How to strengthen interdisciplinarity in ecohydraulics? Outcomes from ISE 2018

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
R. Casas‐Mulet, D. Vanzo, Ana Adeva-Bustos, Camille J. Macnaughton, M. Stewardson, G. Pasternack, E. Enders, F. Dyer
{"title":"How to strengthen interdisciplinarity in ecohydraulics? Outcomes from ISE 2018","authors":"R. Casas‐Mulet, D. Vanzo, Ana Adeva-Bustos, Camille J. Macnaughton, M. Stewardson, G. Pasternack, E. Enders, F. Dyer","doi":"10.1080/24705357.2020.1813057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Interdisciplinary approaches are required to tackle complex environmental issues as freshwater ecosystems face unprecedented pressures globally. The emerging Ecohydraulics field of research should, therefore, take steps towards developing true interdisciplinarity to adapt to a continuing changing world. This study contributes to the ongoing discussion on interdisciplinarity in Ecohydraulics and shapes its growth by identifying key actions, actors and implementation strategies that can strengthen it. Based on an online questionnaire and a workshop involving over 150 early and established careers, we present a list of 20 prioritised actions that will help engage the research community towards specific goals and will result in increased interdisciplinary outcomes. While early career researchers (ECRs) have taken the lead on creating this roadmap, its implementation should be a joint responsibility of both ECRs, established career scientists, groups, and institutions within Ecohydraulics. The list of identified actions and assigned responsibility should, therefore, be considered a conversation starter. Continued revision of the here-stated approaches will be required in the future as the field of research and its community progresses. With this contribution, we resume a critical reflection on where the Ecohydraulics field of research and community stand today and suggest where resources should be invested in the long-term to consolidate the inherent interdisciplinarity in Ecohydraulics.","PeriodicalId":93201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ecohydraulics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ecohydraulics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2020.1813057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Interdisciplinary approaches are required to tackle complex environmental issues as freshwater ecosystems face unprecedented pressures globally. The emerging Ecohydraulics field of research should, therefore, take steps towards developing true interdisciplinarity to adapt to a continuing changing world. This study contributes to the ongoing discussion on interdisciplinarity in Ecohydraulics and shapes its growth by identifying key actions, actors and implementation strategies that can strengthen it. Based on an online questionnaire and a workshop involving over 150 early and established careers, we present a list of 20 prioritised actions that will help engage the research community towards specific goals and will result in increased interdisciplinary outcomes. While early career researchers (ECRs) have taken the lead on creating this roadmap, its implementation should be a joint responsibility of both ECRs, established career scientists, groups, and institutions within Ecohydraulics. The list of identified actions and assigned responsibility should, therefore, be considered a conversation starter. Continued revision of the here-stated approaches will be required in the future as the field of research and its community progresses. With this contribution, we resume a critical reflection on where the Ecohydraulics field of research and community stand today and suggest where resources should be invested in the long-term to consolidate the inherent interdisciplinarity in Ecohydraulics.
如何加强生态水力学的跨学科研究?2018年ISE的结果
随着全球淡水生态系统面临前所未有的压力,需要跨学科的方法来解决复杂的环境问题。因此,新兴的生态水力学研究领域应该采取措施,发展真正的跨学科,以适应不断变化的世界。这项研究有助于正在进行的生态水力学跨学科的讨论,并通过确定可以加强它的关键行动、参与者和实施策略来塑造它的发展。基于一份在线调查问卷和一个涉及150多个早期和成熟职业的研讨会,我们提出了20个优先行动的清单,这些行动将有助于使研究界参与到具体目标中来,并将导致跨学科成果的增加。虽然早期职业研究人员(ecr)率先制定了这一路线图,但其实施应该是ecr、生态水力学领域成熟的职业科学家、团体和机构的共同责任。因此,确定的行动和分配的责任列表应该被视为对话的开始。随着研究领域及其社区的发展,今后将需要继续修订这里所述的方法。有了这一贡献,我们重新开始对生态水力学领域的研究和社区立场进行批判性反思,并建议在长期内应该投入资源以巩固生态水力学固有的跨学科性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信