Does preoperative wound infection impact outcomes of lower extremity salvage via microvascular free flap reconstruction? A cohort study

Louis-Xavier Barrette , Cody C. Fowler , Stacy R. Henderson , Geoffrey M. Kozak , John T. Stranix , Robyn B. Broach , John P. Fischer , L. Scott Levin , Stephen J. Kovach
{"title":"Does preoperative wound infection impact outcomes of lower extremity salvage via microvascular free flap reconstruction? A cohort study","authors":"Louis-Xavier Barrette ,&nbsp;Cody C. Fowler ,&nbsp;Stacy R. Henderson ,&nbsp;Geoffrey M. Kozak ,&nbsp;John T. Stranix ,&nbsp;Robyn B. Broach ,&nbsp;John P. Fischer ,&nbsp;L. Scott Levin ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Kovach","doi":"10.1016/j.orthop.2021.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We sought to identify preoperative wound characteristics associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing lower extremity (LE) reconstruction with microvascular free flaps.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the LE at a single academic institution between 2010-2021 was conducted. Preoperative wound culture results were classified by Gram stain, aerobe status, multi-drug resistance (MDR), and presence of multiple bacteria. Outcomes studied included flap viability at 60, 120, and 180 days, as well as flap dehiscence, partial and full necrosis, sepsis, and amputation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 218 LE free flap reconstructions were performed during the study period. 152 (69.7%) of patients were male. Rate of secondary amputation following attempted limb salvage was 4.6%. LE reconstructions utilized either fasciocutaneous (79.4%) or muscular flaps (20.6%). The type of free flap used for reconstruction had no effect on reconstructive outcomes or flap viability. Preoperative bacterial wound cultures were obtained in 102 (46.8%) patients; 80 cultures (78.4%) were positive for bacterial growth. Of these, 33 (41.2%) grew Gram-positive bacteria, 14 (17.5%) grew Gram-negative bacteria, and 33 (41.2%) grew multiple organisms. Positive preoperative wound culture was independently associated with flap failure at 120 days (<em>p =</em> 0.04) when compared to wounds with no infection. Among patients with positive cultures, polymicrobial infection was significantly associated with higher rates of amputation (<em>p</em> = 0.04) compared to single Gram-positive or Gram-negative infectious agents.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Identification and management of positive wound cultures may play an important role in outcomes of microvascular free flap reconstruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100994,"journal":{"name":"Orthoplastic Surgery","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 11-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X21000324/pdfft?md5=d0381713e2fb46384523c1c45e898ea8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666769X21000324-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthoplastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X21000324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose

We sought to identify preoperative wound characteristics associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing lower extremity (LE) reconstruction with microvascular free flaps.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the LE at a single academic institution between 2010-2021 was conducted. Preoperative wound culture results were classified by Gram stain, aerobe status, multi-drug resistance (MDR), and presence of multiple bacteria. Outcomes studied included flap viability at 60, 120, and 180 days, as well as flap dehiscence, partial and full necrosis, sepsis, and amputation.

Results

A total of 218 LE free flap reconstructions were performed during the study period. 152 (69.7%) of patients were male. Rate of secondary amputation following attempted limb salvage was 4.6%. LE reconstructions utilized either fasciocutaneous (79.4%) or muscular flaps (20.6%). The type of free flap used for reconstruction had no effect on reconstructive outcomes or flap viability. Preoperative bacterial wound cultures were obtained in 102 (46.8%) patients; 80 cultures (78.4%) were positive for bacterial growth. Of these, 33 (41.2%) grew Gram-positive bacteria, 14 (17.5%) grew Gram-negative bacteria, and 33 (41.2%) grew multiple organisms. Positive preoperative wound culture was independently associated with flap failure at 120 days (p = 0.04) when compared to wounds with no infection. Among patients with positive cultures, polymicrobial infection was significantly associated with higher rates of amputation (p = 0.04) compared to single Gram-positive or Gram-negative infectious agents.

Conclusion

Identification and management of positive wound cultures may play an important role in outcomes of microvascular free flap reconstruction.

术前伤口感染会影响微血管游离皮瓣重建下肢修复的结果吗?队列研究
目的:研究微血管游离皮瓣下肢重建患者术前伤口特征与不良预后风险的相关性。材料与方法回顾性分析2010-2021年间在同一学术机构接受游离皮瓣重建LE的患者。术前伤口培养结果根据革兰氏染色、需氧菌状态、多药耐药(MDR)和多种细菌的存在情况进行分类。研究结果包括皮瓣在60、120和180天的生存能力,以及皮瓣开裂、部分和完全坏死、败血症和截肢。结果研究期间共行游离皮瓣重建218例。男性152例(69.7%)。残肢未遂后继发截肢率为4.6%。LE重建采用筋膜皮瓣(79.4%)或肌肉皮瓣(20.6%)。用于重建的游离皮瓣的类型对重建的结果或皮瓣的生存能力没有影响。术前创面细菌培养102例(46.8%);80例(78.4%)培养物细菌生长阳性。其中培养革兰氏阳性菌33例(41.2%),培养革兰氏阴性菌14例(17.5%),培养多菌33例(41.2%)。与未感染的伤口相比,术前伤口培养阳性与120天皮瓣失效独立相关(p = 0.04)。在培养阳性的患者中,与单一革兰氏阳性或革兰氏阴性感染因子相比,多微生物感染与更高的截肢率显著相关(p = 0.04)。结论伤口阳性培养物的鉴定和处理对微血管游离皮瓣重建的效果起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信