Mobeen Ur Rehman, I. Raheem, Abdel Razzaq Al Rababa'a, Nasir Ahmad, X. Vo
{"title":"Reassessing the Predictability of the Investor Sentiments on US Stocks: The Role of Uncertainty and Risks","authors":"Mobeen Ur Rehman, I. Raheem, Abdel Razzaq Al Rababa'a, Nasir Ahmad, X. Vo","doi":"10.1080/15427560.2022.2037598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We examine the predictive power of US investor sentiments on US sectoral returns and aggregated S&P 500 index in the presence of different risk and uncertainty indices. Investor sentiments are measured using the sentiment index proposed by Baker and Wurgler (2006). We also use bearish and bullish investor sentiment indices i.e., AAII sentiment indices, published by the American association of individual investors. We also use different risk and uncertainty indices i.e., economic policy uncertainty, financial uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and US equity market volatility. Results of the baseline model (i.e., the single model where the only predictor is sentiment index) show that the forecasting power of the predictor is weak. Augmenting the baseline model to account for uncertainty measures shows that the uncertainty's transmission impact is more accurate for out-of-sample forecasts than the single-factor model. We also highlight that the performance of the multi-factor predictive model incorporating USS B&W is superior to the benchmark model. Policy implications of the results are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":47016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Finance","volume":"52 1","pages":"450 - 465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2022.2037598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Abstract We examine the predictive power of US investor sentiments on US sectoral returns and aggregated S&P 500 index in the presence of different risk and uncertainty indices. Investor sentiments are measured using the sentiment index proposed by Baker and Wurgler (2006). We also use bearish and bullish investor sentiment indices i.e., AAII sentiment indices, published by the American association of individual investors. We also use different risk and uncertainty indices i.e., economic policy uncertainty, financial uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and US equity market volatility. Results of the baseline model (i.e., the single model where the only predictor is sentiment index) show that the forecasting power of the predictor is weak. Augmenting the baseline model to account for uncertainty measures shows that the uncertainty's transmission impact is more accurate for out-of-sample forecasts than the single-factor model. We also highlight that the performance of the multi-factor predictive model incorporating USS B&W is superior to the benchmark model. Policy implications of the results are also discussed.
期刊介绍:
In Journal of Behavioral Finance , leaders in many fields are brought together to address the implications of current work on individual and group emotion, cognition, and action for the behavior of investment markets. They include specialists in personality, social, and clinical psychology; psychiatry; organizational behavior; accounting; marketing; sociology; anthropology; behavioral economics; finance; and the multidisciplinary study of judgment and decision making. The journal will foster debate among groups who have keen insights into the behavioral patterns of markets but have not historically published in the more traditional financial and economic journals. Further, it will stimulate new interdisciplinary research and theory that will build a body of knowledge about the psychological influences on investment market fluctuations. The most obvious benefit will be a new understanding of investment markets that can greatly improve investment decision making. Another benefit will be the opportunity for behavioral scientists to expand the scope of their studies via the use of the enormous databases that document behavior in investment markets.