E. Zikos, C. Coens, J. Bean, D. Ediebah, A. Bottomley
{"title":"Measuring the Quality of Life of Patients with Cancer","authors":"E. Zikos, C. Coens, J. Bean, D. Ediebah, A. Bottomley","doi":"10.17925/EOH.2014.10.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© Touch MEdical MEdia 2013 Abstract What is quality of life? clinical trials have long been dominated by clinically based endpoints, but research has proved that health-related quality of life (hRQol) can only be captured accurately by patients themselves using patient reported outcomes (PRos). The united States Food and drug administration defines PRos as the measurement of any aspect of a patient’s health status that comes directly from the patient, that is, a measurement taken without interpretation of the patient’s responses by a physician or anyone else. The EoRTc QlQ-c30 is the most widely cancer specific hRQol questionnaire used for PRos in the world. developed in 1991 by the EoRTc Quality of life Group, it has been translated into more than 60 languages and has over 40 developed or under development cancer specific modules. one of the key challenges faced is pooling data and performing meta-analyses of the results of closed trials. The EoRTc Patient Reported outcomes and Behavioural Evidence (PRoBE) team is dedicated to the meta-analysis of EoRTc randomised clinical trial quality of life results. during the last five years, pooled data have revealed important results, such as prognostic indicators of survival, which have informed clinical practice. This research shows how the patient perspective in palliative and curative EoRTc trials has been considered of major importance. The inclusion of patient perspective in drug development shows that a more comprehensive hRQol assessment has taken place over time as better instruments have become available. as clinicians, regulatory bodies and industry acknowledge the value of the patient perspective, we expect that EoRTc will continue including hRQol endpoints where appropriate.","PeriodicalId":38554,"journal":{"name":"European Oncology and Haematology","volume":"191 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oncology and Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/EOH.2014.10.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
测量癌症患者的生活质量
©Touch MEdical MEdia 2013摘要什么是生活质量?长期以来,临床试验以临床终点为主导,但研究证明,与健康相关的生活质量(hRQol)只能通过患者报告的结果(PRos)由患者自己准确地捕捉到。美国食品和药物管理局将评价定义为直接来自患者的对患者健康状况任何方面的测量,即医生或其他任何人在不解释患者反应的情况下进行的测量。EoRTc QlQ-c30是世界上使用最广泛的癌症特异性hRQol问卷。它由EoRTc生活质量小组于1991年开发,已被翻译成60多种语言,并有40多个已开发或正在开发的癌症特定模块。面临的主要挑战之一是汇集数据并对封闭试验的结果进行荟萃分析。EoRTc患者报告结果和行为证据(PRoBE)团队致力于EoRTc随机临床试验生活质量结果的荟萃分析。在过去的五年中,汇集的数据揭示了重要的结果,如生存的预后指标,这些结果为临床实践提供了信息。这项研究表明,在姑息性和治疗性EoRTc试验中,患者的观点被认为是非常重要的。在药物开发中纳入患者的观点表明,随着时间的推移,随着更好的工具的出现,对hRQol进行了更全面的评估。随着临床医生、监管机构和行业认识到患者观点的价值,我们预计EoRTc将在适当的情况下继续包括hRQol终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。