Roman Polanski (and Others) on Trial

IF 0.3 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
E. Mazierska
{"title":"Roman Polanski (and Others) on Trial","authors":"E. Mazierska","doi":"10.1080/2040350X.2022.2088135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article engages with arguments in recent discussions about Polanski’s personal conduct, and the effect of these discussions on the reception of his films. It also uses these debates to shed light on the changing attitudes toward cinema and art at large, pointing to the growing importance of the artists’ personal conduct, especially sexual conduct, in the assessment of their work, including making spotless behaviour a condition to reach the audience. It does so from a position which is critical of censorship. The article draws on Polanski’s biography, especially the part describing his encounter with Samantha Gailer (now Samantha Geimer) and recent journalistic discourse about his conduct and films, following the rise of the #MeToo movement. It is informed by debates about authorship in film and art and the relationship between moral and aesthetic values.","PeriodicalId":52267,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Eastern European Cinema","volume":"284 1","pages":"211 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Eastern European Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2040350X.2022.2088135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract This article engages with arguments in recent discussions about Polanski’s personal conduct, and the effect of these discussions on the reception of his films. It also uses these debates to shed light on the changing attitudes toward cinema and art at large, pointing to the growing importance of the artists’ personal conduct, especially sexual conduct, in the assessment of their work, including making spotless behaviour a condition to reach the audience. It does so from a position which is critical of censorship. The article draws on Polanski’s biography, especially the part describing his encounter with Samantha Gailer (now Samantha Geimer) and recent journalistic discourse about his conduct and films, following the rise of the #MeToo movement. It is informed by debates about authorship in film and art and the relationship between moral and aesthetic values.
罗曼·波兰斯基(和其他人)受审
本文探讨了最近关于波兰斯基个人行为的讨论,以及这些讨论对其电影接受度的影响。它还利用这些辩论来揭示人们对电影和艺术的态度的变化,指出艺术家的个人行为,尤其是性行为,在评估他们的工作时越来越重要,包括将一尘不染的行为作为接触观众的条件。它是站在批判审查制度的立场上这么做的。这篇文章引用了波兰斯基的传记,尤其是描述他与萨曼莎·盖勒(现在的萨曼莎·盖默)的相遇,以及随着#MeToo运动的兴起,最近关于他的行为和电影的新闻讨论。它是由关于电影和艺术的作者身份以及道德和审美价值之间的关系的辩论所告知的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Eastern European Cinema
Studies in Eastern European Cinema Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信