Taxing or Taking? Property Rhetoric and the Justice of Taxation

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Laura R Biron
{"title":"Taxing or Taking? Property Rhetoric and the Justice of Taxation","authors":"Laura R Biron","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199609222.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter draws attention to a puzzle about the relevance of the concept of property to studies of taxation. On the one hand, rhetorical appeals to property rights are prevalent in popular debates about taxation. On the other hand, property theorists do not tend to apply their work directly to the analysis of taxation. Moreover, some theorists of taxation have suggested that the concept of property is neither important nor relevant to the study of taxation. What are we to make of this mismatch between popular rhetoric and theoretical argument? Chapter 4 illustrates some ways in which conceptual work on property is directly relevant to the study of taxation, and argues that taxation should occupy a more prominent place in the jurisprudence of property than it currently does.","PeriodicalId":36556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Australian Taxation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Australian Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199609222.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter draws attention to a puzzle about the relevance of the concept of property to studies of taxation. On the one hand, rhetorical appeals to property rights are prevalent in popular debates about taxation. On the other hand, property theorists do not tend to apply their work directly to the analysis of taxation. Moreover, some theorists of taxation have suggested that the concept of property is neither important nor relevant to the study of taxation. What are we to make of this mismatch between popular rhetoric and theoretical argument? Chapter 4 illustrates some ways in which conceptual work on property is directly relevant to the study of taxation, and argues that taxation should occupy a more prominent place in the jurisprudence of property than it currently does.
征税还是索取?财产修辞与税收公正
本章提请注意一个关于财产概念与税收研究的相关性的难题。一方面,在关于税收的流行辩论中,对财产权的修辞诉求很普遍。另一方面,财产理论家并不倾向于将他们的工作直接应用于税收分析。此外,一些税收理论家认为,财产的概念既不重要,也与税收研究无关。我们如何看待这种流行修辞与理论论证之间的不匹配?第4章阐述了财产概念研究与税收研究直接相关的一些方式,并认为税收应该在财产法学中占据比目前更突出的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Australian Taxation
Journal of Australian Taxation Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信