Quantity-based or share-based? Discount schemes for the manufacturer when facing two competing retailers

Wenhui Zhou, Hongmei Yang
{"title":"Quantity-based or share-based? Discount schemes for the manufacturer when facing two competing retailers","authors":"Wenhui Zhou, Hongmei Yang","doi":"10.1108/mscra-10-2022-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe authors investigate the manufacturer's choice of discount schemes in a supply chain with competing retailers.Design/methodology/approachUsing a game-theoretic model, the authors build two discount frameworks and compare and analyze the effects of different discount schemes on the performance of supply chain members.FindingsThe authors find that the retail price (market demand) in the quantity discount scheme is always higher (lower) than that in the market share discount scheme. The authors also find that the retailers' preference for discount schemes is antithetical to the manufacturer's preference in most cases. However, under certain conditions, there will be a win-win situation where Pareto-optimization occurs between the manufacturer and retailers when they choose the same discount scheme.Research limitations/implicationsOn the one hand, the authors assume that the two retailers are symmetrical in market size and operation efficiency. It would be interesting to study the effect of different discount schemes on retailers when the retailers have different market sizes or operating efficiency. On the other hand, the authors study the manufacturer's choice of discount schemes in a supply chain with one common manufacturer and two competing retailers. However, in practice, there exist other supply chain structures. Future research can examine the problem of choices of discount schemes in other different supply chain structures.Practical implicationsThis paper help retailers and manufacturers to choose the best discount schemes.Social implicationsThis paper suggests that a high discount scale is not always beneficial (detrimental) to retailers (the manufacture).Originality/valueThe authors build two discount schemes (the quantity and the market share) in a supply chain consisting of one manufacturer and two retailers, and the authors focus on the effects of different discount schemes on the competition between two retailers. By comparing the two discount schemes, the authors study which discount scheme is the better choice for the manufacturer when facing competing retailers.","PeriodicalId":18614,"journal":{"name":"Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mscra-10-2022-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe authors investigate the manufacturer's choice of discount schemes in a supply chain with competing retailers.Design/methodology/approachUsing a game-theoretic model, the authors build two discount frameworks and compare and analyze the effects of different discount schemes on the performance of supply chain members.FindingsThe authors find that the retail price (market demand) in the quantity discount scheme is always higher (lower) than that in the market share discount scheme. The authors also find that the retailers' preference for discount schemes is antithetical to the manufacturer's preference in most cases. However, under certain conditions, there will be a win-win situation where Pareto-optimization occurs between the manufacturer and retailers when they choose the same discount scheme.Research limitations/implicationsOn the one hand, the authors assume that the two retailers are symmetrical in market size and operation efficiency. It would be interesting to study the effect of different discount schemes on retailers when the retailers have different market sizes or operating efficiency. On the other hand, the authors study the manufacturer's choice of discount schemes in a supply chain with one common manufacturer and two competing retailers. However, in practice, there exist other supply chain structures. Future research can examine the problem of choices of discount schemes in other different supply chain structures.Practical implicationsThis paper help retailers and manufacturers to choose the best discount schemes.Social implicationsThis paper suggests that a high discount scale is not always beneficial (detrimental) to retailers (the manufacture).Originality/valueThe authors build two discount schemes (the quantity and the market share) in a supply chain consisting of one manufacturer and two retailers, and the authors focus on the effects of different discount schemes on the competition between two retailers. By comparing the two discount schemes, the authors study which discount scheme is the better choice for the manufacturer when facing competing retailers.
基于数量还是基于份额?制造商面对两家竞争零售商时的折扣方案
目的研究制造商在有竞争零售商的供应链中对折扣方案的选择。运用博弈论模型,作者构建了两个折扣框架,并比较分析了不同折扣方案对供应链成员绩效的影响。研究发现,数量折扣方案的零售价格(市场需求)总是高于(低于)市场份额折扣方案。作者还发现,在大多数情况下,零售商对折扣方案的偏好与制造商的偏好是相反的。但是,在一定条件下,当制造商和零售商选择相同的折扣方案时,会出现帕累托最优的双赢局面。一方面,作者假设两家零售商在市场规模和运营效率上是对称的。当零售商具有不同的市场规模或经营效率时,研究不同的折扣方案对零售商的影响是非常有趣的。另一方面,作者研究了在一个共同制造商和两个竞争零售商的供应链中制造商对折扣方案的选择。然而,在实践中,存在着其他的供应链结构。未来的研究可以考察其他不同供应链结构中折扣方案的选择问题。实际意义本文帮助零售商和制造商选择最佳的折扣方案。这篇论文表明,高折扣规模并不总是对零售商(制造商)有利(有害)。在由一个制造商和两个零售商组成的供应链中,作者建立了两种折扣方案(数量和市场份额),并重点研究了不同折扣方案对两个零售商之间竞争的影响。通过对两种折扣方案的比较,研究了制造商在面对竞争零售商时,哪种折扣方案是更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信