Tradition or Modernization? The Dilemma of Chinese Indigenous Communities

IF 2 1区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qiuxi Li, A. Subica, James M. Kendra, Saleem H. Ali
{"title":"Tradition or Modernization? The Dilemma of Chinese Indigenous Communities","authors":"Qiuxi Li, A. Subica, James M. Kendra, Saleem H. Ali","doi":"10.1080/13527258.2023.2193818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the indigenous communities in China’s Guizhou Province, people are struggling to balance tradition with modernisation. As fires have long plagued these villages, post-disaster reconstruction has intensified the tradition/modernity tension and left people with a complex dilemma: should traditional wooden houses be restored, or should one, instead, pursue a safer and modern dwelling in concrete houses? Through the lens of housing reconstruction, this paper aims to address this contradiction between the social benefits of heritage preservation and the indigenous rights for development in the context of disaster risk and modernisation in Guizhou Province. Analysing 134 surveys and 29 interviews collected via ethnographic fieldwork, this study’s findings reveal two core themes. First, the presence of a prevailing preference among indigenous Chinese for modernity, which also challenged the conventional wisdom that everyone endorses heritage preservation. Second, a social expectation among indigenous Chinese to be faithful to their cultural traditions and to resist development; which could be perceived as a continuation of the historical injustices and exploitations perpetrated against them. Overall, study findings call for a more inclusive and comprehensive discourse of indigenous preservation and development.","PeriodicalId":47807,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","volume":"94 1","pages":"382 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2193818","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the indigenous communities in China’s Guizhou Province, people are struggling to balance tradition with modernisation. As fires have long plagued these villages, post-disaster reconstruction has intensified the tradition/modernity tension and left people with a complex dilemma: should traditional wooden houses be restored, or should one, instead, pursue a safer and modern dwelling in concrete houses? Through the lens of housing reconstruction, this paper aims to address this contradiction between the social benefits of heritage preservation and the indigenous rights for development in the context of disaster risk and modernisation in Guizhou Province. Analysing 134 surveys and 29 interviews collected via ethnographic fieldwork, this study’s findings reveal two core themes. First, the presence of a prevailing preference among indigenous Chinese for modernity, which also challenged the conventional wisdom that everyone endorses heritage preservation. Second, a social expectation among indigenous Chinese to be faithful to their cultural traditions and to resist development; which could be perceived as a continuation of the historical injustices and exploitations perpetrated against them. Overall, study findings call for a more inclusive and comprehensive discourse of indigenous preservation and development.
传统还是现代化?中国土著社区的困境
在中国贵州省的土著社区,人们正在努力平衡传统与现代化。由于火灾长期困扰着这些村庄,灾后重建加剧了传统与现代的紧张关系,人们陷入了一个复杂的困境:是应该恢复传统的木制房屋,还是应该在混凝土房屋中追求更安全、更现代的居住?本文旨在通过房屋重建的视角,解决灾害风险和现代化背景下贵州省遗产保护的社会效益与土著发展权之间的矛盾。本研究分析了134项调查和29次访谈,这些访谈是通过民族志田野调查收集的,研究结果揭示了两个核心主题。首先,中国原住民普遍偏好现代化,这也挑战了人人都支持遗产保护的传统观念。第二,中国原住民忠于自己的文化传统、抵制发展的社会期望;这可以被看作是历史上对他们的不公正和剥削的延续。总体而言,研究结果呼吁对土著保护和发展进行更具包容性和综合性的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Heritage Studies ( IJHS ) is the interdisciplinary academic, refereed journal for scholars and practitioners with a common interest in heritage. The Journal encourages debate over the nature and meaning of heritage as well as its links to memory, identities and place. Articles may include issues emerging from Heritage Studies, Museum Studies, History, Tourism Studies, Sociology, Anthropology, Memory Studies, Cultural Geography, Law, Cultural Studies, and Interpretation and Design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信