Impedance spike cut-off enhances safety of CLOSE-protocol guided ablation of atrial fibrillation

O. Krahnefeld, T. Agdirlioglu, P. Poley, J. Weil
{"title":"Impedance spike cut-off enhances safety of CLOSE-protocol guided ablation of atrial fibrillation","authors":"O. Krahnefeld, T. Agdirlioglu, P. Poley, J. Weil","doi":"10.1093/europace/euac053.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: None.\n \n \n \n Catheter ablation (CA) with radiofrequency (RF) energy using the CLOSE protocol has proven safety and efficacy in a large prospective multicenter study (1) with a rate of pericardial tamponade (PT) as low as 0.9%, thus with lower PT risk than reported by previous register data for PVI (2). PT may still become hazardous in the era of uninterrupted anticoagulation and may require urgent surgical repair. Steam pop is the major cause of PT during PVI with RF ablation and is usually preceded by steep impedance rise measured between tissue and tip of the RF catheter. The STOCKERT SMARTABLATE RF Generator as a core part of technology for CLOSE protocol guided PVI offers the opportunity to automatically stop RF energy delivery within 0.5 seconds if catheter impedance rises above a predefined value: impedance spike cut off (ISCO). The standard – manufacturer recommended – value for ISCO is 50 Ohms per 0.5 seconds.\n \n \n \n To investigate the effect of reduced ISCO during CLOSE protocol guided catheter ablation of AF on the occurrence of acute PT and pericardial effusion (PE) in a large single center series.\n \n \n \n We performed CLOSE protocol guided PVI procedures using Biosense Webster CARTO PRIME 3D navigation system, Smarttouch SF ablation catheter, VIZIGO steerable sheath, invasive blood pressure measurement via radial artery. We changed the STOCKERT SMARTABLATE generator settings to ISCO of 25 Ohms per 0.5 seconds. Cut off during ablation by ISCO led the operator to reduce contact force, angulation/orientation of catheter/steerable sheath, changing to jet ventilation if mechanical ventilation was present. A retrospective analysis of all procedures was performed. Investigation for PT by echocardiography was performed for every drop < 90mmHg systolic blood pressure, immediately after and one day post ablation. Statistical analysis was performed on the evaluable population.\n \n \n \n During 31 months of observation we performed 627 CLOSE protocol guided procedures: 409 PVI only, 218 PVI with additional ablations (cavotricuspid isthmus, slow pathway, additional LA lines, ethanol ablation of vein of marshall). We observed 3 (0.5%) PT immediately at the end of the procedure and no additional relevant PE the day after CA. Of the 3 PT, one patient needed urgent surgical repair and two were managed conservatively with pericardiocentesis and retransfusion.\n \n \n \n CLOSE protocol guided PVI is a very effective and safe intervention for treatment of AF. In the multicentre VISITAX trial, the rate of PT was reported with 3 events per 329 patients (0.9%). By reducing ISCO to 25 Ohms per 0.5 seconds, we could half the rate of PT found in the VISITAX trial. The generator cut off at ISCO of 25 Ohms per 0.5 seconds indicates a potentially dangerous position for ablation. Our data are limited due to the retrospective monocentric design and therefore the aformentioned approach should be evaluated prospectively.\n","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type of funding sources: None. Catheter ablation (CA) with radiofrequency (RF) energy using the CLOSE protocol has proven safety and efficacy in a large prospective multicenter study (1) with a rate of pericardial tamponade (PT) as low as 0.9%, thus with lower PT risk than reported by previous register data for PVI (2). PT may still become hazardous in the era of uninterrupted anticoagulation and may require urgent surgical repair. Steam pop is the major cause of PT during PVI with RF ablation and is usually preceded by steep impedance rise measured between tissue and tip of the RF catheter. The STOCKERT SMARTABLATE RF Generator as a core part of technology for CLOSE protocol guided PVI offers the opportunity to automatically stop RF energy delivery within 0.5 seconds if catheter impedance rises above a predefined value: impedance spike cut off (ISCO). The standard – manufacturer recommended – value for ISCO is 50 Ohms per 0.5 seconds. To investigate the effect of reduced ISCO during CLOSE protocol guided catheter ablation of AF on the occurrence of acute PT and pericardial effusion (PE) in a large single center series. We performed CLOSE protocol guided PVI procedures using Biosense Webster CARTO PRIME 3D navigation system, Smarttouch SF ablation catheter, VIZIGO steerable sheath, invasive blood pressure measurement via radial artery. We changed the STOCKERT SMARTABLATE generator settings to ISCO of 25 Ohms per 0.5 seconds. Cut off during ablation by ISCO led the operator to reduce contact force, angulation/orientation of catheter/steerable sheath, changing to jet ventilation if mechanical ventilation was present. A retrospective analysis of all procedures was performed. Investigation for PT by echocardiography was performed for every drop < 90mmHg systolic blood pressure, immediately after and one day post ablation. Statistical analysis was performed on the evaluable population. During 31 months of observation we performed 627 CLOSE protocol guided procedures: 409 PVI only, 218 PVI with additional ablations (cavotricuspid isthmus, slow pathway, additional LA lines, ethanol ablation of vein of marshall). We observed 3 (0.5%) PT immediately at the end of the procedure and no additional relevant PE the day after CA. Of the 3 PT, one patient needed urgent surgical repair and two were managed conservatively with pericardiocentesis and retransfusion. CLOSE protocol guided PVI is a very effective and safe intervention for treatment of AF. In the multicentre VISITAX trial, the rate of PT was reported with 3 events per 329 patients (0.9%). By reducing ISCO to 25 Ohms per 0.5 seconds, we could half the rate of PT found in the VISITAX trial. The generator cut off at ISCO of 25 Ohms per 0.5 seconds indicates a potentially dangerous position for ablation. Our data are limited due to the retrospective monocentric design and therefore the aformentioned approach should be evaluated prospectively.
阻抗尖峰切断提高了CLOSE-protocol引导心房颤动消融的安全性
资金来源类型:无。在一项大型前瞻性多中心研究中,采用CLOSE方案的射频(RF)能量导管消融(CA)的安全性和有效性已得到证实(1),心包填塞(PT)的发生率低至0.9%,因此其PT风险低于先前PVI登记数据的报道(2)。在不间断抗凝时代,PT仍可能变得危险,可能需要紧急手术修复。蒸汽爆裂是射频消融PVI期间PT的主要原因,通常在组织和射频导管尖端之间测量到的阻抗急剧上升之前。STOCKERT SMARTABLATE射频发生器作为CLOSE协议引导的PVI技术的核心部分,如果导管阻抗高于预定义值:阻抗尖峰切断(ISCO),则有机会在0.5秒内自动停止射频能量输送。ISCO的标准制造商推荐值为每0.5秒50欧姆。在一个大型单中心研究中,探讨在CLOSE方案引导下AF导管消融过程中ISCO降低对急性PT和心包积液(PE)发生的影响。我们使用Biosense Webster CARTO PRIME 3D导航系统,Smarttouch SF消融导管,VIZIGO可操纵鞘,经桡动脉进行有创血压测量,采用CLOSE协议指导PVI手术。我们将STOCKERT SMARTABLATE发电机设置为每0.5秒25欧姆的ISCO。ISCO在消融过程中切断,导致操作人员减少接触力,导管/可操纵护套的角度/方向,如果存在机械通气,则改为喷射通气。对所有手术进行回顾性分析。超声心动图检查收缩压< 90mmHg的每一滴,消融后立即和术后1天。对可评估人群进行统计分析。在31个月的观察中,我们进行了627例CLOSE方案指导的手术:409例仅PVI, 218例PVI伴有额外的消融(颈尖峡、慢通道、额外的LA线、马歇尔静脉的乙醇消融)。我们在手术结束时立即观察到3例(0.5%)PT, CA后第二天没有额外的相关PE。在3例PT中,1例患者需要紧急手术修复,2例患者采用心包穿刺和再输血保守处理。CLOSE方案指导的PVI是一种非常有效和安全的治疗房颤的干预措施。在多中心VISITAX试验中,每329例患者报告3例PT事件(0.9%)。通过将ISCO降低到每0.5秒25欧姆,我们可以将VISITAX试验中发现的PT率降低一半。发电机在每0.5秒25欧姆的ISCO切断时,表明烧蚀处于潜在的危险位置。由于回顾性单中心设计,我们的数据有限,因此上述方法应进行前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信