood, Dan Siskind, Peter McArdle","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic, mental health services adopted telehealth to facilitate ongoing assessment and treatment of patients with severe mental illness. We aimed to assess the telehealth experience of mental health patients and clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic to inform ongoing clinical telehealth service usage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two participant cohorts were recruited: Patients with severe mental illness at a community public mental health service; and clinicians working within this service. Participants from both cohorts were surveyed regarding their experience of using telehealth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 44 patients and 51 clinicians. Most participants reported having access to appropriate telehealth technology. Among patients, 80% reported having participated in any telephone consultations, while 39% reported having taken part in video-telehealth consultations with their psychiatrist. Similarly, 77% of clinicians reported having used video telehealth. Patients reported feeling more confident with video telehealth if they were younger, lived with friends, family or partner, or had access to the internet or a smartphone. Patients reported that telehealth consultations were more convenient and may reduce nonattendance. They reported having good rapport when using video telehealth. The majority of clinicians reported feeling positively about assessing risk and delivering therapy using video telehealth but not with telephone consultations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that video telehealth is a feasible way of delivering mental health care and appears to be acceptable to both patients and clinicians. However, clinicians raised concerns about their ability to assess risk and provide therapy using telephone consultations. Patients also reported that the convenience of telehealth may improve engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":89222,"journal":{"name":"Procedia, social and behavioral sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"sgad016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia, social and behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic, mental health services adopted telehealth to facilitate ongoing assessment and treatment of patients with severe mental illness. We aimed to assess the telehealth experience of mental health patients and clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic to inform ongoing clinical telehealth service usage.
Methods: Two participant cohorts were recruited: Patients with severe mental illness at a community public mental health service; and clinicians working within this service. Participants from both cohorts were surveyed regarding their experience of using telehealth.
Results: The survey was completed by 44 patients and 51 clinicians. Most participants reported having access to appropriate telehealth technology. Among patients, 80% reported having participated in any telephone consultations, while 39% reported having taken part in video-telehealth consultations with their psychiatrist. Similarly, 77% of clinicians reported having used video telehealth. Patients reported feeling more confident with video telehealth if they were younger, lived with friends, family or partner, or had access to the internet or a smartphone. Patients reported that telehealth consultations were more convenient and may reduce nonattendance. They reported having good rapport when using video telehealth. The majority of clinicians reported feeling positively about assessing risk and delivering therapy using video telehealth but not with telephone consultations.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that video telehealth is a feasible way of delivering mental health care and appears to be acceptable to both patients and clinicians. However, clinicians raised concerns about their ability to assess risk and provide therapy using telephone consultations. Patients also reported that the convenience of telehealth may improve engagement.