Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response, the Future of Cancer Research and a New Designated Journal

IF 0.7
A. Blumental-Perry
{"title":"Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response, the Future of Cancer Research and a New Designated Journal","authors":"A. Blumental-Perry","doi":"10.2478/ersc-2012-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR), the understanding of its mechanisms, and its contribution to the numerous vital functions of the cell are both the most avantgarde and highest priority in basic and clinical biomedical research fields. Like many other important fields in biology, ERSR started completely as basic research, with the most important discoveries made in yeast, immunoglobulin assembly and metabolic cellular studies [1,2]. Protein chaperones, such as Grp78 and Grp94, were indeed discovered in glucose starvation experiments between the mid-seventies and eighties by Pastan’s lab [3]. Gething and Sambrook understood the importance of chaperone up-regulation and discovered common elements in their promoters that govern chaperones’ transcriptional control. It was in 1992 when the term “Unfolded Protein Response” (UPR) was first used [4]. The yeast IRE1 trans-membrane kinase and ribonuclease was the first sensor of the accumulation of unfolded proteins in ER cloned in 1998 by two labs, Sambrook and Walter [5,6]. IRE1 is the most evolutionary conserved branch of UPR and the only one present in yeast. The rescue of IRE1 -/yeast cells by over-expression of Hac1p transcription factor revealed the unique mode of action of IREα ref., thus connecting the sensing of ERS and the massive transcriptional program initiated by UPR signaling. Beautifully surprising and somehow expected is the story of mammalian UPR sensors’ identification [7-11]. As compared to that of the yeast, the mammalian system shows much more complexity and redundancy due to contributions from at least 3 major pathways of UPR: IRE1α and IREα, PERK and ATF6. PERK added extra release to the stressed ER by translational attenuation of new protein synthesis. Before XBP1 was identified and connected to UPR, it was thought that ATF6 fulfilled Hac1 function in higher eukaryotes [12,13]. Slowly, the primary components of UPR have been unveiled; experiments implementing “classical” and artificial UPR inducers, such as Tunicamycin and Thapsigargin, have helped to delineate the core mechanisms of UPR induction as well as Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response, the Future of Cancer Research and a New Designated Journal. Editorial • DOI: 10.2478/ersc-2012-0001 • ERSC • 201 • 1-3","PeriodicalId":29730,"journal":{"name":"Cell Pathology","volume":"57 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ersc-2012-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR), the understanding of its mechanisms, and its contribution to the numerous vital functions of the cell are both the most avantgarde and highest priority in basic and clinical biomedical research fields. Like many other important fields in biology, ERSR started completely as basic research, with the most important discoveries made in yeast, immunoglobulin assembly and metabolic cellular studies [1,2]. Protein chaperones, such as Grp78 and Grp94, were indeed discovered in glucose starvation experiments between the mid-seventies and eighties by Pastan’s lab [3]. Gething and Sambrook understood the importance of chaperone up-regulation and discovered common elements in their promoters that govern chaperones’ transcriptional control. It was in 1992 when the term “Unfolded Protein Response” (UPR) was first used [4]. The yeast IRE1 trans-membrane kinase and ribonuclease was the first sensor of the accumulation of unfolded proteins in ER cloned in 1998 by two labs, Sambrook and Walter [5,6]. IRE1 is the most evolutionary conserved branch of UPR and the only one present in yeast. The rescue of IRE1 -/yeast cells by over-expression of Hac1p transcription factor revealed the unique mode of action of IREα ref., thus connecting the sensing of ERS and the massive transcriptional program initiated by UPR signaling. Beautifully surprising and somehow expected is the story of mammalian UPR sensors’ identification [7-11]. As compared to that of the yeast, the mammalian system shows much more complexity and redundancy due to contributions from at least 3 major pathways of UPR: IRE1α and IREα, PERK and ATF6. PERK added extra release to the stressed ER by translational attenuation of new protein synthesis. Before XBP1 was identified and connected to UPR, it was thought that ATF6 fulfilled Hac1 function in higher eukaryotes [12,13]. Slowly, the primary components of UPR have been unveiled; experiments implementing “classical” and artificial UPR inducers, such as Tunicamycin and Thapsigargin, have helped to delineate the core mechanisms of UPR induction as well as Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response, the Future of Cancer Research and a New Designated Journal. Editorial • DOI: 10.2478/ersc-2012-0001 • ERSC • 201 • 1-3
内质网应激反应,癌症研究的未来和一个新的指定期刊
内质网应激反应(ERSR)及其机制的理解及其对细胞许多重要功能的贡献是基础和临床生物医学研究领域中最前沿和最优先考虑的问题。与生物学中许多其他重要领域一样,ERSR完全是从基础研究开始的,其中最重要的发现是在酵母、免疫球蛋白组装和代谢细胞研究中发现的[1,2]。蛋白质伴侣,如Grp78和Grp94,确实是在70年代中期和80年代由Pastan的实验室在葡萄糖饥饿实验中发现的[3]。Gething和Sambrook理解了伴侣蛋白上调的重要性,并在它们的启动子中发现了控制伴侣蛋白转录控制的共同元素。“未折叠蛋白反应”(Unfolded Protein Response, UPR)一词首次被使用是在1992年[4]。酵母IRE1跨膜激酶和核糖核酸酶是1998年Sambrook和Walter两个实验室克隆的内质网中未折叠蛋白积累的第一个传感器[5,6]。IRE1是UPR中最保守的分支,也是酵母中唯一存在的分支。Hac1p转录因子过表达对IRE1 -/酵母细胞的拯救揭示了IRE1 α ref的独特作用模式,从而将ERS的感知与UPR信号启动的大规模转录程序联系起来。哺乳动物普遍定期审议传感器的识别过程令人惊喜不已,也在某种程度上出乎意料[7-11]。与酵母相比,哺乳动物系统显示出更大的复杂性和冗余性,因为至少有3个主要的UPR通路:IRE1α和IREα, PERK和ATF6。PERK通过对新蛋白合成的翻译衰减为应激内质网增加了额外的释放。在XBP1被发现并与UPR连接之前,人们认为ATF6在高等真核生物中实现了Hac1的功能[12,13]。普遍定期审议的主要组成部分已经慢慢公布;实施“经典”和人工UPR诱导剂的实验,如Tunicamycin和Thapsigargin,有助于描述UPR诱导的核心机制以及内质网应激反应,癌症研究的未来和一个新的指定期刊。编辑•DOI: 10.2478/ ERSC -2012-0001•ERSC•201•1-3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信