Qiuxi Li, A. Subica, James M. Kendra, Saleem H. Ali
{"title":"Tradition or Modernization? The Dilemma of Chinese Indigenous Communities","authors":"Qiuxi Li, A. Subica, James M. Kendra, Saleem H. Ali","doi":"10.1080/13527258.2023.2193818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the indigenous communities in China’s Guizhou Province, people are struggling to balance tradition with modernisation. As fires have long plagued these villages, post-disaster reconstruction has intensified the tradition/modernity tension and left people with a complex dilemma: should traditional wooden houses be restored, or should one, instead, pursue a safer and modern dwelling in concrete houses? Through the lens of housing reconstruction, this paper aims to address this contradiction between the social benefits of heritage preservation and the indigenous rights for development in the context of disaster risk and modernisation in Guizhou Province. Analysing 134 surveys and 29 interviews collected via ethnographic fieldwork, this study’s findings reveal two core themes. First, the presence of a prevailing preference among indigenous Chinese for modernity, which also challenged the conventional wisdom that everyone endorses heritage preservation. Second, a social expectation among indigenous Chinese to be faithful to their cultural traditions and to resist development; which could be perceived as a continuation of the historical injustices and exploitations perpetrated against them. Overall, study findings call for a more inclusive and comprehensive discourse of indigenous preservation and development.","PeriodicalId":47807,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","volume":"94 1","pages":"382 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2193818","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT In the indigenous communities in China’s Guizhou Province, people are struggling to balance tradition with modernisation. As fires have long plagued these villages, post-disaster reconstruction has intensified the tradition/modernity tension and left people with a complex dilemma: should traditional wooden houses be restored, or should one, instead, pursue a safer and modern dwelling in concrete houses? Through the lens of housing reconstruction, this paper aims to address this contradiction between the social benefits of heritage preservation and the indigenous rights for development in the context of disaster risk and modernisation in Guizhou Province. Analysing 134 surveys and 29 interviews collected via ethnographic fieldwork, this study’s findings reveal two core themes. First, the presence of a prevailing preference among indigenous Chinese for modernity, which also challenged the conventional wisdom that everyone endorses heritage preservation. Second, a social expectation among indigenous Chinese to be faithful to their cultural traditions and to resist development; which could be perceived as a continuation of the historical injustices and exploitations perpetrated against them. Overall, study findings call for a more inclusive and comprehensive discourse of indigenous preservation and development.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Heritage Studies ( IJHS ) is the interdisciplinary academic, refereed journal for scholars and practitioners with a common interest in heritage. The Journal encourages debate over the nature and meaning of heritage as well as its links to memory, identities and place. Articles may include issues emerging from Heritage Studies, Museum Studies, History, Tourism Studies, Sociology, Anthropology, Memory Studies, Cultural Geography, Law, Cultural Studies, and Interpretation and Design.