Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Negative-pressure Drain in Cases of Infective Laparotomies

A. Goyal, Rajkamal Kanojiya
{"title":"Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Negative-pressure Drain in Cases of Infective Laparotomies","authors":"A. Goyal, Rajkamal Kanojiya","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10057-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A bstrAct Wound infection is the most common complication in patients who underwent infective laparotomies, leading to postoperative complications, pus discharge, prolonged hospitalization, increased cost of treatment, etc. Even after sensitive-based antibiotic use and judicious irrigation of wound with saline, it remained a major concern. Aims and objectives: To evaluate the role of closed suction drainage in reduction of postoperative wound infection in cases of infective laparotomies when compared to laparotomy wounds without closed suction drainage. To evaluate whether negative-pressure closed suction drainage is effective in reducing the hospital stays. To evaluate whether negative-pressure closed suction drainage is effective in reducing the cost of treatment. Materials and methods: This study is conducted on patients who underwent infective laparotomies and we divided it into two groups: one with subcutaneous negative-pressure drain in and other without it. Conclusion: Closed suction drain prevented postoperative wound infection significantly, reduces hospital stay, reduces cost of treatment, and helped in early healing of wound and removal of sutures.","PeriodicalId":16223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10057-0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A bstrAct Wound infection is the most common complication in patients who underwent infective laparotomies, leading to postoperative complications, pus discharge, prolonged hospitalization, increased cost of treatment, etc. Even after sensitive-based antibiotic use and judicious irrigation of wound with saline, it remained a major concern. Aims and objectives: To evaluate the role of closed suction drainage in reduction of postoperative wound infection in cases of infective laparotomies when compared to laparotomy wounds without closed suction drainage. To evaluate whether negative-pressure closed suction drainage is effective in reducing the hospital stays. To evaluate whether negative-pressure closed suction drainage is effective in reducing the cost of treatment. Materials and methods: This study is conducted on patients who underwent infective laparotomies and we divided it into two groups: one with subcutaneous negative-pressure drain in and other without it. Conclusion: Closed suction drain prevented postoperative wound infection significantly, reduces hospital stay, reduces cost of treatment, and helped in early healing of wound and removal of sutures.
皮下负压引流在感染性剖腹手术中的应用效果
切口感染是感染性剖腹手术患者最常见的并发症,可导致术后并发症、脓流、住院时间延长、治疗费用增加等。即使在使用敏感抗生素和明智地用生理盐水冲洗伤口后,它仍然是一个主要问题。目的与目的:评价密闭吸引引流在感染性剖腹手术中与不采用密闭吸引引流的剖腹手术伤口减少术后伤口感染的作用。评价负压封闭吸引引流术对缩短住院时间是否有效。评价负压封闭吸引引流术是否能有效降低治疗费用。材料与方法:本研究以感染性剖腹手术患者为研究对象,将其分为皮下负压引流组和非皮下负压引流组。结论:闭式抽吸引流可明显预防术后创面感染,缩短住院时间,降低治疗费用,有利于创面早期愈合及拆线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信