Comparison of 7th and 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast: A retrospective study

Princy Soman, A. Hemalatha, S. Nadipanna, K. Raju
{"title":"Comparison of 7th and 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast: A retrospective study","authors":"Princy Soman, A. Hemalatha, S. Nadipanna, K. Raju","doi":"10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_30_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system is a very important prognostic factor for treating patients with carcinoma breast. There has been a recent change in the staging of breast cancer, from the 7th edition to 8th edition AJCC. Hence, the present study aimed to analyze the stage migration from 7th to 8th edition AJCC staging in infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and comparison of each staging system with the Nottingham prognostic index (NPI) prognostic scoring system. Aims: The aim is to evaluate the stage migration between the 7th and 8th edition AJCC in IDC of the breast and compare both staging systems with the NPI prognostic scoring system. Settings and Design: In this retrospective study, we collected the clinical and pathological data from 56 IDC cases from January 2019 to June 2021 presenting at our institute. We restaged all the cases as per the prognostic staging system (8th AJCC) and calculated the survival status with NPI as long-term (5-year survival status) follow-up of the cases was not possible. Statistics: Categorical data were represented in the form of frequencies and proportions. Chi-square test or Fischer's exact test (for 2 × 2 tables only) was used as a test of significance for qualitative data. Continuous data were represented as mean and standard deviation. P value was calculated. Results: In this study, majority of the cases were in grade 1 and in Stage II. Among 16 cases in Stage II A, 7 (43.8%) showed down staging and 3 (18.8%) showed up staging, while 12 (70.6%)/17 cases in Stage II B showed down staging. When compared with NPI both 6th and 7th AJCC showed statistical significance. Conclusion: Stage migration (upstaging and down staging) was seen in the 8th edition AJCC when compared to the 7th edition AJCC. Both the staging system correlated with the NPI prognostic index. However, long-term follow-up of these patients must be done to look into the efficacy of the 8th AJCC staging system before changing the treatment protocol.","PeriodicalId":16923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_30_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system is a very important prognostic factor for treating patients with carcinoma breast. There has been a recent change in the staging of breast cancer, from the 7th edition to 8th edition AJCC. Hence, the present study aimed to analyze the stage migration from 7th to 8th edition AJCC staging in infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and comparison of each staging system with the Nottingham prognostic index (NPI) prognostic scoring system. Aims: The aim is to evaluate the stage migration between the 7th and 8th edition AJCC in IDC of the breast and compare both staging systems with the NPI prognostic scoring system. Settings and Design: In this retrospective study, we collected the clinical and pathological data from 56 IDC cases from January 2019 to June 2021 presenting at our institute. We restaged all the cases as per the prognostic staging system (8th AJCC) and calculated the survival status with NPI as long-term (5-year survival status) follow-up of the cases was not possible. Statistics: Categorical data were represented in the form of frequencies and proportions. Chi-square test or Fischer's exact test (for 2 × 2 tables only) was used as a test of significance for qualitative data. Continuous data were represented as mean and standard deviation. P value was calculated. Results: In this study, majority of the cases were in grade 1 and in Stage II. Among 16 cases in Stage II A, 7 (43.8%) showed down staging and 3 (18.8%) showed up staging, while 12 (70.6%)/17 cases in Stage II B showed down staging. When compared with NPI both 6th and 7th AJCC showed statistical significance. Conclusion: Stage migration (upstaging and down staging) was seen in the 8th edition AJCC when compared to the 7th edition AJCC. Both the staging system correlated with the NPI prognostic index. However, long-term follow-up of these patients must be done to look into the efficacy of the 8th AJCC staging system before changing the treatment protocol.
第七届和第八届美国肿瘤-淋巴结-转移联合委员会对乳腺浸润导管癌分期的比较:一项回顾性研究
背景:美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统是治疗乳腺癌患者的一个非常重要的预后因素。最近乳腺癌的分期有了变化,从第七版到第八版AJCC。因此,本研究旨在分析浸润性导管癌(IDC)从第7版到第8版AJCC分期的分期迁移,并将各分期系统与诺丁汉预后指数(NPI)预后评分系统进行比较。目的:目的是评估第7版和第8版AJCC在乳腺IDC中的分期转移,并将这两种分期系统与NPI预后评分系统进行比较。背景和设计:在这项回顾性研究中,我们收集了2019年1月至2021年6月在我院就诊的56例IDC患者的临床和病理资料。我们根据预后分期系统(第8期AJCC)对所有病例进行了重新分期,并计算了NPI的生存状况,因为无法对病例进行长期(5年生存状况)随访。统计学:分类数据以频率和比例的形式表示。对于定性数据,采用卡方检验或菲舍尔精确检验(仅适用于2 × 2表)作为显著性检验。连续数据用均值和标准差表示。计算P值。结果:在本研究中,大多数病例为1级和II期。16例A期患者中,7例(43.8%)出现分期下降,3例(18.8%)出现分期,17例B期患者中有12例(70.6%)出现分期下降。与NPI比较,第6和第7 AJCC均有统计学意义。结论:与第7版AJCC相比,第8版AJCC中出现了阶段迁移(上分期和下分期)。两种分期系统均与NPI预后指数相关。然而,在改变治疗方案之前,必须对这些患者进行长期随访,以了解AJCC第8分期系统的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信