The effect of propofol and sevoflurane on antioxidants and proinflammatory cytokines in a porcine ischemia–reperfusion model

Hung-Tsung Hsiao, Hung Wu, Pei-Chi Huang, Yu-Chuang Tsai, Yen-Chin Liu
{"title":"The effect of propofol and sevoflurane on antioxidants and proinflammatory cytokines in a porcine ischemia–reperfusion model","authors":"Hung-Tsung Hsiao,&nbsp;Hung Wu,&nbsp;Pei-Chi Huang,&nbsp;Yu-Chuang Tsai,&nbsp;Yen-Chin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.aat.2015.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Ischemia–reperfusion (IR) features massive oxidative stress of tissues and cytokine response. Propofol and sevoflurane, both of which are commonly used anesthetics, are thought to have different antioxidant activities. The aim of this study is to delineate the influence of these two drugs on the production of free radicals and proinflammatory cytokines in IR conditions via <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> models.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An <em>in vitro</em> IR model was performed by incubating porcine cells (including mononuclear cells, and coronary and aortic smooth muscle cells) with either propofol 25 μM or sevoflurane 2% in the hypoxia chamber (1% O<sub>2</sub>, 37°C) for 1 hour, followed by room temperature air for 2 hours. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were also measured via flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods, respectively. Ten pigs were used for the <em>in vivo</em> study. After anesthesia with either propofol (10–15 mg/kg/h) or sevoflurane (2%), internal carotid and femoral arterial catheters were inserted for direct blood pressure monitoring and blood sampling. The IR models were produced via descending thoracic aorta clamping for 1 hour and declamping for 2 hours during the procedure for left ventricular assist device implantation. Blood serum was sampled from upper and lower body vessels for ROS and TNF-α evaluation via thiobarbituric acid reacting substances method and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed significant reduction of both ROS and TNF-α levels in the propofol group <em>in vitro</em> IR model. However, there was no difference in lipid peroxidation and TNF-α level between propofol and sevoflurane for the <em>in vivo</em> IR model.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We concluded that propofol, compared with sevoflurane, can significantly inhibit ROS formation on a cell level. In addition, propofol can significantly inhibit TNF-α formation of monocytes and coronary smooth muscle cells but not aortic smooth muscle cells.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87042,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","volume":"54 1","pages":"Pages 6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aat.2015.11.002","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875459715000910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Objectives

Ischemia–reperfusion (IR) features massive oxidative stress of tissues and cytokine response. Propofol and sevoflurane, both of which are commonly used anesthetics, are thought to have different antioxidant activities. The aim of this study is to delineate the influence of these two drugs on the production of free radicals and proinflammatory cytokines in IR conditions via in vitro and in vivo models.

Methods

An in vitro IR model was performed by incubating porcine cells (including mononuclear cells, and coronary and aortic smooth muscle cells) with either propofol 25 μM or sevoflurane 2% in the hypoxia chamber (1% O2, 37°C) for 1 hour, followed by room temperature air for 2 hours. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were also measured via flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods, respectively. Ten pigs were used for the in vivo study. After anesthesia with either propofol (10–15 mg/kg/h) or sevoflurane (2%), internal carotid and femoral arterial catheters were inserted for direct blood pressure monitoring and blood sampling. The IR models were produced via descending thoracic aorta clamping for 1 hour and declamping for 2 hours during the procedure for left ventricular assist device implantation. Blood serum was sampled from upper and lower body vessels for ROS and TNF-α evaluation via thiobarbituric acid reacting substances method and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively.

Results

The results showed significant reduction of both ROS and TNF-α levels in the propofol group in vitro IR model. However, there was no difference in lipid peroxidation and TNF-α level between propofol and sevoflurane for the in vivo IR model.

Conclusion

We concluded that propofol, compared with sevoflurane, can significantly inhibit ROS formation on a cell level. In addition, propofol can significantly inhibit TNF-α formation of monocytes and coronary smooth muscle cells but not aortic smooth muscle cells.

异丙酚和七氟醚对猪缺血再灌注模型抗氧化剂和促炎细胞因子的影响
目的缺血再灌注(IR)具有组织大量氧化应激和细胞因子反应的特点。异丙酚和七氟醚都是常用的麻醉剂,它们被认为具有不同的抗氧化活性。本研究的目的是通过体外和体内模型来描述这两种药物对IR条件下自由基和促炎细胞因子产生的影响。方法用25 μM异丙酚或2%七氟醚在缺氧室(1% O2, 37℃)中孵育猪细胞(包括单个核细胞、冠状动脉和主动脉平滑肌细胞)1 h,室温空气孵育2 h,建立体外IR模型。并分别采用流式细胞术和酶联免疫吸附法检测活性氧(ROS)和肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)。用10头猪进行体内研究。用异丙酚(10 - 15mg /kg/h)或七氟醚(2%)麻醉后,插入颈内动脉和股动脉导管,直接监测血压并采血。在左心室辅助装置植入过程中,通过胸降主动脉夹持1小时和去夹持2小时制作IR模型。采用硫代巴比妥酸反应物质法和酶联免疫吸附法分别从上体和下体血管抽取血清,测定ROS和TNF-α水平。结果异丙酚组大鼠体外IR模型ROS和TNF-α水平均明显降低。然而,在体内IR模型中,异丙酚和七氟醚在脂质过氧化和TNF-α水平上没有差异。结论与七氟醚相比,异丙酚能显著抑制细胞水平上ROS的形成。此外,异丙酚能显著抑制单核细胞和冠状动脉平滑肌细胞TNF-α的形成,但对主动脉平滑肌细胞无抑制作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信