Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries among laboring women: 2 prediction models and 1 risk calculator

Yi-ping Hu, Hong Lu, J Zhang, Lihua Ren, Minghui Yang
{"title":"Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries among laboring women: 2 prediction models and 1 risk calculator","authors":"Yi-ping Hu, Hong Lu, J Zhang, Lihua Ren, Minghui Yang","doi":"10.1097/NR9.0000000000000012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Although several prediction models have been developed to estimate the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) among laboring women, none have been used in clinical practice because of controversial or unavailable predictors included in the prediction models and the format used to present them. Thus, it is essential to develop evidence-based prediction models for OASIS using known antenatal and modifiable intrapartum factors and to present them in user-friendly formats. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop evidence-based prediction models for OASIS and a risk calculator to present prediction models. Methods: Models were developed based on a systematic review and meta-analysis in which risk factors for OASIS were identified, and the pooled odds ratio for each risk factor was calculated. A logistic regression model was used to develop the prediction models, and MATLAB with a graphical user interface was used to develop the risk calculator. Results: Two prediction models for OASIS were established: Model I and Model II. Model I included 7 known antenatal variables: maternal age, parity, prior cesarean delivery, prepregnancy body mass index, gestational age, estimated birth weight, and fetal position. Model II added 5 modifiable intrapartum variables to Model I: epidural analgesia, labor induction, labor augmentation, episiotomy, and operative vaginal birth. The risk calculator developed by writing the parameters in the logistic regression models into MATLAB scripts included 2 interfaces, each consisting of risk factors for OASIS and the possibility of OASIS occurring. Conclusions: This study developed 2 prediction models and a risk calculator for OASIS based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. Although the models were more scientific in model development methods and predictors included in the prediction models, they should be externally validated and updated to ensure better performance before they can be widely applied to guide clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":73407,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","volume":"24 1","pages":"13 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NR9.0000000000000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Although several prediction models have been developed to estimate the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) among laboring women, none have been used in clinical practice because of controversial or unavailable predictors included in the prediction models and the format used to present them. Thus, it is essential to develop evidence-based prediction models for OASIS using known antenatal and modifiable intrapartum factors and to present them in user-friendly formats. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop evidence-based prediction models for OASIS and a risk calculator to present prediction models. Methods: Models were developed based on a systematic review and meta-analysis in which risk factors for OASIS were identified, and the pooled odds ratio for each risk factor was calculated. A logistic regression model was used to develop the prediction models, and MATLAB with a graphical user interface was used to develop the risk calculator. Results: Two prediction models for OASIS were established: Model I and Model II. Model I included 7 known antenatal variables: maternal age, parity, prior cesarean delivery, prepregnancy body mass index, gestational age, estimated birth weight, and fetal position. Model II added 5 modifiable intrapartum variables to Model I: epidural analgesia, labor induction, labor augmentation, episiotomy, and operative vaginal birth. The risk calculator developed by writing the parameters in the logistic regression models into MATLAB scripts included 2 interfaces, each consisting of risk factors for OASIS and the possibility of OASIS occurring. Conclusions: This study developed 2 prediction models and a risk calculator for OASIS based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. Although the models were more scientific in model development methods and predictors included in the prediction models, they should be externally validated and updated to ensure better performance before they can be widely applied to guide clinical practice.
预测分娩妇女产科肛门括约肌损伤:2个预测模型和1个风险计算器
背景:虽然已经建立了几个预测模型来估计分娩妇女产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)的风险,但由于预测模型中包括的预测因子存在争议或无法获得,以及预测模型的格式,没有一个模型被用于临床实践。因此,有必要利用已知的产前因素和可修改的产时因素开发基于证据的OASIS预测模型,并以用户友好的格式呈现。目的:本研究的目的是建立基于证据的绿洲预测模型和风险计算器来呈现预测模型。方法:基于系统综述和荟萃分析建立模型,确定OASIS的危险因素,并计算每个危险因素的合并优势比。采用逻辑回归模型建立预测模型,采用MATLAB图形用户界面开发风险计算器。结果:建立了两种预测模型:模型I和模型II。模型1包括7个已知的产前变量:产妇年龄、胎次、既往剖宫产、孕前体重指数、胎龄、估计出生体重和胎儿体位。模型II在模型I的基础上增加了5个可修改的产时变量:硬膜外镇痛、引产、助产、会阴切开术、顺产术。将logistic回归模型中的参数写入MATLAB脚本开发的风险计算器包括2个接口,每个接口由OASIS的危险因素和发生OASIS的可能性组成。结论:本研究在系统回顾和meta分析的基础上建立了2个预测模型和风险计算器。虽然该模型在模型开发方法和预测模型中所包含的预测因子方面更加科学,但在广泛应用于指导临床实践之前,还需要进行外部验证和更新,以确保更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信