Effect of six month storage on microtensile bond strength of new elective etching adhesive system on dentin in self-etching or etch-and-rinse approach

Leonardo Colombo Zeidan , André Figueiredo Reis , Alessandra Cassoni , José Augusto Rodrigues
{"title":"Effect of six month storage on microtensile bond strength of new elective etching adhesive system on dentin in self-etching or etch-and-rinse approach","authors":"Leonardo Colombo Zeidan ,&nbsp;André Figueiredo Reis ,&nbsp;Alessandra Cassoni ,&nbsp;José Augusto Rodrigues","doi":"10.1016/j.sjdr.2016.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin of an elective etching adhesive system applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etching (SE) mode after 6-months of storage in water. Thirty-six caries-free, human third molars were collected and stored in a 0.1% thymol solution. Dentin surfaces were exposed by 600-grit silicon carbide paper and teeth were divided into six groups (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6), according to the adhesive systems: a 2-step SE system, Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); a 1-step SE adhesive Adper Prompt L-Pop (LPOP); Scotchbond Universal applied as a 1-step SE adhesive (SBU-SE) and applied as a 2-step ER adhesive (SBU-ER); and two 2-step ER adhesives: Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP) and Optibond Solo Plus (OSP). Composite build-ups were constructed with TPH3 and cured in three increments of 2<!--> <!-->mm each. Specimens were sectioned with a slow-speed diamond saw under water in <em>X</em> and <em>Y</em> directions to obtain bonded beams that were tested to failure in tension at a crosshead speed of 1.0<!--> <!-->mm/min after one week or 6 months of storage in water. Statistical analyses were computed using Repeated-Measures ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD Tests (<em>α</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05). There were no significant differences between 1-week and 6-months. SBU-ER and SBUSE showed the highest μTBS values and statistically differed from LPOP (Fisher’s LSD). The SBP, OSP, and CSE groups showed intermediary μTBS and did not differ statistically from SBU-ER, SBUSE or LPOP, which presented the lowest μTBS values. The use of elective etching adhesive system in dentin with the etch-and-rinse or self-etching approach did not compromise the bond strength and showed stable bonds after six months of storage in water.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101249,"journal":{"name":"The Saudi Journal for Dental Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 5-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sjdr.2016.06.006","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Saudi Journal for Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352003516300272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin of an elective etching adhesive system applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etching (SE) mode after 6-months of storage in water. Thirty-six caries-free, human third molars were collected and stored in a 0.1% thymol solution. Dentin surfaces were exposed by 600-grit silicon carbide paper and teeth were divided into six groups (n = 6), according to the adhesive systems: a 2-step SE system, Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); a 1-step SE adhesive Adper Prompt L-Pop (LPOP); Scotchbond Universal applied as a 1-step SE adhesive (SBU-SE) and applied as a 2-step ER adhesive (SBU-ER); and two 2-step ER adhesives: Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP) and Optibond Solo Plus (OSP). Composite build-ups were constructed with TPH3 and cured in three increments of 2 mm each. Specimens were sectioned with a slow-speed diamond saw under water in X and Y directions to obtain bonded beams that were tested to failure in tension at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min after one week or 6 months of storage in water. Statistical analyses were computed using Repeated-Measures ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD Tests (α = 0.05). There were no significant differences between 1-week and 6-months. SBU-ER and SBUSE showed the highest μTBS values and statistically differed from LPOP (Fisher’s LSD). The SBP, OSP, and CSE groups showed intermediary μTBS and did not differ statistically from SBU-ER, SBUSE or LPOP, which presented the lowest μTBS values. The use of elective etching adhesive system in dentin with the etch-and-rinse or self-etching approach did not compromise the bond strength and showed stable bonds after six months of storage in water.

新型选择性蚀刻胶体系在自蚀刻或蚀刻-冲洗方法下对牙本质微拉伸结合强度的影响
本研究的目的是评价选择性蚀刻胶体系在蚀刻-冲洗(ER)或自蚀刻(SE)模式下在水中保存6个月后与牙本质的微拉伸结合强度(μTBS)。收集36颗无龋的人第三磨牙,保存在0.1%百里酚溶液中。牙本质表面用600粒碳化硅纸暴露,根据粘接系统分为6组(n = 6):两步SE系统,Clearfil SE Bond (CSE);1步SE胶粘剂Adper Prompt L-Pop (LPOP);Scotchbond Universal作为1步SE粘合剂(SBU-SE)和作为2步ER粘合剂(SBU-ER)应用;以及两种双步ER胶粘剂:Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP)和Optibond Solo Plus (OSP)。用TPH3构建复合材料,并以每次2 mm的三次增量进行固化。用慢速金刚石锯在水下对试件进行X、Y方向的切割,得到粘结梁,在水中保存1周或6个月后,以1.0 mm/min的十字速度进行拉伸破坏试验。统计学分析采用重复测量方差分析(Repeated-Measures ANOVA)和Fisher’s LSD检验(α = 0.05)。1周与6个月无显著差异。SBU-ER和sbu - use的μTBS值最高,与LPOP (Fisher’s LSD)有统计学差异。SBP、OSP和CSE组表现为中间μTBS,与SBU-ER、sbu - use和LPOP组的μTBS值最低,差异无统计学意义。在牙本质中使用选择性蚀刻胶粘剂系统与蚀刻-冲洗或自蚀刻方法不影响粘结强度,并且在水中储存六个月后显示出稳定的粘结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信