Information Inequality in Online Education

Luis Armona, M. Rasouli
{"title":"Information Inequality in Online Education","authors":"Luis Armona, M. Rasouli","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3730109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we study platform solutions for improving customer engagement in online higher education by reducing informational inequality for historically under-represented groups in education such as females and workers seeking to improve their skill set. \nUsing novel search and enrollment data from the largest online education platform in Iran, we estimate a structural model of course search and enrollment for paid courses, allowing us to recover learner belief's about courses, as well as their true preference over the characteristic space of online courses. We use machine learning methods to recover the latent characteristic space of courses, identifying which courses are substitutes via a data-driven approach. \nWe document significant heterogeneity in how learners differing by gender and working status perceive course value, due to biased beliefs, relative to the true value. Counterfactual policy exercises suggest that the platform can increase revenue, improve consumer surplus, and reduce the gender gap in quantitative courses. Finally, we also present the problem faced by the platform from an information design perspective, and characterize the optimal signal the platform can send to learners with heterogenous priors to maximize an arbitrary objective function.","PeriodicalId":14586,"journal":{"name":"IO: Productivity","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Productivity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3730109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we study platform solutions for improving customer engagement in online higher education by reducing informational inequality for historically under-represented groups in education such as females and workers seeking to improve their skill set. Using novel search and enrollment data from the largest online education platform in Iran, we estimate a structural model of course search and enrollment for paid courses, allowing us to recover learner belief's about courses, as well as their true preference over the characteristic space of online courses. We use machine learning methods to recover the latent characteristic space of courses, identifying which courses are substitutes via a data-driven approach. We document significant heterogeneity in how learners differing by gender and working status perceive course value, due to biased beliefs, relative to the true value. Counterfactual policy exercises suggest that the platform can increase revenue, improve consumer surplus, and reduce the gender gap in quantitative courses. Finally, we also present the problem faced by the platform from an information design perspective, and characterize the optimal signal the platform can send to learners with heterogenous priors to maximize an arbitrary objective function.
网络教育中的信息不平等
在本文中,我们研究了通过减少历史上代表性不足的教育群体(如女性和寻求提高技能的工人)的信息不平等来提高在线高等教育客户参与度的平台解决方案。利用来自伊朗最大的在线教育平台的新颖搜索和入学数据,我们估计了付费课程的课程搜索和入学的结构模型,使我们能够恢复学习者对课程的信念,以及他们对在线课程特征空间的真实偏好。我们使用机器学习方法来恢复课程的潜在特征空间,通过数据驱动的方法识别哪些课程是替代品。我们记录了不同性别和工作状态的学习者如何感知课程价值的显著异质性,由于偏见的信念,相对于真实价值。反事实的政策实践表明,该平台可以增加收入,提高消费者剩余,并减少定量课程中的性别差距。最后,我们还从信息设计的角度提出了平台所面临的问题,并描述了平台可以向具有异构先验的学习者发送的最优信号,以最大化任意目标函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信