Psicanálise e linguística: intersecções e cortes

M. Bueno, Carlos Henrique Kessler, R. T. Wieczorek
{"title":"Psicanálise e linguística: intersecções e cortes","authors":"M. Bueno, Carlos Henrique Kessler, R. T. Wieczorek","doi":"10.22409/1984-0292/2022/v34/6068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work was created as part of the studies of a research entitled “The clinical research in transference”. In this article, we reexamine some of linguistics concepts such as language, tongue, discourse, linguistic sign, significant, among others, and its articulations with de lacanian field in special the the significant logic. We will analyze linguistics references in Saussure, Jakobson and Benvenist’s works, beyond Lacan’texts and contemporaneous readings about the issue aiming to show some matters from the lacanian trajectory since the linguistic influence, but also considering their unique way of apprehending and using such knowledge. We will also present some comments on discordant elements between these two disciplines, which, throughout his teaching, led Lacan to a conceptual separation from linguistics. Such distancing was justified by the idea that psychoanalysis deals with the subject of the unconscious and what lies outside of language, differently from the linguistic that demonstrates the communicative and expressive functions of the language in the conscious mind.","PeriodicalId":12373,"journal":{"name":"Fractal: Revista de Psicologia","volume":"705 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fractal: Revista de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22409/1984-0292/2022/v34/6068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work was created as part of the studies of a research entitled “The clinical research in transference”. In this article, we reexamine some of linguistics concepts such as language, tongue, discourse, linguistic sign, significant, among others, and its articulations with de lacanian field in special the the significant logic. We will analyze linguistics references in Saussure, Jakobson and Benvenist’s works, beyond Lacan’texts and contemporaneous readings about the issue aiming to show some matters from the lacanian trajectory since the linguistic influence, but also considering their unique way of apprehending and using such knowledge. We will also present some comments on discordant elements between these two disciplines, which, throughout his teaching, led Lacan to a conceptual separation from linguistics. Such distancing was justified by the idea that psychoanalysis deals with the subject of the unconscious and what lies outside of language, differently from the linguistic that demonstrates the communicative and expressive functions of the language in the conscious mind.
精神分析与语言学:交叉与切割
这项工作是作为一项名为“移情的临床研究”的研究的一部分而创建的。在本文中,我们重新审视了语言学的一些概念,如语言、舌头、话语、语言符号、意义等,以及它们与拉康领域的关系,特别是意义逻辑。我们将分析索绪尔、雅各布森和本文尼斯特的著作中的语言学参考,超越拉康的文本和同时代的阅读,旨在展示拉康轨迹中的一些问题,因为语言学的影响,但也考虑到他们独特的理解和使用这些知识的方式。我们也将提出一些关于这两个学科之间的不和谐因素的评论,这在他的教学中,导致拉康从语言学的概念分离。这种距离是合理的,因为精神分析研究的是无意识的主体和语言之外的东西,不同于语言学,它展示的是语言在意识思维中的交流和表达功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信