KONTROVERSI JIDAT HITAM DI MADURA: Studi Penafsiran Komparatif-Sektarian QS. al-Fatḥ [48]: 29

Mohammad Subhan Zamzami
{"title":"KONTROVERSI JIDAT HITAM DI MADURA: Studi Penafsiran Komparatif-Sektarian QS. al-Fatḥ [48]: 29","authors":"Mohammad Subhan Zamzami","doi":"10.21580/TEO.2018.29.2.2828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reveals athar al-sujūd’s interpretation in QS. al-Fatḥ [48]: 29 behind the controversy of the stigma of black foreheads against certain groups in Islam. This paper is a result of literature and fieldwork research based on comparative interpretation methods (tafsīr muqārin) on five tafsīr books from different schools and interviews with some figures from different religious organizations in Madura. This research has discovered that the controversy from the stigma of a black forehead was not only triggered by different interpretations of athar al-sujūd in QS. al-Fatḥ [48]: 29, but also by several hadiths narrated by Aḥmad, al-Bayhaqī, and al-Bukhārī, which cause controversy among Muslims in Madura. In fact, no group in Islam wants such controversy, either as the subject of the accuser or the accused as a group of black foreheads.","PeriodicalId":56255,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Theologia","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Theologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21580/TEO.2018.29.2.2828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reveals athar al-sujūd’s interpretation in QS. al-Fatḥ [48]: 29 behind the controversy of the stigma of black foreheads against certain groups in Islam. This paper is a result of literature and fieldwork research based on comparative interpretation methods (tafsīr muqārin) on five tafsīr books from different schools and interviews with some figures from different religious organizations in Madura. This research has discovered that the controversy from the stigma of a black forehead was not only triggered by different interpretations of athar al-sujūd in QS. al-Fatḥ [48]: 29, but also by several hadiths narrated by Aḥmad, al-Bayhaqī, and al-Bukhārī, which cause controversy among Muslims in Madura. In fact, no group in Islam wants such controversy, either as the subject of the accuser or the accused as a group of black foreheads.
马杜拉黑人额头争议:QS的对偶解释研究。al-Fatḥ[48]:29
本文揭示了athar al-sujūd在QS中的解释。al- fattah[48]: 29在伊斯兰教中,黑额头对某些群体的污名争议背后。本文采用比较解释方法(tafsīr muqārin),对来自不同学校的五本tafsīr书籍进行了文献和实地调查,并对马杜拉不同宗教组织的一些人物进行了访谈。这项研究发现,黑额头的耻辱引发的争议不仅仅是由于QS对athar al-sujūd的不同解释。al- fattah[48]: 29,还包括Aḥmad、al- bayhaqi和al-Bukhārī所叙述的几部圣训,这些圣训在马杜拉的穆斯林中引起了争议。事实上,伊斯兰教中没有一个团体想要这样的争议,无论是作为原告的主体,还是作为一群黑额头的被告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信