Comparison of effectiveness of Reciproc, Wave One, Protaper, and One Shape rotary instruments in reduction of bacterial load in root canals

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia Pub Date : 2020-06-04 DOI:10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.10

A. Azizi, Reza Hatam, P. Soltani, S. Miri, R. Abiri

{"title":"Comparison of effectiveness of Reciproc, Wave One, Protaper, and One Shape rotary instruments in reduction of bacterial load in root canals","authors":"A. Azizi, Reza Hatam, P. Soltani, S. Miri, R. Abiri","doi":"10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare the effectiveness of Reciproc, Wave One, Protaper, and One Shape rotary instruments in reduction of E. faecalis in root canals. \nMethodology: In this in-vitro study, after initial stages of canal enlargement and irrigation, a suspension containing Entrococcus faecalis was inoculated into the root canals of 84 extracted single-canal premolars. The samples (apart from 2 positive and 2 negative controls) were randomly assigned into 4 groups according to rotary instruments used: Reciproc, Wave One, One Shape, Protaper. Each group was then subdivided to 2 groups based on irrigating solutions of normal saline and NaOCl. After instrumentation, the root canals were filled with brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth. Finally bacterial colony forming units (CFU) were counted. \nResults: Reduction in number of bacterial colonies before and after instrumentation and irrigation was not significantly different in different rotary instrument systems (P=0.128, F=1.955). However, NaOCl was more effective in reduction of bacterial load compared to normal saline (P<0.001, F=15.528). \nConclusions: All rotary instruments used in the study are effective in reduction of the bacterial load.","PeriodicalId":42221,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of Reciproc, Wave One, Protaper, and One Shape rotary instruments in reduction of E. faecalis in root canals. Methodology: In this in-vitro study, after initial stages of canal enlargement and irrigation, a suspension containing Entrococcus faecalis was inoculated into the root canals of 84 extracted single-canal premolars. The samples (apart from 2 positive and 2 negative controls) were randomly assigned into 4 groups according to rotary instruments used: Reciproc, Wave One, One Shape, Protaper. Each group was then subdivided to 2 groups based on irrigating solutions of normal saline and NaOCl. After instrumentation, the root canals were filled with brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth. Finally bacterial colony forming units (CFU) were counted. Results: Reduction in number of bacterial colonies before and after instrumentation and irrigation was not significantly different in different rotary instrument systems (P=0.128, F=1.955). However, NaOCl was more effective in reduction of bacterial load compared to normal saline (P<0.001, F=15.528). Conclusions: All rotary instruments used in the study are effective in reduction of the bacterial load.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reciproc、Wave One、Protaper和One Shape旋转器械减少根管内细菌负荷的效果比较

目的:比较Reciproc、Wave One、Protaper和One Shape旋转器械在根管内减少粪肠杆菌的效果。方法:在这项体外研究中，在初始阶段的根管扩大和冲洗后，将含有粪Entrococcus faecalis的悬浮液接种到84颗拔出的单管前磨牙的根管中。样本(除2例阳性对照和2例阴性对照)根据使用的旋转器械随机分为4组:Reciproc、Wave One、One Shape、Protaper。各组再以生理盐水和NaOCl灌洗液为基础再分为2组。预备后，用脑-心灌注(BHI)肉汤填充根管。最后统计菌落形成单位(CFU)。结果:不同旋转式仪器系统对仪器冲洗前后菌落数量的减少差异无统计学意义(P=0.128, F=1.955)。然而，与生理盐水相比，NaOCl在减少细菌负荷方面更有效(P<0.001, F=15.528)。结论:本研究中使用的所有旋转器械均能有效降低细菌负荷。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

25.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： The Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia was founded in 1987 and is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endodontics (SIE). It is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on clinical research and/or clinical methodology, case reports related to Endodontics. The Journal evaluates also contributes in restorative dentistry, dental traumatology, experimental pathophysiology, pharmacology and microbiology dealing with Endodontics.