Robotic and Advanced Laparoscopic Surgical Training in European Gynecological Oncology Trainees.

Carmen Gan, Michaela Bossart, Jurgen Piek, Michael Halaska, Dimitrios Haidopoulos, Ignacio Zapardiel, Jacek P Grabowski, Vesna Kesic, Rainer Kimmig, David Cibula, Eric Lambaudie, Rene Verheijen, Ranjit Manchanda
{"title":"Robotic and Advanced Laparoscopic Surgical Training in European Gynecological Oncology Trainees.","authors":"Carmen Gan, Michaela Bossart, Jurgen Piek, Michael Halaska, Dimitrios Haidopoulos, Ignacio Zapardiel, Jacek P Grabowski, Vesna Kesic, Rainer Kimmig, David Cibula, Eric Lambaudie, Rene Verheijen, Ranjit Manchanda","doi":"10.1097/IGC.0000000000000879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advanced minimal access surgical training is an important component of training in gynecological oncology (GO). Europe-wide data on this topic are lacking. We present data on availability and trainee experience of advanced laparoscopic surgical (ALS) and robotic surgical (RS) training in GO across Europe.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective web-based anonymized survey of European GO trainees was sent to the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists members/trainees. It included sociodemographic information and specific questions pertaining to training experience or satisfaction in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. χ test was used for evaluating categorical variables and Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis (nonparametric) tests for continuous variables between 2 and more independent groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 113 GO trainees from 29 countries responded. The mean (standard deviation) age was 35.2 (6.1) years, 59.3% were men, 40.7% were women, and 46% were in accredited training posts. The ALS and RS training was offered in only 43% and 23% of institutes respectively, and 54% and 23% of trainees had undergone some form of formal or informal training in ALS and RS respectively. A total of 62.4% felt that RS should be a formal component of GO training programs. A total of 61% and 35% planned to go outside their institute for ALS or RS training respectively. Trainees rating (1-5 scale) of their open surgery and ALS or RS skills (3.3/2.6/1.9) and training experience (3.5/2.8/2.1), respectively, were higher for open surgery than ALS or RS (P < 0.0005). Accredited posts were more likely than nonaccredited posts to offer ALS training (60%/31%, P = 0.002), formal training schedules (27.9%/4.4%, P = 0.003), and use of logbooks (46%/23%, P = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Training and experience in ALS and RS are poorly rated by GO trainees across Europe, and only few centers offer this. There is an urgent need to expand and harmonize training opportunities for ALS and RS. Most trainees want RS included as a formal component of their training.</p>","PeriodicalId":13983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"7 1","pages":"375-381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Advanced minimal access surgical training is an important component of training in gynecological oncology (GO). Europe-wide data on this topic are lacking. We present data on availability and trainee experience of advanced laparoscopic surgical (ALS) and robotic surgical (RS) training in GO across Europe.

Method: A prospective web-based anonymized survey of European GO trainees was sent to the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists members/trainees. It included sociodemographic information and specific questions pertaining to training experience or satisfaction in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. χ test was used for evaluating categorical variables and Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis (nonparametric) tests for continuous variables between 2 and more independent groups.

Results: A total of 113 GO trainees from 29 countries responded. The mean (standard deviation) age was 35.2 (6.1) years, 59.3% were men, 40.7% were women, and 46% were in accredited training posts. The ALS and RS training was offered in only 43% and 23% of institutes respectively, and 54% and 23% of trainees had undergone some form of formal or informal training in ALS and RS respectively. A total of 62.4% felt that RS should be a formal component of GO training programs. A total of 61% and 35% planned to go outside their institute for ALS or RS training respectively. Trainees rating (1-5 scale) of their open surgery and ALS or RS skills (3.3/2.6/1.9) and training experience (3.5/2.8/2.1), respectively, were higher for open surgery than ALS or RS (P < 0.0005). Accredited posts were more likely than nonaccredited posts to offer ALS training (60%/31%, P = 0.002), formal training schedules (27.9%/4.4%, P = 0.003), and use of logbooks (46%/23%, P = 0.035).

Conclusions: Training and experience in ALS and RS are poorly rated by GO trainees across Europe, and only few centers offer this. There is an urgent need to expand and harmonize training opportunities for ALS and RS. Most trainees want RS included as a formal component of their training.

机器人和先进腹腔镜手术培训在欧洲妇科肿瘤学员。
介绍:先进的微创手术培训是妇科肿瘤学(GO)培训的重要组成部分。欧洲范围内关于这一主题的数据缺乏。我们提供了关于欧洲GO的先进腹腔镜手术(ALS)和机器人手术(RS)培训的可用性和学员经验的数据。方法:向欧洲青年妇科肿瘤学家网络成员/学员发送了一份关于欧洲GO学员的前瞻性网络匿名调查。它包括社会人口统计信息以及与腹腔镜和机器人手术的培训经验或满意度有关的具体问题。用χ检验评价分类变量,用Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis(非参数)检验评价2个及以上独立组间的连续变量。结果:共有来自29个国家的113名GO学员参与了调查。平均(标准差)年龄为35.2(6.1)岁,男性占59.3%,女性占40.7%,46%在认可的培训岗位。分别只有43%和23%的机构提供渐冻人症和渐冻人症培训,54%和23%的学员分别接受过某种形式的渐冻人症和渐冻人症的正式或非正式培训。62.4%的受访者认为RS应该成为GO培训项目的正式组成部分。分别有61%和35%的人计划到校外接受渐冻人症或RS培训。学员对开放手术和ALS或RS技能(3.3/2.6/1.9)、培训经验(3.5/2.8/2.1)评分(1-5分制)分别高于ALS或RS (P < 0.0005)。认证岗位比非认证岗位更有可能提供ALS培训(60%/31%,P = 0.002)、正式培训计划(27.9%/4.4%,P = 0.003)和使用日志(46%/23%,P = 0.035)。结论:在整个欧洲,GO学员对ALS和RS的培训和经验评价很差,只有少数中心提供这种培训。迫切需要扩大和协调肌萎缩侧索硬化症和肌萎缩侧索硬化症的培训机会。大多数受训人员希望将肌萎缩侧索硬化症作为其培训的正式组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书