Use of Tense-Aspect Forms in Cordis Project Reports

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Jana Kuzmina
{"title":"Use of Tense-Aspect Forms in Cordis Project Reports","authors":"Jana Kuzmina","doi":"10.22364/BJELLC.09.2019.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For several recent decades the Council of Europe and various European authorities have been encouraging various European universities and other institutions to unite research activities resulting in the creation of partnerships with a conventialised genre network of calls for projects, guidelines for proposals and databases of project documentation. Along with Latvia acting in political, economic and social arenas of the European Union, it has also been actively involved in research consortia as coordinator and participant, therefore, setting new objectives for communicative competence development of scholars and project managers in order to reflect the discursive practices. In view of this, the present cross-sectional empirical investigation is intended to explore the written genre of Community Research and Development Informa tion Service (CORDIS) periodic (status) and closure (results in brief) pro ject reports as fundamental documents to account for research results in various eco no mi cally and socially significant spheres. The selected research metho do logy is a descriptive case study, involving genre and discourse analysis. The obtained results claim that reports have a rigid generic macro-structure. It explains the use of the selected tense-aspect forms to express the communi cative aim in both types of reports; however, periodic reports demonstrate higher variation due to the involvement of a different discourse community. The signi ficance of the study lies in the scarcity of previous research on this genre and wide application of research findings to support the discourse community of researchers.","PeriodicalId":55896,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.09.2019.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For several recent decades the Council of Europe and various European authorities have been encouraging various European universities and other institutions to unite research activities resulting in the creation of partnerships with a conventialised genre network of calls for projects, guidelines for proposals and databases of project documentation. Along with Latvia acting in political, economic and social arenas of the European Union, it has also been actively involved in research consortia as coordinator and participant, therefore, setting new objectives for communicative competence development of scholars and project managers in order to reflect the discursive practices. In view of this, the present cross-sectional empirical investigation is intended to explore the written genre of Community Research and Development Informa tion Service (CORDIS) periodic (status) and closure (results in brief) pro ject reports as fundamental documents to account for research results in various eco no mi cally and socially significant spheres. The selected research metho do logy is a descriptive case study, involving genre and discourse analysis. The obtained results claim that reports have a rigid generic macro-structure. It explains the use of the selected tense-aspect forms to express the communi cative aim in both types of reports; however, periodic reports demonstrate higher variation due to the involvement of a different discourse community. The signi ficance of the study lies in the scarcity of previous research on this genre and wide application of research findings to support the discourse community of researchers.
在Cordis项目报告中使用时态时态形式
近几十年来,欧洲委员会和各种欧洲当局一直在鼓励欧洲各大学和其他机构联合开展研究活动,从而建立了一个传统的项目征集网络、提案指南和项目文件数据库的伙伴关系。随着拉脱维亚在欧洲联盟的政治、经济和社会领域的行动,它也作为协调者和参与者积极参与研究联盟,因此,为学者和项目经理的交流能力发展设定了新的目标,以反映话语实践。鉴于此,本横断面实证调查旨在探索社区研究与发展信息服务(CORDIS)定期(状态)和结束(结果简述)项目报告的书面类型,作为解释各种经济和社会重要领域的研究成果的基本文件。本文选择的研究方法是描述性案例研究,包括类型分析和话语分析。所得结果表明,报告具有刚性的一般宏观结构。它解释了在这两种类型的报告中使用所选择的时态形式来表达交际目的;然而,由于不同话语群体的参与,定期报告表现出更高的差异。本研究的意义在于以往对这一类型的研究较少,而研究成果的广泛应用支持了研究者的话语共同体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信