Midwives’ knowledge of COVID 19 and pregnancy in four maternity units in Brazzaville in 2021

J. Mbongo, Gickelle Bintsene Mpika, H. N'dinga, Norcia Itoua, Jean Daniel Mahoungou, Serge Parfait Koko, L. Iloki
{"title":"Midwives’ knowledge of COVID 19 and pregnancy in four maternity units in Brazzaville in 2021","authors":"J. Mbongo, Gickelle Bintsene Mpika, H. N'dinga, Norcia Itoua, Jean Daniel Mahoungou, Serge Parfait Koko, L. Iloki","doi":"10.15406/ijfcm.2021.05.00243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate midwives' knowledge of Covid 19 and Pregnancy. Materials and methods: This was a knowledge analytical study. Midwives working in delivery units and outpatient clinics were included. The variables were focused on socio-demographic and professional aspects, general information on Covid-19, the clinical and biological manifestations, the prevention of corona virus transmission and the prevention of mother-to-child transmission. Results: Out of 82 respondents, 73 (89.1%) were secondary school graduates, working mainly in Talangai Hospital. The media was the source of information for 78 (95.1%); Covid 19 is a viral infection 78 (95.1%); the route of contamination was respiratory 79 (96.3%) and transplacental 16 (19.5%) of respondents. The clinical signs were: fever 76 (92.7%), cough 77 (93.9%) and dyspnea 77 (93.9%) of the respondents. Biological diagnosis was done by RDT (rapid diagnosis test) 73 (89, 1%), completed by PCR confirmation 43 (52.4%) of the respondents. Prevention methods: hand washing several times a day 72 (87,8%) and alternative by disinfectant gel 75 (91,5%); lifting the fold of the elbow when sneezing or coughing 76 (89%); used handkerchief thrown in the trash 70 (85,4%) of the respondents; out of 3 preventive measures in the labour room, 20 (23,4%) answered correctly, 48 (58,5%) gave only 1 to 2 correct answers and 14 (17%) did not identify any measure. The overall knowledge of midwives on Covid 19 was insufficient 25 (30.5%), average 52 (63.4%), good 5 (6.1%) of the respondents. For the factors that can influence the level of knowledge, there is no link between the level of knowledge and the socio-professional characteristics of the midwives (Chi2 test: P-value ˃ 5%). However, the fact of working at the CHUB could have a slight influence (sensitive P-value close to 95%). Conclusion: There is a need to diversify sources of information for an improvement of knowledge in order to place the midwife at the top of the medical news.","PeriodicalId":13982,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Family & Community Medicine","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Family & Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/ijfcm.2021.05.00243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate midwives' knowledge of Covid 19 and Pregnancy. Materials and methods: This was a knowledge analytical study. Midwives working in delivery units and outpatient clinics were included. The variables were focused on socio-demographic and professional aspects, general information on Covid-19, the clinical and biological manifestations, the prevention of corona virus transmission and the prevention of mother-to-child transmission. Results: Out of 82 respondents, 73 (89.1%) were secondary school graduates, working mainly in Talangai Hospital. The media was the source of information for 78 (95.1%); Covid 19 is a viral infection 78 (95.1%); the route of contamination was respiratory 79 (96.3%) and transplacental 16 (19.5%) of respondents. The clinical signs were: fever 76 (92.7%), cough 77 (93.9%) and dyspnea 77 (93.9%) of the respondents. Biological diagnosis was done by RDT (rapid diagnosis test) 73 (89, 1%), completed by PCR confirmation 43 (52.4%) of the respondents. Prevention methods: hand washing several times a day 72 (87,8%) and alternative by disinfectant gel 75 (91,5%); lifting the fold of the elbow when sneezing or coughing 76 (89%); used handkerchief thrown in the trash 70 (85,4%) of the respondents; out of 3 preventive measures in the labour room, 20 (23,4%) answered correctly, 48 (58,5%) gave only 1 to 2 correct answers and 14 (17%) did not identify any measure. The overall knowledge of midwives on Covid 19 was insufficient 25 (30.5%), average 52 (63.4%), good 5 (6.1%) of the respondents. For the factors that can influence the level of knowledge, there is no link between the level of knowledge and the socio-professional characteristics of the midwives (Chi2 test: P-value ˃ 5%). However, the fact of working at the CHUB could have a slight influence (sensitive P-value close to 95%). Conclusion: There is a need to diversify sources of information for an improvement of knowledge in order to place the midwife at the top of the medical news.
2021年布拉柴维尔四个产科单位助产士对COVID - 19和妊娠的了解情况
目的:了解助产士对新冠肺炎和妊娠相关知识的了解情况。材料与方法:本研究为知识分析性研究。在分娩单位和门诊诊所工作的助产士也包括在内。这些变量主要集中在社会人口统计学和专业方面、Covid-19的一般信息、临床和生物学表现、冠状病毒传播的预防和母婴传播的预防。结果:82名调查对象中,73人(89.1%)为中学毕业生,主要在塔兰盖医院工作。媒体是78个(95.1%)的信息来源;Covid - 19是病毒性感染78 (95.1%);污染途径为呼吸道79例(96.3%),经胎盘16例(19.5%)。临床表现为:发热76例(92.7%),咳嗽77例(93.9%),呼吸困难77例(93.9%)。生物诊断采用快速诊断试验(RDT) 73例(89.1%),PCR确诊43例(52.4%)。预防方法:每天洗手数次72次(87,8%)和替代消毒凝胶75次(91.5%);打喷嚏或咳嗽时提起肘部76例(89%);被扔进垃圾桶的用过的手帕70个(85.4%);在产房的3项预防措施中,20名(23.4%)回答正确,48名(58.5%)只回答1 - 2项,14名(17%)没有指出任何措施。受访助产士对新冠肺炎的总体认识不足的占25(30.5%),平均的占52(63.4%),良好的占5(6.1%)。对于影响助产士知识水平的因素,助产士的知识水平与社会专业特征之间没有联系(ch2检验:p值5%)。然而,在CHUB工作的事实可能有轻微的影响(敏感p值接近95%)。结论:有必要多样化的信息来源,以提高知识,使助产士在医学新闻的顶部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书