{"title":"Thrombolytic therapy in the setting of arterial line-induced ischemia.","authors":"J. Geschwind, M. Dagli, D. Lambert, H. Kobeiter","doi":"10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0590:TTITSO>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nTo evaluate the use of percutaneous transcatheter thrombolysis in the treatment of thrombosis due to radial artery cannulation.\n\n\nMETHODS AND RESULTS\nSeven patients (4 women; age range 41-62 years) with symptomatic cannulation-induced thrombosis and failure to improve after systemic anticoagulation underwent 8 catheter-directed thrombolytic infusions at our institution over a 3-year period. Access was either antegrade through the brachial artery or retrograde through the femoral artery. Thrombolytic infusions with urokinase began 2 to 12 days (average 6) after removal of the radial artery catheter. The thrombolytic infusion was successful in 5 of 7 patients based on angiographic flow restoration with <20% residual thrombus and significant clinical improvement in the ischemia.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWhen systemic anticoagulation has failed, percutaneous catheter-directed thrombolytic infusion appears to be effective in the treatment of most patients with severe ischemic hand symptoms due to thrombosis after radial artery cannulation.","PeriodicalId":60152,"journal":{"name":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","volume":"116 1","pages":"590-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0590:TTITSO>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
PURPOSE
To evaluate the use of percutaneous transcatheter thrombolysis in the treatment of thrombosis due to radial artery cannulation.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Seven patients (4 women; age range 41-62 years) with symptomatic cannulation-induced thrombosis and failure to improve after systemic anticoagulation underwent 8 catheter-directed thrombolytic infusions at our institution over a 3-year period. Access was either antegrade through the brachial artery or retrograde through the femoral artery. Thrombolytic infusions with urokinase began 2 to 12 days (average 6) after removal of the radial artery catheter. The thrombolytic infusion was successful in 5 of 7 patients based on angiographic flow restoration with <20% residual thrombus and significant clinical improvement in the ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS
When systemic anticoagulation has failed, percutaneous catheter-directed thrombolytic infusion appears to be effective in the treatment of most patients with severe ischemic hand symptoms due to thrombosis after radial artery cannulation.